ArticleslgStudy

mathematics

Kuder–Richardson formulas

Kuder–Richardson formulas is a mathematics topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Kuder–Richardson formulas rather than just read about it. In short: In psychometrics, the Kuder–Richardson formulas, first published in 1937, are a measure of internal consistency reliability for measures with dichotomous choices. They were developed by Kuder and Richardson.

Key takeaways

  • Kuder–Richardson formulas belongs to mathematics; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Kuder–Richardson formulas to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Kuder–Richardson formulas from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

In psychometrics, the Kuder–Richardson formulas, first published in 1937, are a measure of internal consistency reliability for measures with dichotomous choices. They were developed by Kuder and Richardson.

Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) The name of this formula stems from the fact that is the twentieth formula discussed in Kuder and Richardson's seminal paper on test reliability. It is a special case of Cronbach's α, computed for dichotomous scores. It is often claimed that a high KR-20 coefficient (e.g., > 0.90) indicates a homogeneous test. However, like Cronbach's α, homogeneity (that is, unidimensionality) is actually an assumption, not a conclusion, of reliability coefficients. It is possible, for example, to have a high KR-20 with a multidimensional scale, especially with a large number of items. Values can range from 0.00 to 1.00 (sometimes expressed as 0 to 100), with high values indicating that the examination is likely to correlate with alternate forms (a desirable characteristic). The KR-20 may be affected by difficulty of the test, the spread in scores and the length of the examination. In the case when scores are not tau-equivalent (for example when there is not homogeneous but rather examination items of increasing difficulty) then the KR-20 is an indication of the lower bound of internal consistency (reliability). The formula for KR-20 for a test with K test items numbered i = 1 to K is

r = K K − 1 [ 1 − ∑ i = 1 K p i q i σ X 2 ] {\displaystyle r={\frac {K}{K-1}}\left[1-{\frac {\sum _{i=1}^{K}p_{i}q_{i}}{\sigma _{X}^{2}}}\right]}

where pi is the proportion of correct responses to test item i, qi is the proportion of incorrect responses to test item i (so that pi + qi = 1), and the variance for the denominator is

σ X 2 = ∑ i = 1 n ( X i − X ¯ ) 2

n . {\displaystyle \sigma _{X}^{2}={\frac {\sum _{i=1}^{n}(X_{i}-{\bar {X}})^{2}\,{}}{n}}.}

where n is the total sample size, X_i is the sum of items correct for the ith respondent and X ¯ {\displaystyle {\bar {X}}} is the mean of X_i values. If it is important to use unbiased operators then the sum of squares should be divided by degrees of freedom (n − 1) and the probabilities are multiplied by n / ( n − 1 ) . {\textstyle n/(n-1).}

Kuder–Richardson Formula 21 (KR-21) Often discussed in tandem with KR-20, is Kuder–Richardson Formula 21 (KR-21). KR-21 is a simplified version of KR-20, which can be used when the difficulty of all items on the test are known to be equal. Like KR-20, KR-21 was first set forth as the twenty-first formula discussed in Kuder and Richardson's 1937 paper. The formula for KR-21 is as such:

r = K K − 1 [ 1 − K p ( 1 − p ) σ X 2 ] {\displaystyle r={\frac {K}{K-1}}\left[1-{\frac {Kp(1-p)}{\sigma _{X}^{2}}}\right]}

Similarly to KR-20, K is equal to the number of items. Difficulty level of the items (p), is assumed to be the same for each item, however, in practice, KR-21 can be applied by finding the average item difficulty across the entirety of the test. KR-21 tends to be a more conservative estimate of reliability than KR-20, which in turn is a more conservative estimate than Cronbach's α.

References

External links Quality of assessment chapter in Illinois State Assessment handbook (1995)

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Kuder–Richardson formulas

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Kuder–Richardson formulas claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In mathematics, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Kuder–Richardson formulas before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Kuder–Richardson formulas ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Kuder–Richardson formulas

In research
Kuder–Richardson formulas appears in mathematics research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Kuder–Richardson formulas in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Kuder–Richardson formulas is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Comparison of assessments, Psychometrics, Statistical reliability, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Kuder–Richardson formulas outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Kuder–Richardson formulas” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Kuder–Richardson formulas in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Kuder–Richardson formulas means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Kuder–Richardson formulas out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Kuder–Richardson formulas in simple terms?

In psychometrics, the Kuder–Richardson formulas, first published in 1937, are a measure of internal consistency reliability for measures with dichotomous choices. They were developed by Kuder and Richardson.

Why does Kuder–Richardson formulas matter?

Because it connects several mathematics ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Kuder–Richardson formulas?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Kuder–Richardson formulas.

Tags

  • Comparison of assessments
  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical reliability

Keep exploring