ArticleslgStudy

chemistry

Multipole density formalism

Multipole density formalism is a chemistry topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Multipole density formalism rather than just read about it. In short: The Multipole Density Formalism (also referred to as Hansen-Coppens Formalism) is an X-ray crystallography method of electron density modelling proposed by Niels K. Hansen and Philip Coppens in 1978.

Multipole density formalism — main illustration
Multipole density formalism — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Multipole density formalism belongs to chemistry; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Multipole density formalism to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Multipole density formalism from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Multipole Density Formalism (also referred to as Hansen-Coppens Formalism) is an X-ray crystallography method of electron density modelling proposed by Niels K. Hansen and Philip Coppens in 1978. Unlike the commonly used Independent Atom Model, the Hansen-Coppens Formalism presents an aspherical approach, allowing one to model the electron distribution around a nucleus separately in different directions and therefore describe numerous chemical features of a molecule inside the unit cell of an examined crystal in detail.

Theory

Independent Atom Model The Independent Atom Model (abbreviated to IAM), upon which the Multipole Model is based, is a method of charge density modelling. It relies on an assumption that electron distribution around the atom is isotropic, and that therefore charge density is dependent only on the distance from a nucleus. The choice of the radial function used to describe this electron density is arbitrary, granted that its value at the origin is finite. In practice either Gaussian- or Slater-type 1s-orbital functions are used. Due to its simplistic approach, this method provides a straightforward model that requires no additional parameters (other than positional and Debye–Waller factors) to be refined. This allows the IAM to perform satisfactorily while a relatively low amount of data from the diffraction experiment is available. However, the fixed shape of the singular basis function prevents any detailed description of aspherical atomic features.

Kappa Formalism In order to adjust some valence shell parameters, the Kappa formalism was proposed. It introduces two additional refineable parameters: an outer shell population (denoted as P v a l {\displaystyle P_{val}} ) and its expansion/contraction ( κ {\displaystyle \kappa } ). Therefore, the electron density is formulated as:

ρ a t o m = ρ c o r e + ρ v a l e n c e ′ ( κ r ) = ρ c o r e + P v a l κ 3 ρ v a l ( κ r ) {\displaystyle \rho _{atom}=\rho _{core}+\rho '_{valence}(\kappa r)=\rho _{core}+P_{val}\kappa ^{3}\rho _{val}(\kappa r)}

While P v a l {\displaystyle P_{val}} , being responsible for the charge flow part, is linearly coupled with partial charge, the normalised κ {\displaystyle \kappa } parameter scales radial coordinate r {\displaystyle r} . Therefore, lowering the κ {\displaystyle \kappa } parameter results in expansion of the outer shell and, conversely, raising it results in contraction. Although the Kappa formalism is still, strictly speaking, a spherical method, it is an important step towards understanding modern approaches as it allows one to distinguish chemically different atoms of the same element.

Multipole description In the multipole model description, the charge density around a nucleus is given by the following equation:

ρ a t o m ( r , θ , ϕ ) = P c o r e ρ c o r e ( r ) + P v a l κ 3 ρ v a l ( κ r ) + ∑ l = 0 l m a x κ ′ 3 R l ( κ ′ r ) ∑ m = − l l P l m ± Y l m ± ( θ , ϕ ) {\displaystyle \rho _{atom}(r,\theta ,\phi )=P_{core}\rho _{core}(r)+P_{val}\kappa ^{3}\rho _{val}(\kappa r)+\sum _{l=0}^{l_{max}}\kappa '^{3}R_{l}(\kappa 'r)\sum _{m=-l}^{l}P_{lm\pm }Y_{lm\pm }(\theta ,\phi )}

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Multipole density formalism: Isosurface of static electron density for doxycycline resulting from the Multipole Model refinement at 
  
    
      
        1.5
        
          
            Å
          
        
        
          /
        
        
          e
          
            3
          
        
      
    
    {\displaystyle 1.5\mathrm {\AA} /e^{3}}
  
 level.
Isosurface of static electron density for doxycycline resulting from the Multipole Model refinement at 1.5 Å / e 3 {\displaystyle 1.5\mathrm {\AA} /e^{3}} level.
Multipole density formalism: Equivalent isosurface resulting from the Independent Atom Model. Notice the lack of covalent bonds' electrons.
Equivalent isosurface resulting from the Independent Atom Model. Notice the lack of covalent bonds' electrons.
Multipole density formalism: Visual representations of a few real spherical harmonics used in Multipole Density Formalism. The distance of the surface from the origin is proportional to the value for given angles, while the color denotes the sign (blue for positive, yellow for negative).
Visual representations of a few real spherical harmonics used in Multipole Density Formalism. The distance of the surface from the origin is proportional to the value for given angles, while the color denotes the sign (blue for positive, yellow for negative).
Multipole density formalism: Electron density isosurface map around a covalent bond modelled with the Multipole Model, with populational parameters taken from the ELMAM2 database. Note the elongated high-density area next to the hydrogen atom, pointing in the direction of oxygen.
Electron density isosurface map around a covalent bond modelled with the Multipole Model, with populational parameters taken from the ELMAM2 database. Note the elongated high-density area next to the hydrogen atom, pointing in the direction of oxygen.
Multipole density formalism: Electron density isosurface map around a covalent bond modelled with the Independent Atom Model in the same scale. Nucleus-centred functions impose lower charge density on the bond path.
Electron density isosurface map around a covalent bond modelled with the Independent Atom Model in the same scale. Nucleus-centred functions impose lower charge density on the bond path.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Multipole density formalism

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Multipole density formalism claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In chemistry, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Multipole density formalism before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Multipole density formalism ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Multipole density formalism

In research
Multipole density formalism appears in chemistry research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Multipole density formalism in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Multipole density formalism is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Crystallography, Diffraction, Theoretical chemistry, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Multipole density formalism outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Multipole density formalism in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Multipole density formalism means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Multipole density formalism out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Multipole density formalism in simple terms?

The Multipole Density Formalism (also referred to as Hansen-Coppens Formalism) is an X-ray crystallography method of electron density modelling proposed by Niels K. Hansen and Philip Coppens in 1978.

Why does Multipole density formalism matter?

Because it connects several chemistry ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Multipole density formalism?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Multipole density formalism.

Tags

  • Crystallography
  • Diffraction
  • Theoretical chemistry
  • X-ray crystallography

Keep exploring