ArticleslgStudy

science

Murder of Clarence Hiller

Murder of Clarence Hiller is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Murder of Clarence Hiller rather than just read about it. In short: Clarence Hiller (? – 19 September 1910) was the chief clerk in the freight department of the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad. He was murdered in Chicago, Illinois on September 19, 1910.

Key takeaways

  • Murder of Clarence Hiller belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Murder of Clarence Hiller to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Murder of Clarence Hiller from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Clarence Hiller (? – 19 September 1910) was the chief clerk in the freight department of the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad. He was murdered in Chicago, Illinois on September 19, 1910. Fingerprint evidence was used to convict Thomas Jennings, marking the first time fingerprint evidence was used for a conviction in the United States. The court case that followed, People v. Jennings, cemented fingerprint evidence as legally valid in the United States.

Background In Chicago, Illinois, on September 19, 1910, Thomas Jennings entered the home of Clarence Hiller, with the intent of burgling the house. One of their daughters, Florence, was awakened by someone on her bed. Initially assuming that the person was her younger brother, she tried to scream after hearing Jennings' voice and realizing it was someone else. Jennings pushed up Florence's nightgown and felt her bare body, possibly intending to sexually assault her. Mary was woken by the noise and woke her husband, who then confronted Jennings. A struggle between Hiller and Jennings ensued, and Hiller was shot dead by Jennings. Jennings left through the front door, and touched a freshly painted railing, leaving four fingerprints. About a mile from the site of the murder, police officers detained Jennings, who was walking with a limp, had a torn, bloodstained coat and had a recently fired revolver. When questioned about his injuries, he claimed that he fell off a trolley. He was placed under arrest and brought to the police station.

Investigation Police discovered the fingerprint while searching the house, and they photographed the prints and removed the railing, tagging both as evidence. Mary Hiller, Clarence Hiller's wife, failed to pick Jennings out of a police lineup. Jennings was interrogated, and he did not confess.

Trial At Jennings' murder trial, the prosecuting attorney showed the judge and jury the fingerprints left on the railing, which they claimed were Jennings' fingerprints. The defense tried to have the evidence thrown out, claiming that fingerprinting was a flawed system and had not been scientifically proven. In an attempt to prove that fingerprint evidence was not reliable, the defense asked the prosecution to collect a fingerprint that proved the defense lawyer had touched a specific piece of paper. This backfired when the prosecution was able to lift a very clear print from the paper, and was able to identify it as the lawyer's. Fingerprint analysis in detective work was a fairly new field, but specialists were brought in who had experience with fingerprints. The four expert witnesses were two Chicago police officers with experience in fingerprints, an inspector from the Dominion Police in Ottawa, Canada, and a U.S. government investigator who was trained at Scotland Yard, which was the first law enforcement organization to use fingerprint analysis in detective work. All of the expert witnesses agreed that the fingerprints left on the railing were Jennings'. Jennings was found unanimously guilty by the jury of murder and was sentenced to death.

Appeal Jennings appealed the case to the Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Jennings, 252 Ill. 534 (1911). One of the reasons for the appeal was that fingerprint evidence had never been used as evidence in the US before. Chief Justice Orrin Carter wrote an opinion stating there was no "case in which this question has been raised” and “we find no statutes or decisions touching the point in this country." He cited scientific findings in his opinion that proved that fingerprint evidence was reliable in a court of law and added that Great Britain had already decided that fingerprint evidence was valid. Orrin wrote "there is a scientific basis for the system of finger-print identification and that the courts are justified in admitting this class of evidence." Carter concluded "no one of these circumstances, considered alone, would be conclusive of his guilt, but when all of the facts introduced as evidence are considered together, the jury were justified" in finding Jennings guilty. The ruling stated, “this method of identification [fingerprinting] is in such general and common use that the courts cannot refuse to take judicial cognizance of it.” Jennings sentence was upheld and he was hanged at the Cook County Jail on February 16, 1912.

References

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Murder of Clarence Hiller

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Murder of Clarence Hiller claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Murder of Clarence Hiller before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Murder of Clarence Hiller ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Murder of Clarence Hiller

In research
Murder of Clarence Hiller appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Murder of Clarence Hiller in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Murder of Clarence Hiller is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1910 murders in the United States, Capital murder cases, Deaths by firearm in Illinois, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Murder of Clarence Hiller outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Murder of Clarence Hiller” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Murder of Clarence Hiller in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Murder of Clarence Hiller means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Murder of Clarence Hiller out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Murder of Clarence Hiller in simple terms?

Clarence Hiller (? – 19 September 1910) was the chief clerk in the freight department of the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad. He was murdered in Chicago, Illinois on September 19, 1910.

Why does Murder of Clarence Hiller matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Murder of Clarence Hiller?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Murder of Clarence Hiller.

Tags

  • 1910 murders in the United States
  • Capital murder cases
  • Deaths by firearm in Illinois
  • Fingerprints
  • People murdered in Chicago

Keep exploring