Organizational storytelling (also known as business storytelling) is a concept in management and organization studies concerned with the role of narrative and story in organizational life. It examines how stories are created, circulated, and used within organizations to communicate values, manage meaning, transmit knowledge, negotiate identity, exercise power, and make sense of events. The field draws on communication theory, sociology, literary theory, and organization studies.
History and development Interest in stories and narratives as organizational phenomena emerged from the organizational culture research of the 1980s. Early studies examined how organizational stories conveyed culture, norms, and values to members.Martin, Joanne; Feldman, Martha; Hatch, Mary Jo; Sitkin, Sim B. (1983). "The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories". Administrative Science Quarterly. 28 (3): 438–453. doi:10.2307/2392251. Boje (1991) published a foundational empirical study of storytelling performance in an office supply firm in the Administrative Science Quarterly, documenting how employees collaboratively produce abbreviated, allusive story fragments rather than polished narratives — a "terse style" of organizational storytelling shaped by shared context.Boje, David M. (1991). "The storytelling organization: A study of storytelling performance in an office supply firm". Administrative Science Quarterly. 36 (1): 106–126. doi:10.2307/2393432. Karl Weick's work on sensemaking contributed to the theoretical development of organizational storytelling, establishing the central role of narrative in how organizations retrospectively make sense of events.Weick, Karl E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Barbara Czarniawska applied narrative theory and dramatism to the study of organizational identity, examining how institutions narrate themselves into existence.Czarniawska, Barbara (1997). Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity. University of Chicago Press. Yiannis Gabriel developed a psychoanalytically informed approach to organizational stories, distinguishing between managed information and unmanaged stories as sites of fantasy, desire, and resistance.Gabriel, Yiannis (2000). Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions, and Fantasies. London: Oxford University Press. In the 2000s the field expanded in multiple directions. Practitioner-oriented work focused on leadership communication and knowledge management, examining how storytelling could be deployed strategically in organizations.Denning, Steve (2005). The Leader's Guide to Storytelling: Mastering the Art and Discipline of Business Narrative. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Academic research explored storytelling in relation to organizational change, organizational identity, discourse analysis, cross-cultural management, and critical management studies.Vaara, Eero; Sonenshein, Scott; Boje, David (2016). "Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations: Approaches and directions for future research". Academy of Management Annals. 10 (1): 495–560. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1120963.
Theoretical perspectives Giroux and Marroquin (2005) identified five perspectives in the academic literature on organizational storytelling:Giroux, Nicole; Marroquin, Lissette (2005). "L'approche narrative des organisations". Revue française de gestion. 31 (159): 15–42. ISSN 0338-4551.
Functionalist perspective The functionalist perspective treats storytelling as a management tool for top-down communication. It focuses on the efficiency of narrative transmission, emphasizing brevity and consistency with organizational objectives. Stories in this perspective serve to align employee behavior with strategic goals.Giroux, Nicole; Marroquin, Lissette (2005). "L'approche narrative des organisations". Revue française de gestion. 31 (159): 15–42. Strategic ambiguity — deliberate vagueness in communication — is recognized as a sometimes intentional feature rather than a failure of transmission.Eisenberg, Eric M. (1984). "Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication". Communication Monographs. 51 (3): 227–242. doi:10.1080/03637758409390197.
Interpretive perspective The interpretive perspective treats the organization as a socially constructed, subjective universe accessible to researchers through the stories actors tell. Narratives carry both the central values of an organization and the contradictions, conflicts, and differences that official accounts suppress. Barbara Czarniawska's institutional narrative approach combines insights from anthropology, literary theory, and institutionalism to examine how organizations produce and circulate stories about themselves.Czarniawska, Barbara (1997). Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity. University of Chicago Press. Antenarrative theory, developed by Boje (2001), extends the interpretive perspective by attending to the fragmented, pre-narrative stories — the "living stories" — that circulate before they congeal into institutionally endorsed narrative accounts.Boje, David M. (2001). Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research. London: Sage.
Process perspective The process perspective, drawing on the work of Karl Weick, treats the organization not as a fixed entity but as an ongoing organizing process. Storytelling is central to this process because narrative is the primary means by which actors engage in sensemaking — making retrospective sense of equivocal events. Researchers in this tradition study stories in situations of organizational change, controversy, or crisis, and examine the "narrative intelligence" of organizational actors.Giroux, Nicole; Marroquin, Lissette (2005). "L'approche narrative des organisations". Revue française de gestion. 31 (159): 15–42. Sensemaking processes are understood as inherently retrospective: actors construct plausible accounts of what has happened rather than discovering pre-existing facts.Weick, Karl E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage.
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
