ArticleslgStudy

chemistry

Inverted ligand field theory

Inverted ligand field theory is a chemistry topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Inverted ligand field theory rather than just read about it. In short: Inverted ligand field theory (ILFT) describes a phenomenon in the bonding of coordination complexes where the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital is primarily of ligand character. This is contrary to the traditional ligand field theory or crystal field theory picture and arises from the breaking down of the assumption that in organometallic complexes, ligands are more electronegative and have frontier orbitals below…

Inverted ligand field theory — main illustration
Inverted ligand field theory — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Inverted ligand field theory belongs to chemistry; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Inverted ligand field theory to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Inverted ligand field theory from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Inverted ligand field theory (ILFT) describes a phenomenon in the bonding of coordination complexes where the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital is primarily of ligand character. This is contrary to the traditional ligand field theory or crystal field theory picture and arises from the breaking down of the assumption that in organometallic complexes, ligands are more electronegative and have frontier orbitals below those of the d orbitals of electropositive metals. Towards the right of the d-block, when approaching the transition-metal–main group boundary, the d orbitals become more core-like, making their cations more electronegative. This decreases their energies and eventually arrives at a point where they are lower in energy than the ligand frontier orbitals. Here the ligand field inverts so that the bonding orbitals are more metal-based, and antibonding orbitals more ligand-based. The relative arrangement of the d orbitals are also inverted in complexes displaying this inverted ligand field.

History

The first example of an inverted ligand field was demonstrated in paper form 1995 by James Snyder. In this theoretical paper, Snyder proposed that the [Cu(CF3)4]− complexes reported by Naumann et al. and assigned a formal oxidation state of +3 at the copper would be better thought of as Cu(I). By comparing the d-orbital occupation, calculated charges and orbital population of [Cu(CF3)4]− "Cu(III)" complex and the formally Cu(I) [Cu(CH3)2]− complex, they illustrated how the former could be better described as a d10 copper complex experiencing two electron donation from the CF−3 ligands. The phenomenon, termed an inverted ligand field by Roald Hoffman, began to be described by Aullón and Alvarez as they identified this phenomenon as being a result of relative electronegativities. Lancaster and co-workers later provided experimental evidence to support the assignment of this oxidation state. Using UV/visible/near IR spectroscopy, Cu K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and 1s2p resonant inelastic X-ray scattering in concert with density functional theory, multiplet theory, and multireference calculations, they were able to map the ground state electronic configuration. This showed that the lowest unoccupied orbital was of primarily trifluoromethyl character. This confirmed the presence of an inverted ligand field and started building experimental tools to probe this phenomenon. Since the Snyder case, many other complexes of later transition metals have been shown to display inverted ligand field through both theoretical and experimental methods.

Probing inverted ligand fields Computational and experimental techniques have been imperative for the study of inverted ligand fields, especially when used in cooperatively.

Computational Computational methods have played a large role in understanding the nature of bonding in both molecular and solid-state systems displaying inverted ligand fields. The Hoffman group has completed many calculations to probe occurrence of inverted ligand fields in varying systems. In a study of the absorption of CO on PtBi and PtBi2 surfaces, on an octahedral [Pt(BiH3)6]4+ model with a Pt thought of having a formal +4 oxidation state, the team found that the t2g metal orbitals were higher energy that the eg orbitals. This inversion of the d orbital ordering was attributed to the bismuth based ligands being higher in energy than the metal d orbitals. In another study involving calculations on Ag(III) salt KAgF4, other Ag(II), and Ag(III) compounds, the Ag d orbitals were found to be below those of the fluoride ligand orbitals, and was confirmed by Grochala and cowrokers by core and valence spectroscopies. The Mealli group developed the program Computer Aided Composition of Atomic Orbitals (CACAO) to provide visualised molecular orbitals analyses based on perturbation theory principles. This program successfully displayed orbital energy inversion with organometallic complexes containing electronegative metals such as Ni or Cu bound to electropositive ligand atoms such as B, Si, or Sn. In these cases the bonding was described as a ligand to metal dative bond or sigma backdonation.

Alvarez and coworkers used computational methods to illustrate ligand field inversion in the band structures of solid state materials. The group found that, contrary to the classical bonding scheme, in calculated MoNiP8 band structures the eg-type orbitals of the octahedral nickel atom were found to be the major component of an occupied band below the t2g set. Additionally, the band around the fermi level which included the Ni+ antibonding orbitals were found to be mostly of phosphorus character, a clear example if an inverted ligand field. Similar observations were made in other solid state materials like the skutterudite CoP3 structure. A consequence of the inverted ligand field in this case is that the conductivity in skutterudites is associated with the phosphorus rings rather than the metal atoms.

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Inverted ligand field theory: Ligand field molecular orbital (MO) bonding regimes for Werner-type (left), covalent (middle), and inverted ligand fields.[1]
Ligand field molecular orbital (MO) bonding regimes for Werner-type (left), covalent (middle), and inverted ligand fields.[1]
Inverted ligand field theory: At the transition-metal - main group boundary, metal cations in organometallic complexes are more electronegative than the relatively more electropositive ligand atoms which act as z-type ligands.
At the transition-metal - main group boundary, metal cations in organometallic complexes are more electronegative than the relatively more electropositive ligand atoms which act as z-type ligands.
Inverted ligand field theory: Cu(CF3)4− square planar structure
Cu(CF3)4− square planar structure
Inverted ligand field theory: Interaction of the filled p band of P4−4 ring sublattice with Co d block bands in CoP3.[15][2]
Interaction of the filled p band of P4−4 ring sublattice with Co d block bands in CoP3.[15][2]
Inverted ligand field theory: MO diagrams of frontier orbitals of [Cu(CF3)4)n− anions.[2]
MO diagrams of frontier orbitals of [Cu(CF3)4)n− anions.[2]

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Inverted ligand field theory

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Inverted ligand field theory claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In chemistry, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Inverted ligand field theory before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Inverted ligand field theory ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Inverted ligand field theory

In research
Inverted ligand field theory appears in chemistry research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Inverted ligand field theory in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Inverted ligand field theory is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Chemical bonding, Inorganic chemistry, Transition metals, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Inverted ligand field theory outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Inverted ligand field theory” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Inverted ligand field theory in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Inverted ligand field theory means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Inverted ligand field theory out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Inverted ligand field theory in simple terms?

Inverted ligand field theory (ILFT) describes a phenomenon in the bonding of coordination complexes where the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital is primarily of ligand character. This is contrary to the traditional ligand field theory or crystal field theory picture and arises from the breaking do…

Why does Inverted ligand field theory matter?

Because it connects several chemistry ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Inverted ligand field theory?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Inverted ligand field theory.

Tags

  • Chemical bonding
  • Inorganic chemistry
  • Transition metals

Keep exploring