ArticleslgStudy

mathematics

Political forecasting

Political forecasting is a mathematics topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Political forecasting rather than just read about it. In short: Political forecasting aims at forecasting the outcomes of political events. Political events can be a number of events such as diplomatic decisions, actions by political leaders and other areas relating to politicians and political institutions.

Key takeaways

  • Political forecasting belongs to mathematics; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Political forecasting to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Political forecasting from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Political forecasting aims at forecasting the outcomes of political events. Political events can be a number of events such as diplomatic decisions, actions by political leaders and other areas relating to politicians and political institutions. The area of political forecasting concerning elections is highly popular, especially amongst mass market audiences. Political forecasting methodology makes frequent use of mathematics, statistics and data science. Political forecasting as it pertains to elections is related to psephology.

History

People have long been interested in predicting election outcomes. Mentions of betting odds on papal succession appear as early as 1503, with such wagering being already considered an "old practice." Political betting in secular elections also has a long history in Great Britain. As one prominent example, Charles James Fox, the late-eighteenth-century Whig statesman, was known as an inveterate gambler. His biographer, George Otto Trevelyan, noted that"[f]or ten years, from 1771 onwards, Charles Fox betted frequently, largely, and judiciously, on the social and political occurrences of the time." Before the existence of widespread national polls in the early 20th century, betting odds provided a rudimentary form of election forecasting in the United States. According to Paul Rhode and Koleman Strumpf, who have researched the history of prediction markets, records of election betting in Wall Street back to 1884 exist. Rhode and Strumpf estimate that average betting turnover per US presidential election is equivalent to over 50 percent of the campaign expenditures, and betting odds correlate strongly to vote results. As far back as 1907, it was found that the median estimate of a group can be more accurate than individual expert estimates by Francis Galton. This is now known as the wisdom of the crowd. During the 19th century, local straw poles were also often held in cities and other locations throughout the United States. The first reported record of such poles is in the Raleigh Star and North Carolina State Gazette and the Wilmington American Watchman and Delaware Advertiser prior to the 1824 presidential election, showing Andrew Jackson leading John Quincy Adams by 335 votes to 169. Jackson would win the popular vote in that state and the country. In 1916, The Literary Digest took a national survey, one of the first ever taken, by mailing out millions of postcards and simply counting the returns, correctly predicting Woodrow Wilson's election as president. In this way, The Literary Digest also correctly predicted the victories of Warren Harding in 1920, Calvin Coolidge in 1924, Herbert Hoover in 1928, and Franklin Roosevelt in 1932. The problems with such a method would become apparent in the 1936 election, and at this time George Gallup and others would take smaller but more scientifically conducted polls, which have since become a basic part of political forecasting. With the advent of statistical techniques, electoral data have become increasingly easy to handle. It is no surprise, then, that election forecasting has become a big business, for polling firms, news organizations, and betting markets as well as academic students of politics. Academic scholars have constructed models of voting behavior to forecast the outcomes of elections. These forecasts are derived from theories and empirical evidence about what matters to voters when they make electoral choices. The forecast models typically rely on a few predictors in highly aggregated form, with an emphasis on phenomena that change in the short-run, such as the state of the economy, so as to offer maximum leverage for predicting the result of a specific election. In a national or state election, macroeconomic conditions, such as employment, new job creation, the interest rate, and the inflation rate are also considered. During the 1988 US presidential election, the University of Iowa's Tippie College of Business introduced the Iowa Electronic Markets, one of the first modern electronic prediction markets. Election forecasting in the United States was first brought to the attention of the wider public by Nate Silver and his FiveThirtyEight website in 2008. Currently, there are many competing models that exist to predict the outcomes of elections in the United States, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere. In October 2024, Kalshi, a financial exchange and prediction market, won a lawsuit against its regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, with a federal appeals court in Washington, allowing it to revive the first fully regulated election prediction markets in the United States. Kalshi's court victory over the CFTC opened the market for election markets.

Methods

Opinion polling Opinion polls can be undertaken to apprehend the public opinion of a particular sample, and extrapolate therefrom the voter preferences of the general population, which can be used to predict voter behavior during an election

Averaging polls Combining poll data lowers the forecasting mistakes of a poll.

Poll damping Poll damping is when incorrect indicators of public opinion are not used in a forecast model. For instance, early in the campaign, polls are poor measures of the future choices of voters. The poll results closer to an election are a more accurate prediction. Campbell shows the power of poll damping in political forecasting.

Regression models Political scientists and economists oftentimes use regression models of past elections. This is done to help forecast the votes of the political parties – for example, Democrats and Republicans in the US. The information helps their party's next presidential candidate forecast the future. Most models include at least one public opinion variable, a trial heat poll, or a presidential approval rating. Bayesian statistics can also be used to estimate the posterior distributions of the true proportion of voters that will vote for each candidate in each state, given both the polling data available and the previous election results for each state. Each poll can be weighted based on its age and its size, providing a highly dynamic forecasting mechanism as Election day approaches. http://electionanalytics.cs.illinois.edu/ is an example of a site that employs such methods.

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Political forecasting

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Political forecasting claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In mathematics, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Political forecasting before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Political forecasting ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Political forecasting

In research
Political forecasting appears in mathematics research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Political forecasting in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Political forecasting is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Political science, Regression with time series structure, Statistical forecasting, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Political forecasting outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Political forecasting” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Political forecasting in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Political forecasting means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Political forecasting out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Political forecasting in simple terms?

Political forecasting aims at forecasting the outcomes of political events. Political events can be a number of events such as diplomatic decisions, actions by political leaders and other areas relating to politicians and political institutions.

Why does Political forecasting matter?

Because it connects several mathematics ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Political forecasting?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Political forecasting.

Tags

  • Political science
  • Regression with time series structure
  • Statistical forecasting
  • Survey methodology

Keep exploring