ArticleslgStudy

science

Ophidiophobia

Ophidiophobia is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Ophidiophobia rather than just read about it. In short: Ophidiophobia () or ophiophobia () is fear of snakes. It is sometimes called by the more general term herpetophobia, fear of reptiles.

Ophidiophobia — main illustration
Ophidiophobia — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Ophidiophobia belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Ophidiophobia to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Ophidiophobia from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Ophidiophobia () or ophiophobia () is fear of snakes. It is sometimes called by the more general term herpetophobia, fear of reptiles. The word comes from the Ancient Greek: ὄφις, romanized: óphis, lit. 'snake', and φοβία, phobía, 'fear'.

Research

About one-third of adult humans have a fear of snakes, making it one of the most commonly reported phobias. However, adults manifesting "clinically relevant" ophidiophobia accounts for only about 3–4% of the population. In The Handbook of the Emotions (1993), psychologist Arne Öhman studied pairing an unconditioned stimulus with evolutionarily-relevant fear-response neutral stimuli (snakes and spiders) versus evolutionarily-irrelevant fear-response neutral stimuli (mushrooms, flowers, physical representation of polyhedra, firearms, and electrical outlets) on human subjects and found that ophidiophobia and arachnophobia required only one pairing to develop a conditioned response while mycophobia, anthophobia, phobias of physical representations of polyhedra, firearms, and electrical outlets required multiple pairings and went extinct without continued conditioning while the conditioned ophidiophobia and arachnophobia were permanent. Similarly, psychologists Susan Mineka, Richard Keir, and Veda Price found that laboratory-raised rhesus macaques did not display fear if required to reach across a toy snake to receive a banana unless the macaque was shown a video of another macaque withdrawing in fright from the toy (which produced a permanent fear-response), while being shown a similar video of another macaque displaying fear of a flower produced no similar response. Psychologist Paul Ekman cites this anecdote by Charles Darwin in The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1872) in connection with Öhman's research:

I put my face close to the thick glass-plate in front of a puff-adder in the Zoological Gardens, with the firm determination of not starting back if the snake struck at me; but, as soon as the blow was struck, my resolution went for nothing, and I jumped a yard or two backwards with astonishing rapidity. My will and reason were powerless against the imagination of a danger which had never been experienced. Psychiatrist Randolph M. Nesse notes that while conditioned fear responses to evolutionarily novel dangers such as electrical outlets is possible, the conditioning is slower because such cues have no prewired connection to fear, and that despite the emphasis on the risks of speeding and drunk driving in driver's education, it does not provide reliable protection against traffic collisions and that nearly one-quarter of all deaths in 2014 of people aged 15 to 24 in the United States were in traffic collisions. Also, Nesse, psychiatrist Isaac Marks, and evolutionary biologist George C. Williams wrote that people with systematically deficient responses to adaptive phobias (e.g. ophidiophobia, arachnophobia, basophobia) are more temperamentally careless and more likely to receive unintentional injuries that are potentially fatal and have proposed that such deficient phobia should be classified as "hypophobia" due to its selfish genetic consequences. Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins argued that simulation and imagination would be favored by natural selection over trial-and-error learning across species due to the selfish genetic consequences, while anthropologist Christopher Boehm argued vicarious cultural learning would be favored over trial-and-error learning in noting how Kalahari Bushmen parents teach their children about likely locations of venomous snakes. Likewise, cognitive scientist Steven Pinker has noted that wariness around snakes, folk biology, folk taxonomies, and abstraction in speech and thought are all cultural universals. A 2001 study at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden suggested that mammals may have an innate negative reaction to snakes (and spiders), which was vital for their survival as it allowed such threats to be identified immediately. A 2009 report of a 40-year research program demonstrated strong fear conditioning to snakes in humans and fast nonconscious processing of snake images; these are mediated by a fear network in the human brain involving the amygdala. A 2013 study provided neurobiological evidence in primates (macaques) of natural selection for detecting snakes rapidly.

In fiction In non-medical press and literature, the movie-character Indiana Jones has been used as an example of someone with ophidiophobia.

References

Illustrations

Ophidiophobia: The Punishment of Loki by J. Doyle Penrose
The Punishment of Loki by J. Doyle Penrose

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Ophidiophobia

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Ophidiophobia claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Ophidiophobia before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Ophidiophobia ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Ophidiophobia

In research
Ophidiophobia appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Ophidiophobia in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Ophidiophobia is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Snakes, Zoophobias, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Ophidiophobia outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Ophidiophobia in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Ophidiophobia means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Ophidiophobia out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Ophidiophobia in simple terms?

Ophidiophobia () or ophiophobia () is fear of snakes. It is sometimes called by the more general term herpetophobia, fear of reptiles.

Why does Ophidiophobia matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Ophidiophobia?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Ophidiophobia.

Tags

  • Snakes
  • Zoophobias

Keep exploring