ArticleslgStudy

earth science

Historicity of the Book of Mormon

Historicity of the Book of Mormon is a earth science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Historicity of the Book of Mormon rather than just read about it. In short: The historicity of the Book of Mormon, the claim that the book is ancient record of historic events, is an article of faith for most, but not all, members of the Latter Day Saint movement. Non-Mormon sources, in contrast, universally accept that the Book of Mormon is a 19th-century creation, and not an ancient record of pre-Columbian America.

Historicity of the Book of Mormon — main illustration
Historicity of the Book of Mormon — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Historicity of the Book of Mormon belongs to earth science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Historicity of the Book of Mormon to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Historicity of the Book of Mormon from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The historicity of the Book of Mormon, the claim that the book is ancient record of historic events, is an article of faith for most, but not all, members of the Latter Day Saint movement. Non-Mormon sources, in contrast, universally accept that the Book of Mormon is a 19th-century creation, and not an ancient record of pre-Columbian America. Its narrative conflicts with a broad spectrum of archaeological, historical, and scientific evidence regarding plants, animals, civilizations, and technology found in the New World before the Age of Discovery.

Book of Mormon origin In the early 19th-century United States, settlers encountered the remnants of ancient mounds, or earthenworks. Locals speculated about who had constructed the mounds, how they arrived in the Americas, and their relationship to contemporary indigenous populations. Joseph Smith, a young folk magic practitioner, reported a vision of treasures buried by ancient Mound Builders near his family home in New York. In subsequent years, Smith claimed he had obtained the treasure, including a set of golden plates containing historical records and artifacts allowing the plates to be miraculously translated. Smith published an English-language volume titled "The Book of Mormon" which purported to be a historic record of the ancient Americas. The Book of Mormon proposed to answer the questions of the day, explaining the transit of peoples to the Americas as a miraculous ocean voyage and narrating the destruction of mound builders at the hands of dark-skinned Americans. The Book of Mormon claims that shortly after God's miraculous confusion of tongues as punishment for the Tower of Babel, a group called the Jaredites undertook a miraculous transoceanic voyage to the Americas. The book further claims to describe the events in America after the fall of Jerusalem around 600 BCE, describing the righteous light-skinned Nephites who ultimately die at the hand of the Lamanites, a people cursed with dark skin by God for their wickedness. Archaeology has since concluded the mounds were constructed by a diverse set of ancient Native Americans, not a distinct culture or people. Founding a church and becoming its "Prophet, Seer, and Revelatory", Smith later began issuing statements he claimed were authored directly by God, without relying on claims of plates or artifacts.

Mainstream views Though purportedly a translation of ancient records, the Book of Mormon is regarded as a 19th-century work dictated, edited, and published by Joseph Smith. Archaeologist Michael D. Coe wrote:

I know there is not one professionally trained archaeologist, who is not a Mormon, who sees any scientific justification for believing the foregoing to be true [...] nothing, absolutely nothing, has ever shown up in any New World excavation which would suggest to a dispassionate observer that the Book of Mormon, as claimed by Joseph Smith, is a historical document relating to the history of early migrants to our hemisphere.

Historical errors in the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon contains extensive verbatim content taken from the 1769 edition of the King James Bible, even replicating translation errors found in that specific edition. The Book of Mormon mentions several animals, plants, and technologies that did not exist in the pre-Columbian Americas. These include asses, cattle, horses, oxen, sheep, swine, goats, elephants, wheat, barley, silk, steel, brass, breast plates, chains, iron working, plows, swords, scimitars, and chariots. While Smith and the Book of Mormon hold that Cumorah was a human-made mound, the hill is actually a naturally occurring glacial drumlin. Though the book claims Cumorah was the site of a battle with 200,000 deaths, there is no evidence that the hill was ever a settlement, fortification, or battle site. In Smith's era, there was a widespread belief that a "lost white race" had been responsible for building the large mounds throughout North America. The Book of Mormon adopts this viewpoint, claiming white pre-Columbian Americans like Moroni had been responsible for the mounds before being killed. Similarly, in Smith's era, some authors subscribed to the Jewish Indian theory, the idea that Native Americans had originally come from the Middle East. The Book of Mormon adopted this theory, claiming that Native Americans were descended from the Lamanites: migrants who journeyed from the Middle East to the Americas in 600 BCE and were later cursed with dark skin for their wickedness. In fact, the Americas had been inhabited for at least 15,000 years after migrants arrived from Asia, not the Middle East. Dark skin is modernly considered advantageous in a high-sun environment, not a divine curse. Beginning in 2007, the Book of Mormon's introduction was revised: it no longer claimed that the Lamanites were the "primary ancestors of the American Indians"; the revised text claims only that the Lamanites were "among the ancestors" of Native Americans.

Faith-based views The dominant and widely accepted view in the Latter Day Saint movement is that the Book of Mormon is a true and accurate account of these ancient American civilizations whose religious history it documents. Joseph Smith, whom most Latter Day Saints believe to have translated the work, stated, "I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book."

As historic The Gospel Topics essays section of the official website of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), the largest denomination in the movement, has two essays entitled "Book of Mormon and DNA Studies" and "Book of Mormon Translation". In them, the church affirms the literal historicity of the Book of Mormon. In the essay on DNA studies, the church argues for "a more careful approach to the data," and states that The conclusions of genetics, like those of any science, are tentative, and much work remains to be done to fully understand the origins of the native populations of the Americas. Nothing is known about the DNA of Book of Mormon peoples, and even if their genetic profile were known, there are sound scientific reasons that it might remain undetected. Meanwhile, in the essay on the Book of Mormon's translation, the church affirms that "the Book of Mormon came into the world through a series of miraculous events."

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Historicity of the Book of Mormon

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Historicity of the Book of Mormon claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In earth science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Historicity of the Book of Mormon before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Historicity of the Book of Mormon ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Historicity of the Book of Mormon

In research
Historicity of the Book of Mormon appears in earth science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Historicity of the Book of Mormon in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Historicity of the Book of Mormon is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Authorship debates, Book of Mormon studies, Criticism of Mormonism, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Historicity of the Book of Mormon outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Historicity of the Book of Mormon” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Historicity of the Book of Mormon in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Historicity of the Book of Mormon means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Historicity of the Book of Mormon out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Historicity of the Book of Mormon in simple terms?

The historicity of the Book of Mormon, the claim that the book is ancient record of historic events, is an article of faith for most, but not all, members of the Latter Day Saint movement. Non-Mormon sources, in contrast, universally accept that the Book of Mormon is a 19th-century creation, and no…

Why does Historicity of the Book of Mormon matter?

Because it connects several earth science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Historicity of the Book of Mormon?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Historicity of the Book of Mormon.

Tags

  • Authorship debates
  • Book of Mormon studies
  • Criticism of Mormonism
  • Historicity of religion
  • Pre-Columbian transoceanic contact theories
  • Pseudohistory
  • Textual criticism

Keep exploring