ArticleslgStudy

physics

Hardy's paradox

Hardy's paradox is a physics topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Hardy's paradox rather than just read about it. In short: Hardy's paradox is a thought experiment in quantum mechanics devised by Lucien Hardy in 1992–1993 in which a particle and its antiparticle may interact without annihilating each other. Experiments using the technique of weak measurement have studied an interaction of polarized photons, and these have demonstrated that the phenomenon does occur.

Hardy's paradox — main illustration
Hardy's paradox — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Hardy's paradox belongs to physics; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Hardy's paradox to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Hardy's paradox from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Hardy's paradox is a thought experiment in quantum mechanics devised by Lucien Hardy in 1992–1993 in which a particle and its antiparticle may interact without annihilating each other. Experiments using the technique of weak measurement have studied an interaction of polarized photons, and these have demonstrated that the phenomenon does occur. However, the consequence of these experiments is only that past events can be inferred after their occurrence as a probabilistic wave collapse. These weak measurements are considered to be an observation themselves, and therefore part of the causation of wave collapse, making the objective results only a probabilistic function rather than a fixed reality. This confirms that a hidden-variable quantum theory, to be consistent with the experiments, must be non-local (in the sense of Bell) and contextual.

Setup description and the results

The basic building block of Hardy's thought experiment are two Mach–Zehnder interferometers for quantum particles and antiparticles. We will describe the case using electrons and positrons. Each interferometer consists of bent paths and two beam splitters (labeled BS1 and BS2 in the accompanying diagram) and is tuned so that when operating individually, particles always exit to the same particle detector (the ones labeled c in the diagram; c is for "constructive interference" and d is for "destructive interference"). For example, for the right-hand side interferometer, when operating alone, entering electrons (labeled e−) become a quantum superposition of electrons taking the path v− and electrons taking path w− (in the diagram, the latter part of the w− path is labeled u−), but these constructively interfere and thus always exit in arm c−:

| e − ⟩ → | v − ⟩ + i | w − ⟩ 2 → i | c − ⟩ . {\displaystyle \left|e^{-}\right\rangle \to {\frac {\left|v^{-}\right\rangle +i\left|w^{-}\right\rangle }{\sqrt {2}}}\to i\left|c^{-}\right\rangle .}

Similarly, positrons (labeled e+) are always detected at c+. In the actual experiment the interferometers are arranged so that part of their paths overlap as shown in the diagram. If the amplitude for the particle in one arm, say w−, were to be obstructed by a second particle in w+ that collides with it, only the v amplitude would reach the second beam splitter and would split into arms c+ and d+ with equal amplitudes. The detection of a particle in d+ would thus indicate the presence of the obstructing particle, but without an annihilation taking place. For this reason, this scheme was named interaction-free measurement. If (classically speaking) both the electron and the positron take the w paths in their respective interferometers, they will annihilate to produce two gamma rays: | w + ⟩ | w − ⟩ → | γ ⟩ | γ ⟩ {\displaystyle \left|w^{+}\right\rangle \left|w^{-}\right\rangle \to \left|\gamma \right\rangle \left|\gamma \right\rangle } . There is a 1 in 4 chance of this happening. We can express the state of the system, before the final beam splitters, as

1 2 ( | v + ⟩ | v − ⟩ + i | v + ⟩ | w − ⟩ + i | w + ⟩ | v − ⟩ − | γ ⟩ | γ ⟩ ) . {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{2}}\left(\left|v^{+}\right\rangle \left|v^{-}\right\rangle +i\left|v^{+}\right\rangle \left|w^{-}\right\rangle +i\left|w^{+}\right\rangle \left|v^{-}\right\rangle -\left|\gamma \right\rangle \left|\gamma \right\rangle \right).}

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Hardy's paradox

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Hardy's paradox claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In physics, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Hardy's paradox before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Hardy's paradox ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Hardy's paradox

In research
Hardy's paradox appears in physics research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Hardy's paradox in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Hardy's paradox is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Paradoxes, Quantum measurement, Thought experiments in quantum mechanics, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Hardy's paradox outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Hardy's paradox” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Hardy's paradox in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Hardy's paradox means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Hardy's paradox out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Hardy's paradox in simple terms?

Hardy's paradox is a thought experiment in quantum mechanics devised by Lucien Hardy in 1992–1993 in which a particle and its antiparticle may interact without annihilating each other. Experiments using the technique of weak measurement have studied an interaction of polarized photons, and these ha…

Why does Hardy's paradox matter?

Because it connects several physics ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Hardy's paradox?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Hardy's paradox.

Tags

  • Paradoxes
  • Quantum measurement
  • Thought experiments in quantum mechanics

Keep exploring