ArticleslgStudy

science

Linguistic typology

Linguistic typology is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Linguistic typology rather than just read about it. In short: Linguistic typology (or language typology) is a field of linguistics that studies and classifies languages according to their structural features to allow their comparison. Its aim is to describe and explain the structural diversity and the common properties of the world's languages.

Key takeaways

  • Linguistic typology belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Linguistic typology to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Linguistic typology from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Linguistic typology (or language typology) is a field of linguistics that studies and classifies languages according to their structural features to allow their comparison. Its aim is to describe and explain the structural diversity and the common properties of the world's languages. Its subdisciplines include, but are not limited to: phonological typology, which deals with sound features; syntactic typology, which deals with word order and form; lexical typology, which deals with language vocabulary; and theoretical typology, which aims to explain the universal tendencies. Linguistic typology is contrasted with genealogical linguistics on the grounds that typology groups languages or their grammatical features based on formal similarities rather than historic descendence. The issue of genealogical relation is however relevant to typology because modern data sets aim to be representative and unbiased. Samples are collected evenly from different language families and emphasize the importance of lesser-known languages in gaining insight into human language.

History Speculations of the existence of a (logical) general or universal grammar underlying all languages were published in the Middle Ages, especially by the Modistae school. At the time, Latin was the model language of linguistics although transcribing Irish and Icelandic into the Latin alphabet was found to be problematic. The cross-linguistic dimension of linguistics was established during the Renaissance. For example, Grammaticae quadrilinguis partitiones (1544) by Johannes Drosaeus compared French and the three "holy languages:" Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. The approach was expanded by the Port-Royal Grammar (1660) of Antoine Arnauld and Claude Lancelot, who added Spanish, Italian, German, and Arabic. Nicolas Beauzée's 1767 book includes examples of English, Swedish, Lappish, Irish, Welsh, Basque, Quechua, and Chinese. The conquest and the conversion of the world by Europe gave rise to "missionary linguistics," which produced first-hand word lists and grammatical descriptions of exotic languages. That work is accounted for in the "Catalogue of the Languages of the Populations We Know" (1800) by the Spanish Jesuit Lorenzo Hervás. Johann Christoph Adelung collected the first large language sample with the Lord's Prayer in almost 500 languages (posthumous, 1817). More developed 19th-century comparative works include Franz Bopp's 'Conjugation System' (1816) and Wilhelm von Humboldt's "On the Difference in Human Linguistic Structure and Its Influence on the Intellectual Development of Mankind" (posthumous, 1836). In 1818, August Wilhelm Schlegel made a classification of the world's languages that had three types: (i) languages lacking grammatical structure like Chinese; (ii) agglutinative languages like Turkish; and (iii) inflectional languages, which can be synthetic like Latin and Ancient Greek, or analytic like French. The idea was later developed by others including August Schleicher, Heymann Steinthal, Franz Misteli, Franz Nicolaus Finck, and Max Müller. The word "typology" was proposed by Georg von der Gabelentz in his Sprachwissenschaft (1891). Louis Hjelmslev proposed typology as a large-scale empirical-analytical endeavor of comparing grammatical features to uncover the essence of language. Such a project began from the 1961 conference on language universals at Dobbs Ferry. Speakers included Roman Jakobson, Charles F. Hockett, and Joseph Greenberg, who proposed 45 different types of linguistic universals, based on his data sets from 30 languages. Greenberg's findings were mostly known from the 19th-century grammarians, but his systematic presentation of them would serve as a model for modern typology. Winfred P. Lehmann introduced Greenbergian typological theory to Indo-European studies in the 1970s. During the 20th century, typology based on missionary linguistics became centered on SIL International, which today hosts its catalogue of living languages, Ethnologue, as an online database. The Greenbergian, or universalist, approach is accounted for by the World Atlas of Language Structures, among others. Typology is also done within the frameworks of functional grammar including functional discourse grammar, role and reference grammar, and systemic functional linguistics. During the early years of the 21st century, however, the existence of linguistic universals became questioned by linguists proposing evolutionary typology.

Method Quantitative typology deals with the distribution and the co-occurrence of structural patterns in the languages of the world. Major types of non-chance distribution include:

preferences (for instance, absolute and implicational universals, semantic maps, and hierarchies) correlations (for instance, areal patterns, such as with a Sprachbund) Linguistic universals are patterns that can be seen cross-linguistically. Universals can either be absolute, meaning that every documented language exhibits the characteristic, or statistical, meaning that the characteristic is either seen in most languages or probable in most languages. Universals, both absolute and statistical, can be unrestricted, meaning that they apply to most or all languages without any additional conditions. Conversely, both absolute and statistical universals can be restricted or implicational, meaning that a characteristic is true on the condition of something else (if Y characteristic is true, then X characteristic is true). An example of an implicational hierarchy is that dual pronouns are found only in languages with plural pronouns, and singular pronouns (or those unspecified in terms of number) are found in all languages. The implicational hierarchy is thus singular < plural < dual (etc.). Qualitative typology develops cross-linguistically viable notions or types that provide a framework for the description and comparison of languages.

Subfields The main subfields of linguistic typology include the empirical fields of syntactic, phonological and lexical typology. Additionally, theoretical typology aims to explain the empirical findings, especially statistical tendencies or implicational hierarchies.

Syntactic typology

Syntactic typology studies a vast array of grammatical phenomena from the languages of the world. Two well-known issues include dominant order and left-right symmetry.

Dominant order One set of types reflects the basic order of subject, verb, and direct object in sentences:

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Linguistic typology

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Linguistic typology claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Linguistic typology before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Linguistic typology ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Linguistic typology

In research
Linguistic typology appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Linguistic typology in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Linguistic typology is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Language comparison, Linguistic typology, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Linguistic typology outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Linguistic typology” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Linguistic typology in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Linguistic typology means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Linguistic typology out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Linguistic typology in simple terms?

Linguistic typology (or language typology) is a field of linguistics that studies and classifies languages according to their structural features to allow their comparison. Its aim is to describe and explain the structural diversity and the common properties of the world's languages.

Why does Linguistic typology matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Linguistic typology?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Linguistic typology.

Tags

  • Language comparison
  • Linguistic typology

Keep exploring