ArticleslgStudy

science

Judicial dissolution

Judicial dissolution is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Judicial dissolution rather than just read about it. In short: Judicial dissolution, informally called the corporate death penalty, is a legal procedure in which a corporation is forced to dissolve or cease to exist. Dissolution is the revocation of a corporation's charter for significant harm to society.

Judicial dissolution — main illustration
Judicial dissolution — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Judicial dissolution belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Judicial dissolution to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Judicial dissolution from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Judicial dissolution, informally called the corporate death penalty, is a legal procedure in which a corporation is forced to dissolve or cease to exist. Dissolution is the revocation of a corporation's charter for significant harm to society. In some countries, there are corporate manslaughter laws; however, almost all countries enable the revocation of a corporate charter. There have been numerous calls in the literature for a "corporate death penalty". In 2019, a study argued that industries that kill more people each year than they employ should have an industry-wide corporate death penalty. Some legal analysis has been done on the idea to revoke corporate charters for environmental violations such as for severe environmental pollution. Actual judicial dissolutions in the United States are rare. For example, Markoff has shown that no publicly traded company failed because of a criminal conviction that occurred between 2001 and 2010. Companies suggested as deserving the corporate death penalty include Eli Lilly & Company, Equifax, Unocal Corporation, and Wells Fargo. "If other examples in this volume were forced out of existence, this would send a message", John Hulpke wrote in the Journal of Management Inquiry in 2017. One argument against its use is that otherwise innocent employees and shareholders will lose money or their jobs. But author David Dayen argues in The New Republic that "the risk of a corporate death penalty should inspire active governance practices to protect their investments".

Examples

In 1890, New York's highest court revoked the charter of the North River Sugar Refining Corporation on the grounds that it was abusing its powers as a monopoly. In 2022, New York Supreme Court Judge Joel M. Cohen rejected a move by the state's Attorney General to dissolve the National Rifle Association of America. According to The Wall Street Journal, "the state's allegations of corruption and mismanagement by NRA top officials fell short of the public harm required to impose the 'corporate death penalty' on the nonprofit group". In 2023, numerous observers have described as a 'corporate death penalty' the order by a New York judge of the revocation of the business licenses of Donald Trump's businesses in the State of New York, which would force them into liquidation.

Alternatives In some jurisdictions, a judge or a government may have the freedom to:

Nationalise a corporation Fine it enough to force it to close Take employees to court Expel it Confiscate some of its assets Use competition law to break it up into separate entities

See also Corporate crime Corporate manslaughter Corporate personhood Capital punishment Decartelization

References

Illustrations

Judicial dissolution: Negligence, such as causing preventable disasters like the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, is one justification often cited by proponents of a corporate death penalty.[1]
Negligence, such as causing preventable disasters like the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, is one justification often cited by proponents of a corporate death penalty.[1]

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Judicial dissolution

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Judicial dissolution claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Judicial dissolution before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Judicial dissolution ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Judicial dissolution

In research
Judicial dissolution appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Judicial dissolution in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Judicial dissolution is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Anti-corporate activism, Corporate crime, Criminology, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Judicial dissolution outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Judicial dissolution in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Judicial dissolution means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Judicial dissolution out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Judicial dissolution in simple terms?

Judicial dissolution, informally called the corporate death penalty, is a legal procedure in which a corporation is forced to dissolve or cease to exist. Dissolution is the revocation of a corporation's charter for significant harm to society.

Why does Judicial dissolution matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Judicial dissolution?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Judicial dissolution.

Tags

  • Anti-corporate activism
  • Corporate crime
  • Criminology
  • Problems in business economics
  • United States corporate law

Keep exploring