In physics, the Polyakov action is an action of the two-dimensional conformal field theory describing the worldsheet of a string in string theory. It was introduced by Stanley Deser and Bruno Zumino and independently by L. Brink, P. Di Vecchia and P. S. Howe in 1976, and has become associated with Alexander Polyakov after he made use of it in quantizing the string in 1981. The action reads:
S = T 2 ∫ d 2 σ − h h a b g μ ν ( X ) ∂ a X μ ( σ ) ∂ b X ν ( σ ) , {\displaystyle {\mathcal {S}}={\frac {T}{2}}\int \mathrm {d} ^{2}\sigma \,{\sqrt {-h}}\,h^{ab}g_{\mu \nu }(X)\partial _{a}X^{\mu }(\sigma )\partial _{b}X^{\nu }(\sigma ),}
where T {\displaystyle T} is the string tension, g μ ν {\displaystyle g_{\mu \nu }} is the metric of the target manifold, h a b {\displaystyle h_{ab}} is the worldsheet metric, h a b {\displaystyle h^{ab}} its inverse, and h {\displaystyle h} is the determinant of h a b {\displaystyle h_{ab}} . The metric signature is chosen such that timelike directions are + and the spacelike directions are −. The spacelike worldsheet coordinate is called σ {\displaystyle \sigma } , whereas the timelike worldsheet coordinate is called τ {\displaystyle \tau } . This is also known as the nonlinear sigma model. The Polyakov action must be supplemented by the Liouville action to describe string fluctuations.
Global symmetries N.B.: Here, a symmetry is said to be local or global from the two dimensional theory (on the worldsheet) point of view. For example, Lorentz transformations, that are local symmetries of the space-time, are global symmetries of the theory on the worldsheet.
The action is invariant under spacetime translations and infinitesimal Lorentz transformations where ω μ ν = − ω ν μ {\displaystyle \omega _{\mu \nu }=-\omega _{\nu \mu }} , and b α {\displaystyle b^{\alpha }} is a constant. This forms the Poincaré symmetry of the target manifold. The invariance under (i) follows since the action S {\displaystyle {\mathcal {S}}} depends only on the first derivative of X α {\displaystyle X^{\alpha }} . The proof of the invariance under (ii) is as follows:
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

