ArticleslgStudy

biology

Heterogeneous earliest finish time

Heterogeneous earliest finish time is a biology topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Heterogeneous earliest finish time rather than just read about it. In short: Heterogeneous earliest finish time (HEFT) is a heuristic algorithm to schedule a set of dependent tasks onto a network of heterogenous workers taking communication time into account. For inputs HEFT takes a set of tasks, represented as a directed acyclic graph, a set of workers, the times to execute each task on each worker, and the times to communicate the results from each job to each of its children between each…

Key takeaways

  • Heterogeneous earliest finish time belongs to biology; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Heterogeneous earliest finish time to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Heterogeneous earliest finish time from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Heterogeneous earliest finish time (HEFT) is a heuristic algorithm to schedule a set of dependent tasks onto a network of heterogenous workers taking communication time into account. For inputs HEFT takes a set of tasks, represented as a directed acyclic graph, a set of workers, the times to execute each task on each worker, and the times to communicate the results from each job to each of its children between each pair of workers. It descends from list scheduling algorithms.

Algorithm HEFT executes in two phases.

Prioritizing tasks In the first phase each task is given a priority. The priority of each task n i {\displaystyle n_{i}} is usually designated to be its "upward rank" which is defined recursively as follows

r a n k u ( n i ) = w i ¯ + max n j ∈ s u c c ( n i ) ( c i , j ¯ + r a n k u ( n j ) ) {\displaystyle rank_{u}(n_{i})={\overline {w_{i}}}+\max _{n_{j}\in succ(n_{i})}({\overline {c_{i,j}}}+rank_{u}(n_{j}))}

where n i {\displaystyle n_{i}} represents the i t h {\displaystyle i^{th}} task, w i ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {w_{i}}}} is an average computation cost of job i among all the processor, s u c c ( n i ) {\displaystyle succ(n_{i})} is the set of all jobs that immediately depend on task n i {\displaystyle n_{i}} , and c i , j ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {c_{i,j}}}} is the average communication cost of the variables transferred between jobs n i {\displaystyle n_{i}} and n j {\displaystyle n_{j}} between all pairs of workers. Note that the computation of r a n k u ( n i ) {\displaystyle rank_{u}(n_{i})} depends on the computation of the rank of all its children. The upward rank is meant to represent the expected distance of any task from the end of the computation. For averaged quantities like w i ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {w_{i}}}} different averages may provide different results.

Assigning tasks to workers In the second phase tasks are assigned to workers. Now that all tasks are prioritized we consider and schedule each one, starting with the highest priority. The task with the highest priority for which all dependent tasks have finished is scheduled on the worker which will result in the earliest finish time of that task. This finish time depends on the communication time to send all necessary inputs to the worker, the computation time of the task on the worker, and the time when that processor becomes available (it may be busy with another task). HEFT uses an insertion-based policy that fills sufficiently sized gaps between already scheduled tasks.

Discussion HEFT is well respected among heuristic algorithms for this problem. But in complex situations it can easily fail to find the optimal scheduling. HEFT is essentially a greedy algorithm and incapable of making short-term sacrifices for long term benefits. Some improved algorithms based on HEFT look ahead to better estimate the quality of a scheduling decision can be used to trade run-time for scheduling performance.

Code HEFT implementations are available on GitHub in the programming languages C++, and Python.

References

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Heterogeneous earliest finish time

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Heterogeneous earliest finish time claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In biology, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Heterogeneous earliest finish time before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Heterogeneous earliest finish time ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Heterogeneous earliest finish time

In research
Heterogeneous earliest finish time appears in biology research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Heterogeneous earliest finish time in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Heterogeneous earliest finish time is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Scheduling algorithms, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Heterogeneous earliest finish time outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Heterogeneous earliest finish time” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Heterogeneous earliest finish time in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Heterogeneous earliest finish time means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Heterogeneous earliest finish time out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Heterogeneous earliest finish time in simple terms?

Heterogeneous earliest finish time (HEFT) is a heuristic algorithm to schedule a set of dependent tasks onto a network of heterogenous workers taking communication time into account. For inputs HEFT takes a set of tasks, represented as a directed acyclic graph, a set of workers, the times to execut…

Why does Heterogeneous earliest finish time matter?

Because it connects several biology ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Heterogeneous earliest finish time?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Heterogeneous earliest finish time.

Tags

  • Scheduling algorithms

Keep exploring