ArticleslgStudy

physics

Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013

Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 is a physics topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 rather than just read about it. In short: The Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (H.R. 267) is a Law that was introduced into the United States House of Representatives of the 113th United States Congress on January 15, 2013. It passed the House on February 13, 2013 by a vote of 422-0, and then passed the Senate by unanimous consent on August 1, 2013.

Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 — main illustration
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 belongs to physics; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (H.R. 267) is a Law that was introduced into the United States House of Representatives of the 113th United States Congress on January 15, 2013. It passed the House on February 13, 2013 by a vote of 422-0, and then passed the Senate by unanimous consent on August 1, 2013. President Obama signed the Act into law on August 9, 2013. The Bill is intended to change some of the regulations in the United States surrounding hydropower by making it easier to develop smaller-output hydropower stations. According to the bill's proponents, current regulations are unwieldy and represent a significant hurdle to creating more hydropower plants. The Bill would alter those regulations to make it easier for smaller plants to get approval quickly. The legislation also requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to study how to further improve the regulatory process. The Bill would amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) and the Federal Power Act. Currently, hydropower projects that produce 5,000 kilowatts or less of power do not require certain licenses. The Bill would raise that amount to 10,000 kilowatts, facilitating the speed at which smaller hydropower projects could be built. The existing rules mean that it takes about five years for hydropower projects to get approval, according to hydropower industry sources. Hydropower is a significant source of renewable energy in the United States. The National Hydropower Association (NHA) conducted a study that concluded that "the United States could add approximately 60,000 MW of new hydropower capacity by 2025, potentially creating as many as 700,000 jobs in the process," according to the Committee Report released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee when it referred the Bill to the floor.

Background A similar bill, H.R. 5892, was introduced in the 112th United States Congress, where it passed the House by a vote of 372-0, but was never voted on in the Senate.

Procedural history

House The Bill was introduced into the House on January 15, 2013 by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA). It was sent to the United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the United States House Energy Subcommittee on Energy and Power. It passed the House by a vote of 422-0 on February 13, 2013.

Senate After passing in the House, the Bill was referred to the United States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on February 14, 2013. A ranking member of the Committee, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), told The Hill that she expected the Bill to pass in the Senate as well. Power Magazine also reported that chances for passage in the Senate looked good. The measure passed the Senate by unanimous consent on August 1, 2013.

Provisions/Elements of the bill This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, a public domain source. Section 1 of the Bill provides the short title of the bill, "Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013", and gives a table of contents for the bill. Section 2 of the Bill provides the "Findings" of Congress. It has a short description of facts that Congress lists as a way to provide context for why they are writing the bill and want to make this new law. In this bill, Congress lists the number of Americans who work in the hydropower industry (approximately 300, 000), the number of dams in the United States that are used to produce power (less than 3% of 80, 000), and that hydropower provides 7% of the energy generated in the United States. Section 3 of the Bill would amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to increase from 5,000 to 10,000 kilowatts the size of small hydroelectric power projects which the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may exempt from its license requirements. Section 4 of the Bill would amend the Federal Power Act to revise the limitation on the maximum installation capacity of qualifying conduit hydropower facilities that are eligible for an exemption from licensing requirements. It would also require any person, state, or municipality proposing to construct a qualifying conduit hydroelectricity facility to file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) a notice of intent to do so. It would require FERC, within 15 days after receiving such a notice of intent, to make an initial determination as to whether the facility meets the qualifying criteria. The Bill would then waive the license requirements for any Conduit hydroelectricity facility that:

(1) uses for electric power generation only the hydroelectric potential of a non-federally owned conduit, (2) has a maximum installed capacity of 5 megawatts, and (3) is not currently licensed or exempted from license requirements. The bill then redefines "conduit" to specify any tunnel, canal, pipeline, aqueduct, flume, ditch, or similar man-made water conveyance operated for the distribution of water for agricultural, municipal, or industrial consumption and not primarily for the generation of electricity. The new law would authorize the FERC to:

(1) exempt from license requirements any electric power generation facility that utilizes for such generation only the hydroelectric potential of a conduit, and has an installed capacity or 40 megawatts or fewer; and, in section 5, the FERC would be authorized to (2) extend the preliminary permit period for up to 2 additional years beyond the 3 years otherwise allowed if it finds that the permittee has implemented activities under the permit in good faith and with reasonable diligence. Section 6 of the Bill would direct the FERC to:

(1) investigate the feasibility of issuing a license for hydropower development at nonpowered dams and closed loop pumped storage projects during a two-year period, and (2) hold workshops and develop hydropower pilot projects. Finally, Section 7 would direct the Department of Energy to study:

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 illustration

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In physics, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013

In research
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 appears in physics research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Acts of the 113th United States Congress, Electric power in the United States, Energy infrastructure in the United States, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 in simple terms?

The Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (H.R. 267) is a Law that was introduced into the United States House of Representatives of the 113th United States Congress on January 15, 2013. It passed the House on February 13, 2013 by a vote of 422-0, and then passed the Senate by unanimous cons…

Why does Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 matter?

Because it connects several physics ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013.

Tags

  • Acts of the 113th United States Congress
  • Electric power in the United States
  • Energy infrastructure in the United States
  • Energy policy of the United States
  • Hydroelectricity in the United States
  • Renewable energy in the United States
  • Renewable energy policy in the United States
  • United States federal energy legislation
  • Water law in the United States

Keep exploring