ArticleslgStudy

science

Naismith's rule

Naismith's rule is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Naismith's rule rather than just read about it. In short: Naismith's rule helps with the planning of a walking or hiking expedition by calculating how long it will take to travel the intended route, including any extra time taken when walking uphill. This rule of thumb was devised by William W.

Naismith's rule — main illustration
Naismith's rule — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Naismith's rule belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Naismith's rule to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Naismith's rule from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Naismith's rule helps with the planning of a walking or hiking expedition by calculating how long it will take to travel the intended route, including any extra time taken when walking uphill. This rule of thumb was devised by William W. Naismith, a Scottish mountaineer, in 1892 whilst walking Cruach Ardrain. A modern version can be formulated as follows:

Allow one hour for every 3 miles (5 km) forward, plus an additional hour for every 2,000 feet (600 m) of ascent.

Assumptions and calculations

The original Naismith's rule from 1892 says that one should allow one hour per three miles on the map and an additional hour per 2000 feet of ascent. It is included in the last sentence of his report from a trip. Today it is formulated in many ways. Naismith's 1 h / 3 mi + 1 h / 2000 ft can be replaced by:

1 h / 3 mi (5 km) + 1 h / 2000 ft (600 m) 1 h / 5 km (3 mi) + 1/2 h / 300 m (1000 ft) 3 mph + ½ h / 1000 ft5 km/h + ½ h / 300 m 12 min / 1 km + 10 min / 100 m The basic rule assumes hikers of reasonable fitness, on typical terrain, and under normal conditions. It does not account for delays, such as extended breaks for rest or sightseeing, or for navigational obstacles. For planning expeditions a team leader may use Naismith's rule in putting together a route card. It is possible to apply adjustments or "corrections" for more challenging terrain, although it cannot be used for scrambling routes. In the grading system used in North America, Naismith's rule applies only to hikes rated Class 1 on the Yosemite Decimal System, and not to Class 2 or higher. In practice, the results of Naismith's rule are usually considered the minimum time necessary to complete a route, though modern adaptations and hiking time calculators account for terrain difficulty, elevation gain, and individual fitness levels. When walking in groups, Naismith’s rule is generally applied based on the pace of the slowest member to ensure the group remains together. This adjustment accounts for variations in fitness, terrain difficulty, and rest needs among participants. Naismith's rule appears in UK statute law, although not by name. The Adventure Activities Licensing Regulations apply to providers of various activities including trekking. Part of the definition of trekking is that it is over terrain on which it would take more than 30 minutes to reach a road or refuge (by the quickest safe route), based on a walking speed of 5 kilometres per hour plus an additional minute for every 10 metres of ascent.

Scarf's equivalence between distance and climb Alternatively, the rule can be used to determine the equivalent flat distance of a route. This is achieved by recognising that Naismith's rule implies an equivalence between distance and climb in time terms: 3 miles (=15,840 feet) of distance is equivalent in time terms to 2000 feet of climb. Professor Philip Scarf, Associate Dean of Research and Innovation and Professor of Applied Statistics at the University of Salford, in research published in 2008, gives the following formula:

equivalent distance = x + α·y where:

x = horizontal distance y = vertical distance α = 7.92 (3 mi / 2000 ft), called Naismith’s number by Scarf That is, 7.92 units of distance are equivalent to 1 unit of climb. For convenience an 8 to 1 rule can be used. So, for example, if a route is 20 kilometres (12 mi) with 1600 metres of climb (as is the case on leg 1 of the Bob Graham Round, Keswick to Threlkeld), the equivalent flat distance of this route is 20+(1.6×8)=32.8 kilometres (20.4 mi). Assuming an individual can maintain a speed on the flat of 5 km/h, the route will take 6 hours and 34 minutes. The simplicity of this approach is that the time taken can be easily adjusted for an individual's own (chosen) speed on the flat; at 8 km/h (flat speed) the route will take 4 hours and 6 minutes. The rule has been tested on fell running times and found to be reliable. Scarf proposed this equivalence in 1998. As you can see the forward, the Scarf's assumption allows also to calculate the time for each speed, not just one as in case of the original Naismith rule.

