ArticleslgStudy

science

Marlborough fault system

Marlborough fault system is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Marlborough fault system rather than just read about it. In short: The Marlborough fault system (also known as Marlborough tectonic domain) is a set of four large dextral strike-slip faults and other related structures in the northern part of the South Island, New Zealand, which transfer displacement between the mainly transform plate boundary of the Alpine fault and the mainly destructive boundary of the Kermadec Trench, and together form the boundary between the Australian and Pa…

Marlborough fault system — main illustration
Marlborough fault system — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Marlborough fault system belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Marlborough fault system to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Marlborough fault system from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Marlborough fault system (also known as Marlborough tectonic domain) is a set of four large dextral strike-slip faults and other related structures in the northern part of the South Island, New Zealand, which transfer displacement between the mainly transform plate boundary of the Alpine fault and the mainly destructive boundary of the Kermadec Trench, and together form the boundary between the Australian and Pacific plates.

Geometry The Marlborough fault system consists of four main dominantly strike-slip fault strands, which together carry almost all of the displacement associated with the plate boundary. Estimates of the rate of current displacement for total strike-slip across the system are between 39 mm (1.5 in)/year to 48 mm (1.9 in)/year. This has meant up to 450 m (1,480 ft) of relative plate motion in less than 14,000 years. Other smaller faults form as splays of these main faults or accommodate deformation of the crust between them, such as the Newton and Hura Faults at the western end of the Hope Fault and the Jordan Thrust that formed the Seaward Kaikōura Range. The dextral strike-slip across this zone has also involved clockwise rotation of the intervening fault blocks of about 20° since the early Pliocene. The Hope Fault is the southern limit of the Marlborough fault system and faults to the south of it, even quite close by, are regarded as part of the Northern Canterbury domain.

Development It appears from the latest studies of the rupture complexity of the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake that the myriad of faults associated with deformation episodes over the past 100 million years are important to propagation of rupture in large events in the southern part of the Marlborough fault system as due to their reorientation they act as reactivated interconnections between the current major now dominant strike-slip faults. Retrospective studies of the other large historic events in the Marlborough fault system show that this is not typical in the northeast or central parts of the system. Such faults might include implicate reverse faults from a Gondwana subduction zone before 100 million years ago, but more definitely appear to relate to both low and high angle normal faults associated with Gondwana breakup and opening of the Tasman Sea between 105 and 60 million years ago and the reverse faults associated with the uplift of the Inland Kaikōura Mountains between 35 million to 25 million years ago due to the start of convergence of the current plate boundary were created. Further analysis shows that the mutual plate movement has been all effectively accommodated in the region itself, over the last 14,000 odd years by ruptures in size, space and time of the four main fault strands. Modelling the measured Hope, Clarence, Awatere and Wairau fault displacements show that they keep up, over periods of less than a 1000 years and a few tens of metres with the plate movement. This was the first proof of a common assumption that had been made by some seismologists of the processes in tectonic related earthquake systems, as opposed to individual faults. An ancestral fault system formed between 25 and 8 million years ago with the full development of the Hikurangi subduction margin which was associated with marked vertical axis rotations. There was progressive development of the modern Marlborough fault system after this from the north towards the south during the early Pliocene, with the Hope Fault complex forming no more than 2 million years ago and current formation to the south of the Hope Fault of a new fault complex, in response to a change in plate motions. This new zone in Canterbury has been termed the Porters Pass–Amberley Fault Zone. The new plate vector is significantly oblique to the Alpine Fault, causing an increased amount of convergence. A set of strike-slip faults formed to accommodate this change by taking up most of the strike-slip component.

Faults There are four main fault strands, being the Hope, Clarence, Awatere and Wairau faults, although many other smaller faults, of either strike-slip or thrust type are known.

Main faults

Hope Fault

The Hope Fault forms the southernmost part of the Marlborough fault system. The estimated slip-rate during the Holocene is 0.2–0.25 cm/year (0.079–0.098 in/year), just over half of the plate boundary displacement. At its northeastern end it links into the Jordan Thrust and most of the displacement is transferred onto that structure. It takes its name from the Hope River, which runs along one of the central fault segments. The Kekerengu Fault and Jordan Thrust are closely associated with the Hope Fault. It did not undergo significant rupture in the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake although there was minor motion on its seaward aspects, and some off fault uplift to its south except near the Northern Canterbury domain Conway-Charwell Fault which is parallel, and did rupture only a few hundreds of metres away. After the main shock sequence there were aftershocks clustered to its south in the region of the Conway-Charwell Fault.

Clarence Fault

The Clarence Fault runs from close to the Alpine Fault to about 10 km (6.2 mi) west of Ward, where it appears to terminate abruptly. A Holocene slip-rate of 0.35–0.5 cm/year (0.14–0.20 in/year) is estimated for this fault. At the surface the displacement appears to be nearly pure horizontal, but continuous uplift of the neighbouring Inner Kaikōura Range over the same period, suggests that some of the dip-slip component thought to be present at depth on the fault zone is transferred onto thrust or reverse faults under the range. An extra 10° of clockwise rotation has been recognised within the block that lies northeast of the tip of the Clarence fault. It takes its name from the Waiau Toa / Clarence River, which follows the fault trace in the northeastern section of the fault.

Awatere Fault

It is formed of two main segments; the Molesworth section to the southwest and the Eastern section to the northeast. The estimated recent slip-rate for the Molesworth section is 0.44 cm/year (0.17 in/year). It takes its name from the Awatere River whose valley follows the fault trace along some of its length.

Wairau Fault

The Wairau Fault is sometimes regarded as a direct continuation of the Alpine Fault and may be referred to as the Alpine-Wairau Fault. It takes its name from the Wairau River, which follows the fault trace for most of its length. It has an estimated slip-rate of 0.3–0.5 cm/year (0.12–0.20 in/year).

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Marlborough fault system illustration
Marlborough fault system: Major active fault zones of New Zealand showing variation in displacement vector of Pacific plate relative to Australian plate along the boundary
Major active fault zones of New Zealand showing variation in displacement vector of Pacific plate relative to Australian plate along the boundary

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Marlborough fault system

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Marlborough fault system claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Marlborough fault system before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Marlborough fault system ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Marlborough fault system

In research
Marlborough fault system appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Marlborough fault system in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Marlborough fault system is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Geographic areas of seismological interest, Seismic faults of New Zealand, Seismic zones of New Zealand, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Marlborough fault system outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Marlborough fault system” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Marlborough fault system in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Marlborough fault system means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Marlborough fault system out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Marlborough fault system in simple terms?

The Marlborough fault system (also known as Marlborough tectonic domain) is a set of four large dextral strike-slip faults and other related structures in the northern part of the South Island, New Zealand, which transfer displacement between the mainly transform plate boundary of the Alpine fault…

Why does Marlborough fault system matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Marlborough fault system?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Marlborough fault system.

Tags

  • Geographic areas of seismological interest
  • Seismic faults of New Zealand
  • Seismic zones of New Zealand

Keep exploring