ArticleslgStudy

science

Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study

Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study rather than just read about it. In short: The Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) Study is a prospective cohort study of 4,512 women who have never given birth, recruited at the Rosie Hospital (Cambridge, UK) between January 2008 and July 2012. Staff and funding The Principal Investigator is Gordon Smith of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (University of Cambridge, UK).

Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study — main illustration
Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) Study is a prospective cohort study of 4,512 women who have never given birth, recruited at the Rosie Hospital (Cambridge, UK) between January 2008 and July 2012.

Staff and funding The Principal Investigator is Gordon Smith of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (University of Cambridge, UK). Lab work using the biobank of samples is led by Stephen Charnock-Jones of the same department. The POP study is supported by the Women's Health and Paediatrics theme of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), which is based at the Cambridge Biomedical Campus (UK). Other funding sources for the projects related to the POP study are the Medical Research Council (UK), the NIHR, the Wellcome Trust, the British Heart Foundation, and the Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Society (now known as Sands), as well as Industry supported studies.

Background In 2007, Cambridge (UK) received funding from NIHR to establish a comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The Cambridge BRC Women's Health and Paediatrics theme focuses on tackling the origins, treatment and prevention of many of the health issues that affect women during their reproductive years. The bulk of the Cambridge BRC funding for the first five years of the theme supported the POP study. Over recent years, we have witnessed a great improvement in population-based screening methods for fetal abnormalities as a result of technological developments in ultrasound, biochemical screening and molecular genetics. However, the methods for screening the low risk population for other complications of pregnancy such as fetal growth restriction (FGR), pre-eclampsia and stillbirth have remained largely unchanged for the past 20–30 years. The UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has highlighted a number of research priorities in their guidelines for pregnancy care. These include a focus on improving the screening of apparently healthy pregnant women and identify those at high risk of complications. This area is the main focus of the POP study.

Design and aims Nulliparous women with a viable singleton pregnancy were recruited to the POP study when attending their dating ultrasound scan at The Rosie Hospital (Cambridge, UK). The only clinical exclusion criterion was multiple pregnancy. Participants had serial ultrasound scans and blood obtained at recruitment, 20, 28 and 36 weeks of gestation. DNA samples and height/weight measurements of the partners were also collected. After delivery, biopsies of the placenta, placental membranes, umbilical cord, and a sample of cord blood were collected. Thorough design of the POP study and careful sample collection allowed the creation of an extensive, optimally phenotyped biobank of complicated and healthy pregnancies, including approximately 230,000 blood and tissue samples stored in -80 °C freezers, 24,000 formalin fixed placental biopsies, and 4,000 paternal DNA samples. The types of samples collected during the POP study reflect, first of all, the focus on the role of the placenta and its altered development and function in several major complications of pregnancy. Second, they reflect the interest in circulating biomarkers since, despite years of intensive research, screening for these conditions is still largely based upon clinical grounds rather than ultrasonic and/or biochemical assessment of placental function. Therefore the projects based on the samples from the POP study have the following aims:

understanding the mechanisms leading to placentally-related complications, such as pre-eclampsia, FGR and stillbirth; studying the association between pregnancy complications and the presence of infectious agents in the placenta; evaluating the performance of known biomarkers and serial ultrasonography in assessing maternal and fetal well-being; discovering novel, placentally-derived circulating biomarkers which reflect the underlying pathology and are highly sensitive and specific in predicting the associated disease.

Key findings Multiple projects based on this data have been published and many are currently on-going. The key findings obtained so far studying the samples from the POP study are (see paragraph "Research papers" for a complete list of publications):

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study: Logo of the POP study.
Logo of the POP study.
Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study illustration
Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study illustration
Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study: Logo of the POPS2.
Logo of the POPS2.
Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study: Logo of the POPStar study.
Logo of the POPStar study.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study

In research
Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Cohort studies, Cohort study methods, Health issues in pregnancy, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study in simple terms?

The Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) Study is a prospective cohort study of 4,512 women who have never given birth, recruited at the Rosie Hospital (Cambridge, UK) between January 2008 and July 2012. Staff and funding The Principal Investigator is Gordon Smith of the Department of Obstetrics and…

Why does Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study.

Tags

  • Cohort studies
  • Cohort study methods
  • Health issues in pregnancy
  • Human pregnancy
  • Pathology of pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium
  • Tests during pregnancy
  • Women's health

Keep exploring