Posterior motion preservation devices are spinal implants used in lumbar spine surgery to stabilize a motion segment after posterior decompression while attempting to preserve vaious degrees of segmental movement. They are used as alternatives to rigid spinal fusion in selected patients with degenerative lumbar conditions such as spinal stenosis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Posterior motion preservation systems emerged as alternatives to rigid lumbar fusion, with the goal of avoiding rigid fixation while maintaining neural decompression and segmental stability. These devices include interspinous and interlaminar implants, pedicle-based dynamic stabilization systems, posterior tension-band systems, posterior facet or posterior element replacement systems, and posterior total joint replacement systems.
Classification
Rationale Lumbar fusion is commonly performed after decompression is performed to address spinal instability or degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, fusion eliminates motion at the treated segment and may increase mechanical stress at adjacent levels. Posterior motion preservation devices were developed to provide stabilization while maintaining some degree of segmental motion at the operated level. The theoretical goals include reduction of back and leg symptoms, maintenance of foraminal or canal space, preservation of segmental motion, and reduction of adjacent segment degeneration. Clinical evidence varies substantially between device classes. Biomechanical studies of early posterior dynamic stabilization systems reported altered segmental load transfer and motion patterns compared with native spinal biomechanics. Several newer motion-preservation and posterior joint-replacement systems were developed after publication of many of these studies. Recent reviews distinguish facet and posterior-element replacement from other posterior motion-preservation approaches because these systems are intended to restore stability after decompression while retaining segmental motion. The reviews identify motion preservation and the potential reduction of adjacent-segment disease as proposed advantages, while emphasizing careful patient selection and the need for long-term durability data. Different device classes reflect varying approaches to balancing decompression, spinal stability, and preservation of motion, and may be applied to different patient populations depending on pathology and surgical requirements. The relationship between these approaches and representative device categories is summarized below.
The theoretical characteristics of these approaches are summarized below.
Interspinous and interlaminar devices
DIAM The Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM) is an interspinous stabilization implant designed to limit extension and unload posterior spinal elements following decompression. It has also been used adjacent to spinal fusion constructs in an attempt to reduce adjacent segment degeneration. The implant consists of a silicone elastomer core covered by a polyester mesh and secured between adjacent spinous processes using tethering bands. The device was developed to provide flexible posterior stabilization while preserving partial segmental motion. Biomechanical studies of DIAM and other interspinous implants have shown that these devices mainly stabilize the treated segment in extension, with more limited effects in flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Finite-element analysis of DIAM after minimally invasive decompression also reported altered range of motion and stress redistribution at posterior elements. Clinical evidence for DIAM has been mixed. Some observational and randomized studies reported improvements in pain and disability, while other studies reported variable durability and reoperation rates. A randomized study of DIAM for lumbar degenerative disc disease compared the implant with non-operative treatment, with crossover permitted after six months. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing interspinous process spacers with traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis reported that the use of interspinous spacers remained controversial, particularly because of higher reoperation rates despite some perioperative advantages. Long-term superiority over fusion or decompression-based surgical approaches has not been consistently demonstrated, and reported complications included recurrent stenosis, recurrent disc herniation, post-laminectomy spondylolisthesis, implant-related issues, and conversion to fusion surgery in some patients. In 2025, the DIAM Spinal Stabilization System received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) premarket approval for treatment of moderate to severe primary low back pain associated with single-level degenerative disc disease from L2 to L5 in patients who remained symptomatic after at least six months of non-operative treatment. Although use of DIAM declined in some regions over time, the system contributed to the development of posterior dynamic stabilization and motion-preservation concepts in lumbar spine surgery.
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
