Good–deal bounds are price bounds for a financial portfolio which depends on an individual trader's preferences. Mathematically, if A {\displaystyle A} is a set of portfolios with future outcomes which are "acceptable" to the trader, then define the function ρ : L p → R {\displaystyle \rho :{\mathcal {L}}^{p}\to \mathbb {R} } by
ρ ( X ) = inf { t ∈ R : ∃ V T ∈ A T : X + t + V T ∈ A } = inf { t ∈ R : X + t ∈ A − A T } {\displaystyle \rho (X)=\inf \left\{t\in \mathbb {R} :\exists V_{T}\in A_{T}:X+t+V_{T}\in A\right\}=\inf \left\{t\in \mathbb {R} :X+t\in A-A_{T}\right\}}
where A T {\displaystyle A_{T}} is the set of final values for self-financing trading strategies. Then any price in the range ( − ρ ( X ) , ρ ( − X ) ) {\displaystyle (-\rho (X),\rho (-X))} does not provide a good deal for this trader, and this range is called the "no good-deal price bounds." If A = { Z ∈ L 0 : Z ≥ 0 P − a . s . } {\displaystyle A=\left\{Z\in {\mathcal {L}}^{0}:Z\geq 0\;\mathbb {P} -a.s.\right\}} then the good-deal price bounds are the no-arbitrage price bounds, and correspond to the subhedging and superhedging prices. The no-arbitrage bounds are the greatest extremes that good-deal bounds can take. If A = { Z ∈ L 0 : E [ u ( Z ) ] ≥ E [ u ( 0 ) ] } {\displaystyle A=\left\{Z\in {\mathcal {L}}^{0}:\mathbb {E} [u(Z)]\geq \mathbb {E} [u(0)]\right\}} where u {\displaystyle u} is a utility function, then the good-deal price bounds correspond to the indifference price bounds.
References
