Historical climatology is the study of historical changes in climate and their effect on civilization from the emergence of homininis to the present day. It is concerned with the reconstruction of weather and climate and their effect on historical societies, including a culturally influenced history of science and perception. This is done in the broader context of environmental history. This differs from paleoclimatology which encompasses climate change over the entire history of Earth. These historical impacts of climate change can improve human life and cause societies to flourish, or can be instrumental in civilization's societal collapse. The study seeks to define periods in human history where temperature or precipitation varied from what is observed in the present day. The primary sources include written records such as sagas, chronicles, maps and local history literature as well as pictorial representations such as paintings, drawings and even rock art. The archaeological record is equally important in establishing evidence of settlement, water and land usage.
Methods In literate societies, historians may find written evidence of climatic variations over hundreds or thousands of years, such as phenological records of natural processes, for example viticultural records of grape harvest dates. In preliterate or non-literate societies, researchers must rely on other techniques to find evidence of historical climate differences. Past population levels and habitable ranges of humans or plants and animals may be used to find evidence of past differences in climate for the region. Palynology, the study of pollens, can show not only the range of plants and to reconstruct possible ecology, but to estimate the amount of precipitation in a given time period, based on the abundance of pollen in that layer of sediment or ice. The distribution of diatoms in sediments can also be used to examine changes in salinity and climate over geologic eras.
The Palgrave Handbook of Climate History provides a comprehensive overview of the methods and results of historical climatology in a global context. According to this, information in historical documents should not be taken at face value without verification. The most credible are reports by contemporaries that were recorded shortly after the event and dated documents from institutions. Transcripts of sources are prone to error. Furthermore, attention must be paid to correct dating. Globally, there have been two major systems of calendars: solar calendars based (approximately) on the revolution of the Earth around the sun, and lunar calendars based on the orbit of the moon. The former have historically been used in Europe (and its colonies), India, and Iran, while lunar calendars were historically used in the Islamic world and imperial China. It is also important to distinguish between Julian (“old style”) (Julian Calendar) and Gregorian (“new style”) dates (Gregorian Calendar). When "Saints'" days are used for dating, it must be determined whether the dates refer to the new or to the old calendar. Any corrections must be made accordingly. The presented almanac for the year 1600 displays the two dating styles including the Saints days side by side. The “old” Julian calendar to the right celebrates “Chris" [i.e. Christmas] 10 days later than the 'new” Gregorian calendar to the left, namely on 4 January. If Saints Days are used for dating attention must be paid to the calendar used, as the reproduction of the almanac illustrated shows Historical climatologists have created an interface between narrative and proxy data in the form of an ordinal index that allows converting disparate documentary evidence into continuous quantitative data that can be presented as time series A differentiated representation of thermal and wetness conditions was developed for Europe in terms of a temperature and precipitation index for nearly every month for which evidence of sufficient data density and quality is available. The so-called Pfister index comprises seven ordinal classes on a scale from -3 to +3. referring to deviations from a reference period in the 20th century that must be declared. Chroniclers included proxy data on plant development and the frequency of snow and ice to compare the meteorological conditions of a given year with those of other years. The interpretation draws on the complementarity between proxy data and the description of the associated weather pattern which needs to be consistent with the proxy.. Proxy information must be calibrated, meaning they must be statistically compared. against instrumental data. Chroniclers also describe effects of weather and climate on the human and the natural environment. This information is case-specific and relates to the historical context. If no relevant proxy data is available, narrative data should therefore be just assigned to index classes 1 ‘warm’ or -1 ‘cold’, regardless of the wording to prevent overestimation Until the early 2020s, documentary climate data was mainly limited to regional and local scales. In contrast to natural‑science proxy communities—such as the dendrochronologiclal community, which is embedded in globally coordinated research networks—documentary sources had rarely been integrated into large‑scale or global frameworks. Cultural and linguistic barriers long impeded the development of a global perspective. To unlock the potential of quantitative documentary evidence, researchers at the Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research led by Stefan Brönnimann, compiled a global inventory of climate‑relevant information contained in historical documents. As part of a meteorological Reanalysis, documentary data spanning the period from 1421 to 2008 was evaluated in conjunction with natural proxy records, particularly tree‑ring data A dedicated software enables the generation of flexible spatio-temporal reconstructions, including maps and time series
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
