ArticleslgStudy

science

Oklahoma City sonic boom tests

Oklahoma City sonic boom tests is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Oklahoma City sonic boom tests rather than just read about it. In short: The Oklahoma City sonic boom tests, also known as Operation Bongo II, refer to a controversial experiment, organized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in which 1,253 sonic booms were generated over Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, over a period of six months starting in February 1964. The experiment was intended to quantify the effects of transcontinental supersonic transport (SST) aircraft on a city, to measure…

Oklahoma City sonic boom tests — main illustration
Oklahoma City sonic boom tests — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Oklahoma City sonic boom tests belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Oklahoma City sonic boom tests to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Oklahoma City sonic boom tests from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Oklahoma City sonic boom tests, also known as Operation Bongo II, refer to a controversial experiment, organized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in which 1,253 sonic booms were generated over Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, over a period of six months starting in February 1964. The experiment was intended to quantify the effects of transcontinental supersonic transport (SST) aircraft on a city, to measure the booms' effect on structures and public attitude, and to develop standards for boom prediction and insurance data. Oklahoma City's population was perceived to be relatively tolerant of such an experiment, as it had an economic dependency on the nearby Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center and Tinker Air Force Base; and, in fact, the local Chamber of Commerce threw a celebratory dinner when Oklahoma was selected. Despite this the testing was stopped early, in the wake of damage complaints, and although the final report said that "the overwhelming majority felt they could learn to live with the numbers and kinds of booms experienced", the FAA's poor handling of complaints led to a class action lawsuit against the U.S. government. The negative publicity associated with the tests partially influenced the 1971 cancellation of the Boeing 2707 project and the severe restriction of commercial supersonic flight in the United States.

Testing Starting on February 3, 1964, the first sonic booms began, eight booms per day that began at 7 a.m. and ended in the afternoon. The Air Force used F-104 fighter and B-58 bomber aircraft to produce the booms, along with the occasional F-101 and F-106. The noise was limited to 1.0 to 1.5 pound-force per square foot (48 to 72 pascal) for the first twelve weeks, then increased to 1.5 to 2.0 psf (72 to 96 pascal) for the final fourteen weeks. This range was about equal to that expected from an SST. Though eight booms per day were harsh, the peak overpressures of 2.0 psf were supposedly an order of magnitude lower than that needed to shatter glass, and are considered marginally irritating according to published standards. Oklahomans initially took the tests in stride. This was chalked up to the booms being predictable and coming at specific times. An FAA-hired camera crew, filming a group of construction workers, were surprised to find that the booms signaled their lunch break. However, in the first 14 weeks, 147 windows in the city's two tallest buildings, the First National Bank and Liberty National Bank, were broken. By late spring, organized civic groups were already springing into action, but were rebuffed by city politicians, who asked them to show legislators their support. An attempt to lodge an injunction against the tests was denied by district court Judge Stephen Chandler, who said that the plaintiffs could not establish that they suffered any mental or physical harm and that the tests were a vital national need. A restraining order was then sought, which brought a pause to the tests on May 13 until it was decided that the court had exceeded its authority. Pressure mounted from within. The federal Bureau of the Budget lambasted the FAA about poor experiment design, while complaints flooded into U.S. Senator Mike Monroney's office. Finally, East Coast newspapers began to pick up the issue, turning on the national spotlight. On June 6 the Saturday Review published an article titled The Era of Supersonic Morality, which criticized the manner in which the FAA had targeted a city without consulting local government. By July, The Washington Post reported on the turmoil at the local and state level in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City Council members were finally beginning to respond to citizen complaints and put pressure on Washington. The pressure put a premature end to the tests. On July 30, the tests were over. An Oklahoma City Times headline reported: "Silence is deafening!" Zhivko D. Angeluscheff, a prominent hearing specialist serving with the National Academy of Sciences, recalled: "I was witness to the fact that men were executing their brethren during six long months ... with their thunder, the sonic boom, they were punishing all living creatures on earth."

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Oklahoma City sonic boom tests: Aerial view of Oklahoma City (1974 photograph)
Aerial view of Oklahoma City (1974 photograph)
Oklahoma City sonic boom tests: A Convair B-58 Hustler, one of the airplane models used in the Oklahoma City sonic boom tests
A Convair B-58 Hustler, one of the airplane models used in the Oklahoma City sonic boom tests

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Oklahoma City sonic boom tests

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Oklahoma City sonic boom tests claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Oklahoma City sonic boom tests before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Oklahoma City sonic boom tests ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Oklahoma City sonic boom tests

In research
Oklahoma City sonic boom tests appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Oklahoma City sonic boom tests in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Oklahoma City sonic boom tests is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1964 in Oklahoma, 1964 in the United States, 20th-century aviation, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Oklahoma City sonic boom tests outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Oklahoma City sonic boom tests” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Oklahoma City sonic boom tests in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Oklahoma City sonic boom tests means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Oklahoma City sonic boom tests out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Oklahoma City sonic boom tests in simple terms?

The Oklahoma City sonic boom tests, also known as Operation Bongo II, refer to a controversial experiment, organized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in which 1,253 sonic booms were generated over Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, over a period of six months starting in February 1964. The exper…

Why does Oklahoma City sonic boom tests matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Oklahoma City sonic boom tests?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Oklahoma City sonic boom tests.

Tags

  • 1964 in Oklahoma
  • 1964 in the United States
  • 20th-century aviation
  • Aviation history of the United States
  • Human subject research in the United States
  • Psychology experiments

Keep exploring