ArticleslgStudy

science

Parallelism (rhetoric)

Parallelism (rhetoric) is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Parallelism (rhetoric) rather than just read about it. In short: Parallelism (or thought rhyme) is a rhetorical device that compounds words or phrases that have equivalent meanings so as to create a definite pattern. This structure is particularly effective when "specifying or enumerating pairs or series of like things".

Key takeaways

  • Parallelism (rhetoric) belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Parallelism (rhetoric) to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Parallelism (rhetoric) from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Parallelism (or thought rhyme) is a rhetorical device that compounds words or phrases that have equivalent meanings so as to create a definite pattern. This structure is particularly effective when "specifying or enumerating pairs or series of like things". A scheme of balance, parallelism represents "one of the basic principles of grammar and rhetoric". Parallelism as a rhetorical device is used in many languages and cultures around the world in poetry, epics, songs, written prose and speech, from the folk level to the professional. An entire issue of the journal Oral Tradition has been devoted to articles on parallelism in languages from all over. It is very often found in Biblical poetry and in proverbs in general.

Examples The following sentences and verses possess "similarity in structure" in words and phrases:

She tried to make the law clear, precise and equitable. In the quote above, the compounded adjectives serve as parallel elements and support the noun "law".

Her purpose was to impress the ignorant, to perplex the dubious, and to confound the scrupulous. In the above quote, three infinitive verb phrases produce the parallel structure supporting the noun "purpose". Note that this rhetorical device requires that the coordinate elements agree with one another grammatically: "nouns with nouns, infinitive verb phrases with infinitive verb phrases and adverb clauses with adverb clauses." When the coordinate elements possess the same number of words (or in the example below, the same number of syllables) the scheme is termed isocolon:

I'll give my jewels for a set of beads,My gorgeous palace for a hermitage,My gay apparel for an almsman's gownMy figured goblets for a dish of wood. – Shakespeare, Richard II Synonymous parallelism in which one couplet expresses similar concepts can also be combined with antithetical parallelism in which a second couplet contrasts with the first. For example, synonymous and antithetical parallelism occur in Revelation 22:11:

A Let the evildoer still do evil, A' and the filthy still be filthy, B and the righteous still do right. B' and the holy still be holy.

Forms Parallelisms of various sorts are the chief rhetorical device of Biblical poetry in the tristich and in multiples of distich parallels and also in the poetry of many other cultures around the world, particularly in their oral traditions. Robert Lowth coined the term parallelismus membrorum (parallelism of members, i.e. poetic lines) in his 1788 book, Lectures on the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrew Nation. Roman Jakobson pioneered the secular study of parallelism in poetic-linguistic traditions around the world, including his own Russian tradition. Chinese and Vietnamese classical poetry and prose have frequently made use of parallelism. Conversations between learned men in many cases involved exchanging single parallel couplets as a form of playing with words, as well as a kind of mental duel. In a parallel couplet, not only must the content, the parts of speech, the mythological and historico-geographical allusions, be all separately matched and balanced, but most of the tones must also be paired reciprocally. Even tones are conjoined with inflected ones, and vice versa. Parallelisms in artistic speech are common in some languages of Mesoamerica, such as Nahuatl (Aztec) and some Mayan languages. It has also been observed in a language of Indonesia (that Fox imprecisely referred to as "Rotinese") and Navajo. Other research has found parallelisms in the languages of the Ural-Altaic area (including Finnish-Karelian folk poetry and the epics and songs of the Turkic and Mongolian peoples) and Toda, suggesting wider distribution among Dravidian languages. In the Limba language community of Sierra Leone and Guinea, some prayers are formed with parallelisms.

Proverbs Parallelisms in proverbs are very common in languages around the world. Parallel structures in short passages such as proverbs help direct the listener or reader to compare the parallel elements and thus more easily deduce the point.

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. (English proverb) Wounds caused by knives will heal, wounds caused by words will not heal. (Tamil proverb) The truth has legs and ran away; the lie has no legs and must stay. (Yiddish proverb) When there is food in the house, what matter if a guest arrives? When there is faith, what is death? (Pashto proverb) The cow which leaves first will be broken at the horn; the cow which remains in the back will be broken at the tail. (Alaaba proverb from Ethiopia)

Riddles In many cultures, riddles are a form of wisdom literature, similar to proverbs. Many riddles are formed with parallelisms. Yoruba:

“Elephant dies, and this one eats him; buffalo dies, and this one eats him; this one dies, there is no one who eats him.” Answer: fire Tamil:

“If you chase him off, he comes again; but if you stroke him, he dies.” Answer: mosquito. Gidole language:

"When I am going I am hungry. When I return I am full."

See also Anaphora Antithetic parallelism Ars longa, vita brevis Chiasmus Exergasia Horror aequi Syntactic parallelism

Footnotes

Sources Baldrick, Chris. 2008. Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford University Press. New York. ISBN 978-0-19-920827-2 Corbett, Edward P. J. and Connors, Robert J. 1999. Style and Statement. Oxford University Press. New York, Oxford. ISBN 0-19-511543-0 Forsyth, Mark. 2014. The Elements of Eloquence. Berkley Publishing Group/Penguin Publishing. New York. ISBN 978-0-425-27618-1 Special issue of the journal Oral Tradition from 2017, Volume 31, Issue 2: "Parallelism in Verbal Art and Performance". Grosser, Emmylou J. 2021. What symmetry can do that parallelism can’t: Line perception and poetic effects in the song of Deborah (Judges 5:2–31). Vetus Testamentum 71(2):175–204. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341455.

External links Parallelism lists types of parallelism.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Parallelism (rhetoric)

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Parallelism (rhetoric) claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Parallelism (rhetoric) before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Parallelism (rhetoric) ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Parallelism (rhetoric)

In research
Parallelism (rhetoric) appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Parallelism (rhetoric) in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Parallelism (rhetoric) is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Grammar, Rhetoric, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Parallelism (rhetoric) outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Parallelism (rhetoric)” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Parallelism (rhetoric) in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Parallelism (rhetoric) means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Parallelism (rhetoric) out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Parallelism (rhetoric) in simple terms?

Parallelism (or thought rhyme) is a rhetorical device that compounds words or phrases that have equivalent meanings so as to create a definite pattern. This structure is particularly effective when "specifying or enumerating pairs or series of like things".

Why does Parallelism (rhetoric) matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Parallelism (rhetoric)?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Parallelism (rhetoric).

Tags

  • Grammar
  • Rhetoric

Keep exploring