Kuruvilla Pandikattu Joseph, SJ (; born 28 November 1957) is an Indian Catholic priest and philosopher. He is Professor (Emeritus) of Philosophy, Science and Religion at Jnana Deepa, Institute of Philosophy and Theology, Pune, Maharashtra, India. He was also Director of JDV Centre for Science-Religion Studies (JCSR) and Association of Science, Society and Religion (ASSR), Pune. He has authored/edited 36 books and written more than 160 academic articles. He is also a co-founder and has been a co-publisher of two journals, Jnanadeepa: Pune Journal of Religious Studies and AUC: Asian Journal of Religious Studies. Furthermore, he has organized more than 40 academic conferences. His weekly column on "Contemporary Spirituality" used to appear on Tuesdays in Financial Chronicle for eight years. He has been contributing regularly to both academic and popular journals. He is involved in science-religion dialogue and science-related activities and teaches courses on them as well. His areas of interest (and specialization) include: Science-Religion Dialogue; Philosophical Anthropology (Emerich Coreth); Hermeneutics (Paul Ricœur) and inter-religious dialogue (Bede Griffiths).
Early life and influences Pandikattu was born in Areekara, Kerala, India He was born to Uthuppan and Mary Joseph. He had his early education at Government LP School, Veliyannoor (1962–65) and St. Rockey's U.P. School, Areekara (1965–70). Then he pursued his basic studies at Sacred Heart School, Changanassery, Kerala (1970–73), India. After completing his School Secondary Leaving Certificate (S.S.L.C.) at Changanassery, he left for Guhiajori, Dumka, Bihar (now Jharkhand). Other places of his studies are: St. Xavier's School, Sahibganj (1976–78); Loyola College, Chennai (1978–81); St. Joseph's College, Trichy (1981–83); Jnana Deepa, Institute of Philosophy and Theology, Pune (1983–85), and University of Pune (1988–91).
Philosophical Approach
The starting points of Pandikattu's academic research are physics, philosophy (metaphysics) and religion (theology). He became interested in the quest for the unification of the fourfold forces of nature in physics and the hermeneutics of dialogue by Paul Ricoeur. This led him to explore the interpretive and symbolic (or mythic) nature of religious experience and inspired his first doctoral thesis: Idols to die, so that symbols might live. He traces the idol-symbol tension back to every aspect of human experience.
Human Being: Between Before and Beyond Evoking the tensional and paradoxical life of human beings, he holds on to a dynamic and humanistic understanding of human beings, who transcend their own self-understanding and definitions. Human being is the tensional appropriation between the past and the future, the memory and hope, the actual and the potential. It is in this tensional existence that human beings realise their own ever-evolving nature, including that of bound freedom and limited relationship. As bound to freedom, they are finite beings seeking the infinite. Experiencing limited love, they want to widen the horizon of understanding. Based on the concrete experiences of pleasure, they are open to the infinite bliss that remains open and ever elusive. Thus, he concludes that humans are free, to a very limited extent. This limited freedom provides him with the dignity and worth that they possess. They are capable of genuine love, also to a very limited extent, and establishing relationships, in spite of the contrary claims and experiences.
Death: Live It! As part of the dynamically tensional existence, human beings are “being-unto-death,” where the possibility of their own impossibility is always on the horizon. At the same time, he is convinced that only "Once you learn how to die, you learn how to live" (Mitch Albom). ' Further, following Michel de Montaigne we may hold that “To philosophize is to learn to die.” So, as human beings, we are called to live gratefully and accept death gracefully! The paradox of life is when we recognise the depth of life, we also experience the depth of death! Further, as human beings, we need to take seriously the possibility of our own collective annihilation (Sixth Mass Extinction, Ecological Crises, etc.) or enhancement (Artificial Intelligence, Technological Singularity, Moral Creativity, etc.).
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.




