ArticleslgStudy

biology

Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring

Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring is a biology topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring rather than just read about it. In short: Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring (German: Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses) or "Sterilisation Law" was a statute in Nazi Germany enacted on 14 July 1933, (and made active in January 1934) which allowed the compulsory sterilisation of any citizen who in the opinion of a "Genetic Health Court" (Erbgesundheitsgericht) suffered from a list of alleged genetic disorders – many of which w…

Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring — main illustration
Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring belongs to biology; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring (German: Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses) or "Sterilisation Law" was a statute in Nazi Germany enacted on 14 July 1933, (and made active in January 1934) which allowed the compulsory sterilisation of any citizen who in the opinion of a "Genetic Health Court" (Erbgesundheitsgericht) suffered from a list of alleged genetic disorders – many of which were not, in fact, genetic. The elaborate interpretive commentary on the law was written by three dominant figures in the racial hygiene movement: Ernst Rüdin, Arthur Gütt and the lawyer Falk Ruttke. While it has close resemblances with the American Model Eugenical Sterilization Law developed by Harry H. Laughlin, the law itself was initially drafted in 1932, at the end of the Weimar Republic period, by a committee led by the Prussian health board.

Operation of the law

The basic provisions of the 1933 law stated that:

(1) Any person suffering from a hereditary disease may be rendered incapable of procreation by means of a surgical operation (sterilization), if the experience of medical science shows that it is highly probable that his descendants would suffer from some serious physical or mental hereditary defect. (2) For the purposes of this law, any person will be considered as hereditarily diseased who is suffering from any one of the following diseases:–

(1) Congenital Mental Deficiency, (2) Schizophrenia, (3) Manic-Depressive Insanity, (4) Hereditary Epilepsy, (5) Hereditary Chorea (Huntington's), (6) Hereditary Blindness, (7) Hereditary Deafness, (8) Any severe hereditary deformity. (3) Any person suffering from severe alcoholism may be also rendered incapable of procreation. The law applied to anyone in the general population, making its scope significantly larger than the compulsory sterilisation laws in the United States, which generally were only applicable on people in psychiatric hospitals or prisons. The 1933 law created a large number of "Genetic Health Courts" (German: Erbgesundheitsgericht, EGG), consisting of a judge, a medical officer, and medical practitioner, which "shall decide at its own discretion after considering the results of the whole proceedings and the evidence tendered". If the court decided that the person in question was to be sterilised, the decision could be appealed to the "Higher Genetic Health Court" (German: Erbgesundheitsobergericht, EGOG). If the appeal failed, the sterilization was to be carried out, with the law specifying that "the use of force is permissible". The law also required that people seeking voluntary sterilizations also go through the courts. There were three amendments by 1935, most making minor adjustments to how the statute operated or clarifying bureaucratic aspects (such as who paid for the operations). The most significant changes allowed the Higher Court to renounce a patient's right to appeal, and to fine physicians who did not report patients who they knew would qualify for sterilisation under the law. The law also enforced sterilization on the so-called "Rhineland bastards," the mixed-race children of German civilians and French African soldiers who helped occupy the Rhineland. At the time of its enaction, the German government pointed to the success of sterilisation laws elsewhere, especially the work in California documented by the American eugenicists E. S. Gosney and Paul Popenoe, as evidence of the humaneness and efficacy of such laws. Eugenicists abroad admired the German law for its legal and ideological clarity. Popenoe himself wrote that "the German law is well drawn and, in form, may be considered better than the sterilization laws of most American states", and trusted in the German government's "conservative, sympathetic, and intelligent administration" of the law, praising the "scientific leadership" of the Nazis. The German mathematician Otfrid Mittmann defended the law against "unfavorable judgements". In the first year of the law's operation, 1934, 84,600 cases were brought to Genetic Health Courts, with 62,400 forced sterilisations. Nearly 4,000 people appealed against the decisions of sterilisation authorities; 3,559 of the appeals failed. In 1935, it was 88,100 trials and 71,700 sterilizations. By the end of the Nazi regime, over 200 "Genetic Health Courts" were created, and under their rulings over 400,000 people were sterilized against their will. Along with the law, Adolf Hitler personally decriminalised abortion in case of fetuses having racial or hereditary defects for doctors, while the abortion of healthy "pure" German, "Aryan" unborn remained strictly forbidden.

See also Life unworthy of life Aktion T4 Nazi eugenics Eugenics in the United States

Notes

External links "Eugenics in Germany : 'The Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring'" article from Facing History and Ourselves United States Holocaust Memorial Museum – The Biological State: Nazi Racial Hygiene, 1933–1939

Illustrations

Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring: Gütt-Rüdin-Ruttke a
Gütt-Rüdin-Ruttke a
Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring: Reich Law Gazette on 25 July 1933: Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring.
Reich Law Gazette on 25 July 1933: Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In biology, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring

In research
Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring appears in biology research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1933 establishments in Germany, 1933 in law, Abortion law, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring in simple terms?

Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring (German: Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses) or "Sterilisation Law" was a statute in Nazi Germany enacted on 14 July 1933, (and made active in January 1934) which allowed the compulsory sterilisation of any citizen who in the opinion…

Why does Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring matter?

Because it connects several biology ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring.

Tags

  • 1933 establishments in Germany
  • 1933 in law
  • Abortion law
  • Compulsory sterilization
  • Law of Nazi Germany
  • Nazi eugenics
  • Race and intelligence controversy
  • Racial antisemitism
  • Scientific racism

Keep exploring