ArticleslgStudy

chemistry

Green–Davies–Mingos rules

Green–Davies–Mingos rules is a chemistry topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Green–Davies–Mingos rules rather than just read about it. In short: In organometallic chemistry, the Green–Davies–Mingos rules predict the regiochemistry for nucleophilic addition to 18-electron metal complexes containing multiple unsaturated ligands. The rules were published in 1978 by organometallic chemists Stephen G.

Green–Davies–Mingos rules — main illustration
Green–Davies–Mingos rules — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Green–Davies–Mingos rules belongs to chemistry; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Green–Davies–Mingos rules to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Green–Davies–Mingos rules from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

In organometallic chemistry, the Green–Davies–Mingos rules predict the regiochemistry for nucleophilic addition to 18-electron metal complexes containing multiple unsaturated ligands. The rules were published in 1978 by organometallic chemists Stephen G. Davies, Malcolm Green, and Michael Mingos. They describe how and where unsaturated hydrocarbon generally become more susceptibile to nucleophilic attack upon complexation.

Rule 1 Nucleophilic attack is preferred on even-numbered polyenes (even hapticity).

Rule 2 Nucleophiles preferentially add to acyclic polyenes rather than cyclic polyenes.

Rule 3 Nucleophiles preferentially add to even-hapticity polyene ligands at a terminus. Nucleophiles add to odd-hapticity acyclic polyene ligands at a terminal position if the metal is highly electrophilic, otherwise they add at an internal site. Simplified: even before odd and open before closed The following is a diagram showing the reactivity trends of even/odd hapticity and open/closed π-ligands.

The metal center is electron withdrawing. This effect is enhanced if the metal is also attached to a carbonyl. Electron poor metals do not back bond well to the carbonyl. The more electron withdrawing the metal is, the more triple bond character the CO ligand has. This gives the ligand a higher force constant. The resultant force constant found for a ligated carbonyl represents the same force constant for π ligands if they replaced the CO ligand in the same complex. Nucleophilic addition does not occur if kCO* (the effective force constant for the CO ligand) is below a threshold value The following figure shows a ligated metal attached to a carbonyl group. This group has a partial positive charge and therefore is susceptible to nucleophilic attack. If the ligand represented by Ln were a π-ligand, it would be activated toward nucleophilic attack as well.

L n −

M δ + − C ≡ O δ + {\displaystyle {\ce {L_{\mathit {n}}-{}}}{\overset {\color {Red}\delta +}{\ce {M}}}{\ce {-C#}}{\overset {\color {Red}\delta +}{\ce {O}}}}

Incoming nucleophilic attack happens at one of the termini of the π-system in the figure below:

In this example the ring system can be thought of as analogous to 1,3-butadiene. Following the Green–Davies–Mingos rules, since butadiene is an open π-ligand of even hapticity, nucleophilic attack will occur at one of the terminal positions of the π-system. This occurs because the LUMO of butadiene has larger lobes on the ends rather than the internal positions.

Effects of types of ligands on regiochemistry of attack Nucleophilic attack at terminal position of allyl ligands when π accepting ligand is present.

If sigma donating ligands are present they pump electrons into the ligand and attack occurs at the internal position.

Effects of asymmetrical ligands When asymmetrical allyl ligands are present attack occurs at the more substituted position.

In this case the attack will occur on the carbon with both R groups attached to it since that is the more substituted position.

Uses in synthesis Nucleophilic addition to π ligands can be used in synthesis. One example of this is to make cyclic metal compounds. Nucleophiles add to the center of the π ligand and produces a metallobutane.

Internal attack Periana Roy A.; Bergman Robert G. (1984). "Rapid intramolecular rearrangement of a hydrido(cyclopropyl)rhodium complex to a rhodacyclobutane. Independent synthesis of the metallacycle by addition of hydride to the central carbon atom of a cationic rhodium π-allyl complex". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 106 (23): 7272–7273. Bibcode:1984JAChS.106.7272P. doi:10.1021/ja00335a084. Suzuki, Tomohiro; Okada, Goro; Hioki, Yasunori; Fujimoto, Hiroshi (2003). "Theoretical Study of the Reactivity of (π-Allyl)molybdenum Complexes". Organometallics. 22 (18): 3649–3658. doi:10.1021/om0207459. Schörshusen, Sonja; Heck, Jürgen (2007). "Metal-Mediated Transformations of Cyclooctatetraene to Novel Methylene-Bridged, Bicyclic Compounds". Organometallics. 26 (22): 5386–5394. doi:10.1021/om700539e.

References

Illustrations

Green–Davies–Mingos rules illustration
Green–Davies–Mingos rules illustration
Green–Davies–Mingos rules illustration
Green–Davies–Mingos rules illustration
Green–Davies–Mingos rules illustration

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Green–Davies–Mingos rules

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Green–Davies–Mingos rules claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In chemistry, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Green–Davies–Mingos rules before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Green–Davies–Mingos rules ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Green–Davies–Mingos rules

In research
Green–Davies–Mingos rules appears in chemistry research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Green–Davies–Mingos rules in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Green–Davies–Mingos rules is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Reaction mechanisms, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Green–Davies–Mingos rules outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Green–Davies–Mingos rules” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Green–Davies–Mingos rules in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Green–Davies–Mingos rules means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Green–Davies–Mingos rules out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Green–Davies–Mingos rules in simple terms?

In organometallic chemistry, the Green–Davies–Mingos rules predict the regiochemistry for nucleophilic addition to 18-electron metal complexes containing multiple unsaturated ligands. The rules were published in 1978 by organometallic chemists Stephen G.

Why does Green–Davies–Mingos rules matter?

Because it connects several chemistry ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Green–Davies–Mingos rules?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Green–Davies–Mingos rules.

Tags

  • Reaction mechanisms

Keep exploring