ArticleslgStudy

science

Lexical–gustatory synesthesia

Lexical–gustatory synesthesia is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Lexical–gustatory synesthesia rather than just read about it. In short: Lexical–gustatory synesthesia is a rare form of synesthesia in which spoken and written language (as well as some colors and emotions) causes individuals to experience an automatic and highly consistent taste/smell. The taste is often experienced as a complex mixture of both temperature and texture.

Key takeaways

  • Lexical–gustatory synesthesia belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Lexical–gustatory synesthesia to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Lexical–gustatory synesthesia from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Lexical–gustatory synesthesia is a rare form of synesthesia in which spoken and written language (as well as some colors and emotions) causes individuals to experience an automatic and highly consistent taste/smell. The taste is often experienced as a complex mixture of both temperature and texture. For example, in a particular synaesthete, JIW, the word jail would taste of cold, hard bacon. Synesthetic tastes are evoked by an inducer/concurrent complex. The inducer is the stimulus that activates the sensation and the taste experience is the concurrent.

Experimental studies There are many scientific standards in use to determine if a person actually has the genuine neurological condition of lexical–gustatory synesthesia. Scientists check for the behavioral hallmark of a significantly higher retest consistency after at least a year compared to control groups. Another scientific standard method to determine the legitimacy of ones synesthesia is to use Functional magnetic resonance imaging or functional MRI (fMRI) to determine which areas of the brain are active during the scan. A final method utilized by the prominent neuroscientist, V.S. Ramachandran, is the galvanic skin response (GSR). The GSR measures any fluctuations in the electrical resistance of skin. A high GSR could indicate that a person might be lying about their synesthesia condition. No GSR indicates that a person would be telling the truth about their synesthesia.

Experiences and phonological roots There are many forms of lexical–gustatory synesthesia and the various taste sensations linked to the neurological condition vary widely from synesthete to synesthete. Examples of many well-known synesthetic taste experiences are recorded in case studies with singular participants that demonstrate the variability of the condition. In one case, PS is a patient that has taste experiences that happen in her head and not her mouth. Her tastes usually have both texture and temperature associated with the sensation. Some forms of lexical–gustatory synesthesia are triggered by thinking of the word's meaning, rather than its sound or spelling. Others are triggered by hearing or reading an inducer word. In many forms, more well-known words and words used with a higher frequency are more likely to have a strong taste association The phonological roots associated with this form of synesthesia drive the current research on lexical–gustatory synesthesia to determine which parts of the brain are active in synesthetes causing the neurological cross-talk condition and how the findings may relate to neurologically normal persons.

Tip of the tongue studies Tip of the tongue (TOT) studies refer to studies when higher order characteristics of words such as the meaning, concept, or its syntactic category are retrieved from memory. These characteristics are called the lexeme of a word. Tip of tongue studies have shown that a word's lemma may be responsible for eliciting a taste sensation, not its phonologic sound or spelling. Further TOT studies determined the possibility that during TOT states, lexemes could be partially activated to yield phoneme-triggered tastes.

Case studies

JIW JIW is a synesthete who automatically experiences tastes in and around his mouth when he hears words. He describes his tastes to be very similar to real tastes experienced when eating, but without the substance. JIW's case study to evaluate the consistency in a series of re-tests began in the late 1970s. In 2006, exactly 27 years after his initial study, JIW and a group of ten controls who were not a part of the original study were re-tested using words from original 1970s study. The controls were instructed that they would be immediately retested on their inducer-concurrent associations. The results of the 2006 study indicated that the controls had a mean consistency of about 47.9% while JIW had maintained a consistency of 100%. JIW's tastes are largely correlated to foods that he would have eaten as a child. He is around ten times more likely to associate a word to the taste of chocolate than he would to the taste of something he experienced as an adult, such as beer or coffee. For example, when JIW hears a common word such as "this", he experiences the tastes of 'bread soaked in tomato soup'. Bread and tomato soup would have been common flavors JIW experienced in his childhood. It is hypothesized that some or all forms of lexical–gustatory synesthesia may trigger during early childhood development and lead to the over-representation of the flavors of childhood foods. Both consistency studies and fMRI scans have validated JIW's lexical–gustatory synesthesia. A fMRI scan showed the bilateral activation of the Broca's area 43 in the brain during JIW's taste experiences. The Broca's area 43 is a part of the primary gustatory cortex which is responsible for the perception of taste. Further studies of the underlying brain regions involved in synesthetes like JIW could aid in identifying the root physiological mechanisms involved in lexical–gustatory synesthesia.

SC SC is a synesthete who automatically experiences smells, tastes, and feelings of textures in her mouth and throat when she reads, speaks, or hears language, music, and certain environmental sounds. In SC's case study, researchers utilized fMRI to determine the areas of the brain that were activated during her synesthetic experiences. They compared areas of activation in SC's brain to those found in literature for other synesthetes, speech processing, language, and sound processing. In SC's scans, two important regions of the brain were largely activated during her taste sensations: the left anterior insula and the left superior parietal lobe. The scans led researchers to speculate that the anterior insula may play a role in SC's taste experiences while the superior parietal lobe binds together all of the sensory information for processing. Based on the findings of this study and others like it, it could be possible to determine the type of inducer that leads to synesthetic sensations based on the patterns of brain activity.

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Lexical–gustatory synesthesia

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Lexical–gustatory synesthesia claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Lexical–gustatory synesthesia before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Lexical–gustatory synesthesia ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Lexical–gustatory synesthesia

In research
Lexical–gustatory synesthesia appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Lexical–gustatory synesthesia in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Lexical–gustatory synesthesia is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Synesthesia, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Lexical–gustatory synesthesia outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Lexical–gustatory synesthesia” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Lexical–gustatory synesthesia in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Lexical–gustatory synesthesia means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Lexical–gustatory synesthesia out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Lexical–gustatory synesthesia in simple terms?

Lexical–gustatory synesthesia is a rare form of synesthesia in which spoken and written language (as well as some colors and emotions) causes individuals to experience an automatic and highly consistent taste/smell. The taste is often experienced as a complex mixture of both temperature and texture.

Why does Lexical–gustatory synesthesia matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Lexical–gustatory synesthesia?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Lexical–gustatory synesthesia.

Tags

  • Synesthesia

Keep exploring