ArticleslgStudy

science

Pocket set theory

Pocket set theory is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Pocket set theory rather than just read about it. In short: Pocket set theory (PST) is an alternative set theory in which there are only two infinite cardinal numbers, ℵ0 (aleph-naught, the cardinality of the set of all natural numbers) and c (the cardinality of the continuum). The theory was first suggested by Rudy Rucker in his Infinity and the Mind.

Key takeaways

  • Pocket set theory belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Pocket set theory to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Pocket set theory from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Pocket set theory (PST) is an alternative set theory in which there are only two infinite cardinal numbers, ℵ0 (aleph-naught, the cardinality of the set of all natural numbers) and c (the cardinality of the continuum). The theory was first suggested by Rudy Rucker in his Infinity and the Mind. The details set out in this entry are due to the American mathematician M. Randall Holmes.

Arguments supporting PST There are at least two independent arguments in favor of a small set theory like PST.

One can get the impression from mathematical practice outside set theory that there are only two infinite cardinals which demonstrably are used "in classical mathematical practice outside set theory", (the cardinality of the natural numbers and the cardinality of the continuum), and therefore that "set theory produces far more superstructure than is needed to support classical mathematics". Although it may be an exaggeration (one can get into a situation in which one has to talk about arbitrary sets of real numbers or real functions), with some technical tricks a considerable portion of mathematics can be reconstructed within PST; certainly enough for most of its practical applications. A second argument arises from foundational considerations. Most of mathematics can be implemented in standard set theory or one of its large alternatives. Set theories, on the other hand, are introduced in terms of a logical system; in most cases it is first-order logic. The syntax and semantics of first-order logic, on the other hand, is built on set-theoretical grounds. Thus, there is a foundational circularity, which forces us to choose as weak a theory as possible for bootstrapping. This line of thought, again, leads to small set theories. Thus, there are reasons to think that Cantor's infinite hierarchy of the infinites is superfluous. Pocket set theory is a “minimalistic” set theory that allows for only two infinites: the cardinality ℵ 0 {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\aleph _{0}}} of the (standard) natural numbers and the cardinality 2 ℵ 0 {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {2^{\aleph _{0}}}} of the (standard) reals.

Theory PST uses standard first-order language with identity and the binary relation symbol ∈ {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\in }} . Ordinary variables are upper case X, Y, etc. In the intended interpretation, the variables these stand for classes, and the atomic formula X ∈ Y {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {X\in Y}} means "class X is an element of class Y". A set is a class that is an element of a class. Small case variables x, y, etc. stand for sets. A proper class is a class that is not a set. Two classes are equinumerous iff a bijection exists between them. A class is infinite iff it is equinumerous with one of its proper subclasses. The axioms of PST are

(A1) (extensionality) — Classes that have the same elements are the same.

∀ z ( z ∈ X ↔ z ∈ Y ) → X = Y {\displaystyle \forall z\,(z\in X\leftrightarrow z\in Y)\rightarrow X=Y}

(A2) (class comprehension) — If ϕ ( x ) {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\phi (x)}} is a formula, then there exists a class the elements of which are exactly those sets x that satisfy ϕ ( x ) {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {\phi (x)}} .

∃ Y ∀ x ( x ∈ Y ↔ ϕ ( x ) ) {\displaystyle \exists Y\forall x\,(x\in Y\leftrightarrow \phi (x))}

(A3) (axiom of infinity) — There is an infinite set, and all infinite sets are equinumerous.

∃ x ( i n f ( x ) ∧ ∀ y ( i n f ( y ) → x ≈ y ) ) {\displaystyle \exists x\,(\mathrm {inf} (x)\land \forall y\,(\mathrm {inf} (y)\rightarrow x\approx y))}

(inf(x) stands for “x is infinite”; x ≈ y {\displaystyle \scriptstyle {x\approx y}} abbreviates that x is equinumerous with y.) (A4) (limitation of size) – A class is a proper class if and only if it is equinumerous with all proper classes.

∀ X ∀ Y ( ( p r ( X ) ∧ p r ( Y ) ) ↔ ( p r ( X ) ∧ X ≈ Y ) ) {\displaystyle \forall X\forall Y\,((\mathrm {pr} (X)\land \mathrm {pr} (Y))\leftrightarrow (\mathrm {pr} (X)\land X\approx Y))}

(pr(X) stands for “X is a proper class”.)

Remarks on the axioms Although different kinds of variables are used for classes and sets, the language is not many-sorted; sets are identified with classes having the same extension. Small case variables are used as mere abbreviations for various contexts; e.g.,

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Pocket set theory

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Pocket set theory claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Pocket set theory before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Pocket set theory ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Pocket set theory

In research
Pocket set theory appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Pocket set theory in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Pocket set theory is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Systems of set theory, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Pocket set theory outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Pocket set theory” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Pocket set theory in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Pocket set theory means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Pocket set theory out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Pocket set theory in simple terms?

Pocket set theory (PST) is an alternative set theory in which there are only two infinite cardinal numbers, ℵ0 (aleph-naught, the cardinality of the set of all natural numbers) and c (the cardinality of the continuum). The theory was first suggested by Rudy Rucker in his Infinity and the Mind.

Why does Pocket set theory matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Pocket set theory?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Pocket set theory.

Tags

  • Systems of set theory

Keep exploring