Pace Pace is the reciprocal of speed. It can be calculated here from the following formula:

p = p0·(1 + α·m) where:

p = pace p0 = pace on flat terrain m = gradient uphill This formula is true for m≥0 (uphill or flat terrain). It assumes equivalence of distance and climb by applying mentioned earlier α factor. Sample calculations: p0 = 12 min / km (for 5 km / h speed), m = 0.6 km climb / 5 km distance = 0.12, p = 12 · (1 + 7.92 · 0.12) = 23.4 min / km.

Other modifications Over the years several adjustments have been formulated in an attempt to make the rule more accurate by accounting for further variables such as load carried, roughness of terrain, descents and fitness (or lack of it). The accuracy of some corrections is disputed, in particular the speed at which walkers descend a gentle gradient. No simple formula can encompass the full diversity of mountain conditions and individual abilities.

Tranter's corrections

Tranter's corrections make adjustments for fitness and fatigue. Fitness is determined by the time it takes to climb 1000 feet over a distance of ½ mile (800 m). Additional adjustments for uneven or unstable terrain or conditions can be estimated by dropping one or more fitness levels.

For example, if Naismith's rule estimates a journey time of 9 hours and your fitness level is 25, you should allow 11.5 hours.

Aitken corrections Aitken (1977) assumes that 1 h takes to cover 3 mi (5 km) on paths, tracks and roads, while this is reduced to 2½ mi (4 km) on all other surfaces. For both distances he gives an additional 1 h per 2000 ft (600 m) of ascent. So Aitken doesn't take into account equivalence between distance and climb (proposed by Scarf in 1998).

Langmuir corrections Langmuir (1984) extends the rule on descent. He assumes the Naismith's base speed of 5 km/h and makes the following further refinements for going downhill:

For a gentle decline (slopes between 5 degrees and 12 degrees) subtract 10 minutes for every 300 meters of descent For a steep decline (slopes greater than 12 degrees) add 10 minutes for every 300 meters of descent Later he says that the fitness of the slowest member of a party should be taken into account and thus a more practical formula for a group is:

4 km/h + 1 h / 450 m of ascent

See also Preferred walking speed Tobler's hiking function

Notes

References

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Naismith's rule: Naismith's rule[1][2]
Naismith's rule[1][2]
Naismith's rule: Pace[6] in minutes per kilometre or mile vs. slope angle resulting from Naismith's rule[7] for basal speeds of5 km/h and 4 km/h.[n 1]
Pace[6] in minutes per kilometre or mile vs. slope angle resulting from Naismith's rule[7] for basal speeds of5 km/h and 4 km/h.[n 1]
Naismith's rule: A plot of walking speed versus slope resulting from Naismith's rule[7] and Langmuir corrections[7][16] for base speeds of 5 km/h and 4 km/h compared to Tobler's hiking function.[17][n 1]
A plot of walking speed versus slope resulting from Naismith's rule[7] and Langmuir corrections[7][16] for base speeds of 5 km/h and 4 km/h compared to Tobler's hiking function.[17][n 1]

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Naismith's rule

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Naismith's rule claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Naismith's rule before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Naismith's rule ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Naismith's rule

In research
Naismith's rule appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Naismith's rule in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Naismith's rule is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1892 introductions, Hiking, Navigation, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Naismith's rule outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Naismith's rule” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Naismith's rule in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Naismith's rule means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Naismith's rule out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Naismith's rule in simple terms?

Naismith's rule helps with the planning of a walking or hiking expedition by calculating how long it will take to travel the intended route, including any extra time taken when walking uphill. This rule of thumb was devised by William W.

Why does Naismith's rule matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Naismith's rule?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Naismith's rule.

Tags

  • 1892 introductions
  • Hiking
  • Navigation
  • Rules of thumb

Keep exploring