In mathematics, a Paley–Wiener theorem is a theorem that relates decay properties of a function or distribution at infinity with analyticity of its Fourier transform. It is named after Raymond Paley (1907–1933) and Norbert Wiener (1894–1964) who, in 1934, introduced various versions of the theorem. The original theorems did not use the language of distributions, and instead applied to square-integrable functions. The first such theorem using distributions was due to Laurent Schwartz. These theorems heavily rely on the triangle inequality (to interchange the absolute value and integration). The original work by Paley and Wiener is also used as a namesake in the fields of control theory and harmonic analysis; introducing the Paley–Wiener condition for spectral factorization and the Paley–Wiener criterion for non-harmonic Fourier series respectively. These are related mathematical concepts that place the decay properties of a function in context of stability problems.
Holomorphic Fourier transforms The classical Paley–Wiener theorems make use of the holomorphic Fourier transform on classes of square-integrable functions supported on the real line. Formally, the idea is to take the integral defining the (inverse) Fourier transform
f ( ζ ) = ∫ − ∞ ∞ F ( x ) e i x ζ d x {\displaystyle f(\zeta )=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }F(x)e^{ix\zeta }\,dx}
and allow ζ {\displaystyle \zeta } to be a complex number in the upper half-plane. One may then expect to differentiate under the integral in order to verify that the Cauchy–Riemann equations hold, and thus that f {\displaystyle f} defines an analytic function. However, this integral may not be well-defined, even for F {\displaystyle F} in L 2 ( R ) {\displaystyle L^{2}(\mathbb {R} )} ; indeed, since ζ {\displaystyle \zeta } is in the upper half plane, the modulus of e i x ζ {\displaystyle e^{ix\zeta }} grows exponentially as x → − ∞ {\displaystyle x\to -\infty } ; so differentiation under the integral sign is out of the question. One must impose further restrictions on F {\displaystyle F} in order to ensure that this integral is well-defined. The first such restriction is that F {\displaystyle F} be supported on R + {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} _{+}} : that is, F ∈ L 2 ( R + ) {\displaystyle F\in L^{2}(\mathbb {R} _{+})} . The Paley–Wiener theorem now asserts the following: The holomorphic Fourier transform of F {\displaystyle F} , defined by
f ( ζ ) = ∫ 0 ∞ F ( x ) e i x ζ d x {\displaystyle f(\zeta )=\int _{0}^{\infty }F(x)e^{ix\zeta }\,dx}
for ζ {\displaystyle \zeta } in the upper half-plane is a holomorphic function. Moreover, by Plancherel's theorem, one has
∫ − ∞ ∞ | f ( ξ + i η ) | 2 d ξ ≤ ∫ 0 ∞ | F ( x ) | 2 d x {\displaystyle \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|f(\xi +i\eta )\right|^{2}\,d\xi \leq \int _{0}^{\infty }|F(x)|^{2}\,dx}
and by dominated convergence,
lim η → 0 + ∫ − ∞ ∞ | f ( ξ + i η ) − f ( ξ ) | 2 d ξ = 0. {\displaystyle \lim _{\eta \to 0^{+}}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|f(\xi +i\eta )-f(\xi )\right|^{2}\,d\xi =0.}
Conversely, if f {\displaystyle f} is a holomorphic function in the upper half-plane satisfying
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
