Holevo's theorem is a result in quantum information theory. It is sometimes called Holevo's bound, since it gives an upper bound on the accessible information, which is amount of information that can be known about a quantum state. It was first published by Alexander Holevo in 1973.
Statement
Setting Suppose Alice wants to send a classical message to Bob by encoding it into a quantum state, and suppose she can prepare a state from some fixed set { ρ 1 , . . . , ρ n } {\displaystyle \{\rho _{1},...,\rho _{n}\}} , with the i-th state prepared with probability p i {\displaystyle p_{i}} . Let X {\displaystyle X} be the classical register containing the choice of state made by Alice. Bob's objective is to recover the value of X {\displaystyle X} by measuring a POVM on the state he received. Let Y {\displaystyle Y} be the classical register containing Bob's measurement outcome, which is a random variable whose distribution depends on Bob's choice of measurement. Holevo's theorem bounds the amount of correlation between the classical registers X {\displaystyle X} and Y {\displaystyle Y} , independently of Bob's measurement choice, in terms of the Holevo information. The Holevo information does not depend on the measurement choice, and so this gives a bound which does not require optimizing over all possible measurements.
Precise statement Define the accessible information between X {\displaystyle X} and Y {\displaystyle Y} as the (classical) mutual information between the two registers maximized over all possible choices of Bob's measurements:
I a c c ( X : Y ) = sup { Π i B } i I ( X : Y | { Π i B } i ) , {\displaystyle I_{\rm {acc}}(X:Y)=\sup _{\{\Pi _{i}^{B}\}_{i}}I(X:Y|\{\Pi _{i}^{B}\}_{i}),}
where I ( X : Y | { Π i B } i ) {\displaystyle I(X:Y|\{\Pi _{i}^{B}\}_{i})} is the classical mutual information of the joint probability distribution given by p i j = p i Tr ( Π j B ρ i ) {\displaystyle p_{ij}=p_{i}\operatorname {Tr} (\Pi _{j}^{B}\rho _{i})} . There is no known formula for the accessible information in general. However, there is always an upper bound
I a c c ( X : Y ) ≤ χ ( η ) ≡ S ( ∑ i p i ρ i ) − ∑ i p i S ( ρ i ) , {\displaystyle I_{\rm {acc}}(X:Y)\leq \chi (\eta )\equiv S\left(\sum _{i}p_{i}\rho _{i}\right)-\sum _{i}p_{i}S(\rho _{i}),}
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
