ArticleslgStudy

science

Kom K and Kom W

Kom K and Kom W is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Kom K and Kom W rather than just read about it. In short: Kom K and Kom W are Neolithic archaeological sites in the northern Fayum region of Egypt dating to the mid-5th millennium BCE with evidence of human occupation for approximately three centuries (4650-4350 BCE) from the stratified hearth mounds. Radiocarbon dates from charcoal and botanicals found beyond the mounds yield older yet scattered dates well into the 6th millennium BCE.

Kom K and Kom W — main illustration
Kom K and Kom W — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Kom K and Kom W belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Kom K and Kom W to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Kom K and Kom W from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Kom K and Kom W are Neolithic archaeological sites in the northern Fayum region of Egypt dating to the mid-5th millennium BCE with evidence of human occupation for approximately three centuries (4650-4350 BCE) from the stratified hearth mounds. Radiocarbon dates from charcoal and botanicals found beyond the mounds yield older yet scattered dates well into the 6th millennium BCE. Both sites are situated near the shores of Lake Qarun, which was extensively researched for its water level fluctuation, due to shifts in the Nile floods and its effect on human occupation periods. Kom K and Kom W were both situated within 1 km of the lake during most of its human occupation periods when lake levels were much higher. The first academic fieldwork was carried out by archaeologist Gertrude Caton-Thompson and geologist Elinor Wight Gardner in the three seasons of 1924–5, 1925–6, and 1927–8. Kom K and Kom W yielded archaeological findings that differ from the culture units within the Egyptian Neolithic known at the time leading Caton-Thompson and Gardner to claim the sites as part of Fayum A and B cultures (also called the Faiyumian or Fayum Neolithic). The area has been re-investigated by the URU Fayum Project since 2004 where it has since been threatened by agriculture and development.

Kom K Discovered by Elinor Wight Gardner while she was mapping the area in the preliminary seasons, the Kom K mound measures 6568 m2 and is known for its early storage centers of grain. Radiocarbon dating of charcoal from the stratified Kom K mound places human occupation during the mid-5th millennium BCE, but samples from the hearths and pits near the mound show older dates from the mid-6th millennium BCE. 16 newly discovered hearths were found at the mound during a survey in 2006. Although cited as a village in older literature, recent studies show Kom K lacking in evidence of definite settlement structures that would convey permanent and continuous settlement. Rather, Kom K likely had intermittent occupation settlements and strong associations as a storage center, yet a village is not necessarily ruled out.

Granaries Kom K is distinguished by its two granary groups, the Upper and Lower K Pitts, the first is located about a half mile northeast of Kom K and the second is located a half mile north of Kom K and west of the first granary. Wheat and barley samples were taken from the Upper K Pits and were dated by radiocarbon to 4450 BCE. There were 183 pits identified by Caton-Thompson during her 3 field seasons of the mid-1920s. In the Upper K region, 67 pits were identified, 56 were silos, and the rest accounted for holes with pots, wooden artifacts and/or basketry inside. 42 of the silos were lined with coiled straw and 4 of them had a significant amount of cereal samples which were identified as a barley-wheat mixture. 13 additional pits were discovered by the URU Fayum Project in 2004, bringing the total number of pits in the Upper K region to 196. 7 of the newly discovered pits were identified as production areas for the desert clay, sand, crushed shell, and water mortar used to construct lids for the storage pits. In the second group 116 pits were identified, 109 of which were silos and the remaining 7 were large pot emplacements. Of the 109 silos, 38 were lined with either straw or reed (reed was not found in the Upper K Pits). These Lower K Pits were less preserved than the Upper K Pits.

Basketry In total, 80 of the pits at both the Upper and Lower K regions contained some sort of wheat straw and grass basketry lining. These basket linings would be important for protecting the grain from moisture and to keep it clean. Both Upper and Lower K Pits used a wheat straw and grass mix for the bundle, but preference of palm leaf or cyperaceae culm winders are seen in the Lower K Pits basketry, as opposed to using the wheat straw and grasses for winders.

Kom W

The Kom W mound covers an area of approximately 7196 m2 and was situated by an inlet of Lake Qarun whose clays and sands made the land arable. Surrounding the mound, lay a flat ground of lacustrine sandrock and a wind-blown sand layer that forms small dunes. These shifting dunes often reveal flint artifacts and pottery sherds. It was thought that Caton-Thompson excavated the entire mound, but 2-foot wide baulks between her original trenches were discovered in 2006. This allowed the use of contemporary technological analyses on the undisturbed stratified material, especially the use of dating techniques that were not possible in the 1920s. Radiocarbon dates place both Kom K and Kom W mound's occupation period at 4650-4350 BCE. 248 pits cut into the lacustrine deposits were discovered at the site with charcoal and botanics being recovered from some. Kom W is referred to be the origin of the "Fayum industry" by Caton-Thompson and Gardner. Like Kom K, Kom W was also cited as a village by Caton-Thompson, yet further archaeological research has not found any evidence of permanent structures.

Pottery The pottery found within the vicinity of Kom W was categorized into five different forms by Caton-Thompson: small bowls and cups, cooking bowls and pots, pedestalled cups, cups with knobbed feet, and rectangular dishes with peaked rims. Caton-Thompson interpreted 248 feature pits as hearths. The hearths of both Kom K and Kom W are slightly older than the mounds, dating from 5680 BCE. Among the identified feature pits of Kom W, 161 were empty, 55 contained some fragment or sherd of pottery, and 12 held complete ceramic vessels. Some of these vessels contained faunal bones of mostly fish and some small mammals.

Artifacts

Excavations at Kom K and W yielded a plethora of flint artifacts including axes, adzes, projectile points, concave base points, sickle blades, scrapers, tabular knives, gouges, microliths, and pebble-butted and pebble-backed tools. Excavations at Kom W also revealed a concentration of quern-stones around the area, which was not found at Kom K. Personal ornaments such as ostrich eggshell beads, bone rings, stone beads, and a fragment of a marine shell bracelet or large ring have been excavated at the sites.

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Kom K and Kom W: Egyptian neolithic serrated flint tool
Egyptian neolithic serrated flint tool
Kom K and Kom W: Egyptian neolithic hand axe
Egyptian neolithic hand axe

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Kom K and Kom W

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Kom K and Kom W claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Kom K and Kom W before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Kom K and Kom W ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Kom K and Kom W

In research
Kom K and Kom W appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Kom K and Kom W in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Kom K and Kom W is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Archaeological sites in Egypt, Grain production, Granaries, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Kom K and Kom W outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Kom K and Kom W” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Kom K and Kom W in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Kom K and Kom W means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Kom K and Kom W out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Kom K and Kom W in simple terms?

Kom K and Kom W are Neolithic archaeological sites in the northern Fayum region of Egypt dating to the mid-5th millennium BCE with evidence of human occupation for approximately three centuries (4650-4350 BCE) from the stratified hearth mounds. Radiocarbon dates from charcoal and botanicals found b…

Why does Kom K and Kom W matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Kom K and Kom W?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Kom K and Kom W.

Tags

  • Archaeological sites in Egypt
  • Grain production
  • Granaries
  • Neolithic settlements

Keep exploring