ArticleslgStudy

science

Philosophy of language

Philosophy of language is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Philosophy of language rather than just read about it. In short: Philosophy of language is the study of the nature of language. It investigates the relationship between language, language users, and the world.

Philosophy of language — main illustration
Philosophy of language — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Philosophy of language belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Philosophy of language to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Philosophy of language from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Philosophy of language is the study of the nature of language. It investigates the relationship between language, language users, and the world. Investigations may include inquiry into the nature of meaning, indexicality, intentionality, reference, the constitution of sentences, concepts, learning, and thought. Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell were pivotal figures in analytic philosophy's "linguistic turn". These writers were followed by Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus), the Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and Willard Van Orman Quine.

History

Ancient philosophy In the West, inquiry into language stretches back to the 5th century BC with philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics. Linguistic speculation predated systematic descriptions of grammar which emerged c. the 5th century BC in India and c. the 3rd century BC in Greece. In the dialogue Cratylus, Plato considers the question of whether the names of things are determined by convention or by nature. He criticizes conventionalism as leading to the bizarre consequence that, as anything can be conventionally denominated by any name, there can hence be neither fitting, or correct, names, nor unfitting or incorrect ones—yet it seems, intuitively, that such "incorrect" names are indeed possible: e.g., if Theophilus means "god-beloved", it seems inappropriate for anyone who is not, in fact, very pious at all. Plato argues, further, that primitive (as opposed to derived) names have a natural correctness, because each phoneme represents basic ideas or sentiments; for example, the letter λ and its sound represent—for Plato—the idea of smoothness or softness. However, by the end of Cratylus, he seems to admit that some social conventions are also involved, and that the idea that phonemes have individual meanings is not without flaw. Plato is often considered a proponent of extreme realism. Aristotle interested himself with issues of logic, categories, and the creation of meaning. He separated all things into categories of species and genus. He thought that the meaning of a predicate was established through an abstraction of the similarities between various individual things. This theory later came to be called nominalism. However, since Aristotle took these similarities to be constituted by a real commonality of form, he is more often considered a proponent of moderate realism. The Stoics made important contributions to the analysis of grammar, distinguishing five parts of speech: nouns, verbs, appellatives (names or epithets), conjunctions and articles. They also developed a sophisticated doctrine of the lektón associated with each sign of a language, but distinct from both the sign itself and the thing to which it refers. This lektón was the meaning or sense of every term. The complete lektón of a sentence is what we would now call its proposition. Only propositions were considered truth-bearing—meaning they could be considered true or false—while sentences were simply their vehicles of expression. Different lektá could also express things besides propositions, such as commands, questions and exclamations.

Medieval philosophy Medieval philosophers were greatly interested in the subtleties of language and its usage. For many scholastics, this interest was provoked by the necessity of translating Greek texts into Latin. There were several noteworthy philosophers of language in the medieval period. According to Peter J. King (though this has been disputed), Peter Abelard anticipated the modern theories of reference. Also, William of Ockham's Summa Logicae brought forward one of the first serious proposals for codifying a mental language. The scholastics of the high medieval period, such as Ockham and John Duns Scotus, considered logic to be a scientia sermocinalis (science of language). The result of their studies was the elaboration of linguistic-philosophical notions whose complexity and subtlety has only recently come to be appreciated. Many of the most interesting problems of modern philosophy of language were anticipated by medieval thinkers. The phenomena of vagueness and ambiguity were analyzed intensely, and this led to an increasing interest in problems related to the use of syncategorematic words, such as and, or, not, if, and every. The study of categorematic words (or terms) and their properties was also developed greatly. One of the major developments of the scholastics in this area was the doctrine of the suppositio. The suppositio of a term is the interpretation that is given of it in a specific context. It can be proper or improper (as when it is used in metaphor, metonym, and other figures of speech). A proper suppositio, in turn, can be either formal or material according to whether it refers to its usual non-linguistic referent (as in "Charles is a man"), or to itself as a linguistic entity (as in "'Charles' has seven letters"). Such a classification scheme is the precursor of modern distinctions between use and mention, and between language and metalanguage. There is a tradition called speculative grammar which existed from the 11th to the 13th century. Leading scholars included Martin of Dacia and Thomas of Erfurt (see Modistae).

Modern philosophy Linguists of the Renaissance and Baroque periods such as Johannes Goropius Becanus, Athanasius Kircher and John Wilkins were infatuated with the idea of a philosophical language reversing the confusion of tongues, influenced by the gradual discovery of Chinese characters and Egyptian hieroglyphs (Hieroglyphica). This thought parallels the idea that there might be a universal language of music. European scholarship began to absorb the Indian linguistic tradition only from the mid-18th century, pioneered by Jean François Pons and Henry Thomas Colebrooke (the editio princeps of Varadarāja, a 17th-century Sanskrit grammarian, dating to 1849). In the early 19th century, the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard insisted that language should play a larger role in Western philosophy. He argued that philosophy has not sufficiently focused on the role language plays in cognition and that future philosophy ought to proceed with a conscious focus on language:

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Philosophy of language illustration
Philosophy of language illustration
Philosophy of language: Example of a syntactic tree
Example of a syntactic tree

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Philosophy of language

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Philosophy of language claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Philosophy of language before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Philosophy of language ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Philosophy of language

In research
Philosophy of language appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Philosophy of language in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Philosophy of language is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Analytic philosophy, Philosophy of language, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Philosophy of language outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Philosophy of language” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Philosophy of language in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Philosophy of language means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Philosophy of language out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Philosophy of language in simple terms?

Philosophy of language is the study of the nature of language. It investigates the relationship between language, language users, and the world.

Why does Philosophy of language matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Philosophy of language?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Philosophy of language.

Tags

  • Analytic philosophy
  • Philosophy of language

Keep exploring