ArticleslgStudy

science

Journal of Historical Review

Journal of Historical Review is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Journal of Historical Review rather than just read about it. In short: The Journal of Historical Review was a non-peer-reviewed, pseudoacademic periodical focused on promoting Holocaust denial. It was published by the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), based in Torrance, California.

Journal of Historical Review — main illustration
Journal of Historical Review — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Journal of Historical Review belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Journal of Historical Review to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Journal of Historical Review from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Journal of Historical Review was a non-peer-reviewed, pseudoacademic periodical focused on promoting Holocaust denial. It was published by the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), based in Torrance, California. It ran quarterly from 1980 until 1992, and then bimonthly from 1993 until publication ceased due to financial issues in 2002.

History The journal was established in 1978 by the far-right political activist Willis Carto, derived from Carto's The American Mercury. Its first issue appeared in 1980. Its first editor was David McCalden, who then left the periodical in 1981 after a dispute with Carto. He was replaced by Tom Marcellus, who was replaced in February 1983 with Keith Stimely, until Stimely quit the IHR in February 1985 after he got into a dispute with Carto. The impetus for this was his claim that Carto had, without consulting him, removed part of an article by Robert Faurisson that was critical of David Irving (both Holocaust deniers) from the Journal. Stimely was replaced as editor by Robert Berkel, but he also left in 1988 after getting into a dispute with Carto. In 1985, Mark Weber joined the institute's editorial advisory committee and was made editor of the journal in 1992. He was the editor from then until the journal's end. Publication was suspended for a time due to the Mel Mermelstein case, which caused the IHR great financial difficulties. It was revived in 1988, with a magazine rather than academic style. This was accompanied by an aggressive marketing campaign, which increased the periodical's circulation to 7,000 from 4,500. Its circulation was at 6,000 in 1993, but this fell to 3,000 by the time of the periodical's end. In the 1980s, the IHR's members (principally Marcellus and Weber), seeing the IHR as a serious group, became increasingly embarrassed by how outspoken Carto was in his antisemitism; they also came into conflict over Carto's usage of funds (alleging he had stole several million dollars from them). in 1993, they wrote a document, published in the Journal, rebuking him and calling him a liability that had contributed little to the IHR. They voted to oust him and filed a lawsuit against Carto. After Carto was ousted, he launched another Holocaust denial magazine in 1994, The Barnes Review, as a competitor to the JHR. The journal commenced publication in the spring of 1980 as a quarterly periodical. No issues were published between April 1996 and May 1997. It continued until 2002, when it became defunct due to financial problems. After publication of the journal ceased, the IHR publishes its Bulletin only in an online format, although back issues are still made available on the Institute website.

Contents Its subject was primarily Holocaust denial, though other topics were discussed, if only at times to fill space. In terms of topics covered it was heavily European in orientation, though a majority of its contributors were Americans. The journal published original content but also sometimes reprinted articles from deceased authors to fill space. In an analysis of its contents, historian Stephen E. Atkins found that 34.4% of articles were on exclusively Holocaust denial articles, while "revisionist" history of all kinds (including on the Holocaust) was 41.5% of its coverage, and 13% was on topics unrelated to Holocaust denial. Its contents were initially academic in style, but following the 1988 revival were changed to a magazine format with photographs and colors. Writer Spencer Sunshine described it as the "premier Holocaust denial publication in the United States". The journal became a platform for Holocaust deniers around the world, with the editorial board including, among others, Germans Udo Walendy, Wilhelm Stäglich, and Georg Franz-Willing; French Robert Faurisson and Henri Roques; Argentinian W. Beweraggi-Allende, Australian John Tuson Bennett; Spanish Enrique Aynat; Italian Carlo Mattogno; and American M. A. R. Barker.

Editors David McCalden (1980–1981) Tom Marcellus (1981–1983) Keith Stimely (1983–1985) Robert Berkel (1985–1988) Mark Weber (1992–2002)

Reception The Journal's critics have included the Anti-Defamation League, the Danish Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, and scholars including Robert Hanyok, a National Security Agency historian, and many others who have described the journal as pseudo-scientific. Scholar of the radical right Jeffrey Kaplan called it a "serious-looking, pseudo-academic journal". Historian Stephen E. Atkins wrote that the contents of the journal were "cleverly intertwined between Holocaust denial and what might be considered as historical revisionism". Jonathan Petropoulos wrote in The History Teacher that the "[journal] is shockingly racist and antisemitic: articles on 'America's Failed Racial Policy' and anti-Israel pieces accompany those about gas chambers... They clearly have no business claiming to be a continuation of the revisionist tradition, and should be referred to as 'Holocaust Deniers'." Russian historians Igor Ryzhov and Maria Borodina commented that the fact that the Institute for Historical Review published its own historical journal "helped not only to unite the deniers into a single movement, but also to give their activities a form of pseudo-scientificness." The Organization of American Historians commissioned a study of the journal in which a panel had found that it was "nothing but a masquerade of scholarship".

References

Works cited Atkins, Stephen E. (2009). Holocaust Denial as an International Movement. Westport: Praeger Publishing. ISBN 978-0-313-34538-8. Coogan, Kevin (1999). Dreamer of the Day: Francis Parker Yockey and the Postwar Fascist International. Brooklyn: Autonomedia. ISBN 978-1-57027-039-0. Kaplan, Jeffrey, ed. (2000). Encyclopedia of White Power: A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press. ISBN 978-0-7425-0340-3. Michael, George (2008). Willis Carto and the American Far Right. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. ISBN 978-0-8130-3198-9. Sunshine, Spencer (2024). Neo-Nazi Terrorism and Countercultural Fascism: The Origins and Afterlife of James Mason's Siege. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-20009-0.

External links Official website

Illustrations

Journal of Historical Review illustration

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Journal of Historical Review

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Journal of Historical Review claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Journal of Historical Review before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Journal of Historical Review ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Journal of Historical Review

In research
Journal of Historical Review appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Journal of Historical Review in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Journal of Historical Review is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1980 establishments in California, 2002 disestablishments in California, Bimonthly journals, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Journal of Historical Review outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Journal of Historical Review” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Journal of Historical Review in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Journal of Historical Review means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Journal of Historical Review out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Journal of Historical Review in simple terms?

The Journal of Historical Review was a non-peer-reviewed, pseudoacademic periodical focused on promoting Holocaust denial. It was published by the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), based in Torrance, California.

Why does Journal of Historical Review matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Journal of Historical Review?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Journal of Historical Review.

Tags

  • 1980 establishments in California
  • 2002 disestablishments in California
  • Bimonthly journals
  • Far-right periodicals published in the United States
  • Fringe science journals
  • History journals
  • Holocaust denial
  • Holocaust denial in the United States
  • Holocaust historiography
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Jewish-American history
  • Magazines disestablished in 2002

Keep exploring