ArticleslgStudy

science

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues rather than just read about it. In short: The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (the Bioethics Commission) was created by Executive Order 13521 on November 24, 2009. The Bioethics Commission advised President Barack Obama on bioethical issues arising from advances in biomedicine and related areas of science and technology.

Key takeaways

  • Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (the Bioethics Commission) was created by Executive Order 13521 on November 24, 2009. The Bioethics Commission advised President Barack Obama on bioethical issues arising from advances in biomedicine and related areas of science and technology. It replaced The President's Council on Bioethics appointed by United States President George W. Bush to advise his administration on bioethics, and the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (1996-2001). No national organization replaced it when its authorization expired; it "held its final meeting at the end of August 2016 and closed its doors."

Reports Bioethics for Every Generation: Deliberation and Education in Health, Science, and Technology, published in May 2016, provides eight recommendations to strengthen and advance deliberation and education to improve policy-making in bioethics, and to create a more democratic and just society. Gray Matters: Topics at the Intersection of Neuroscience, Ethics, and Society (Gray Matters, Vol. 2), published March 2015, seeks to clarify the scientific landscape, identify common ground, and recommend ethical paths forward, broadly focusing its analysis on three topics: cognitive enhancement, consent capacity, and neuroscience and the legal system. Ethics and Ebola: Public Health Planning and Response, published in February 2015, provides seven recommendations offering targeted policy and research design suggestions, including the integration of ethical principles into timely and agile public health decision making processes employed in response to rapidly unfolding epidemics. Gray Matters: Integrative Approaches for Neuroscience, Ethics, and Society (Gray Matters, Vol. 1), published in May 2014, recommends an early and explicit integration of ethics throughout research, as well as the integration of ethics and science through education at all levels, the evaluation of existing and innovative approaches to ethics integration, and the explicit inclusion of ethical perspectives on advisory and review bodies. Anticipate and Communicate: Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts, published in December 2013, recommends that all practitioners anticipate and plan for incidental and secondary findings and communicate that plan to patients, research participants, and consumers so they are informed ahead of time about what to expect. Safeguarding Children: Pediatric Medical Countermeasure Research, published in March 2013, concluded that the federal government would have to take multiple steps before anthrax vaccine trials with children could be ethically considered. Privacy and Progress in Whole Genome Sequencing, published in October 2012, concluded that to realize the enormous promise that whole genome sequencing holds for advancing clinical care as a public good, individual interests in privacy must be respected and secured. Moral Science: Protecting Participants in Human Subjects Research, published in December 2011, recommends 14 changes to current practices to better protect participants in research. In particular, the Commission called on the federal government to improve its tracking of research programs supported with taxpayer dollars. "Ethically Impossible": STD Research in Guatemala from 1946 to 1948, published in September 2011, concluded that the Guatemala syphilis experiments "involved unconscionable basic violations of ethics, even as judged against the researchers’ own recognition of the requirements of the medical ethics of the day". New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies, published in December 2010, recommended increased federal oversight of synthetic biology research.

Educational Materials Commission-developed bioethics educational materials are freely available for download from the archived Bioethics Commission website [2]. They are intended to be adapted for use in diverse learning contexts, including K-12 and higher education classrooms, professional education, and community settings. Bioethics Commission educational materials include:

User Guides are quick reference guides for professionals or educators to relevant educational materials. Primers outline a practical application, such as addressing scientific hype in neuroscience, of selected Bioethics Commission recommendations. Topic-based modules focus on topics common to several Bioethics Commission reports, such as community engagement or research design, to support integrating ethics in the classroom. Classroom discussion guides provide discussion prompts and questions for instructors at various levels. Case studies explore ethical issues including communication and use of liberty-restricting public health interventions in public health emergencies. Empirical research resources include datasets that can be used to teach about or conduct research in bioethics and related fields. Deliberative scenarios provide an introduction with teacher companions to the process of democratic deliberation, focusing on topics including the use of prescription stimulants for enhanced academic performance or the return of genetic research results. Podcast discussion guides outline discussion questions to be used in conjunction with the Bioethics Commission’s podcast series, Ethically Sound. Videos and webinars about Bioethics Commission work are available.

Members Amy Gutmann, Ph.D., Chair James W. Wagner, Ph.D., Vice Chair Anita L. Allen, J.D., Ph.D. Lonnie Ali, M.B.A John D. Arras, Ph.D. Barbara F. Atkinson, M.D. Nita A. Farahany, J.D., Ph.D. Alexander G. Garza, M.D. Christine Grady, R.N., Ph.D. Stephen L. Hauser, M.D. Raju S. Kucherlapati, Ph.D. Nelson Lee Michael, M.D., Ph.D. Daniel Sulmasy, M.D., Ph.D.

Bioethics Commission Staff The Bioethics Commission was supported by a staff [3] that provided research, communication, management, and administrative support for its activities. Lisa M. Lee, Ph.D., M.A., M.S. (2012-2017) and Valerie Bonham, J.D. (2010-2011) served as executive director. The research staff, senior advisors, and consultants included public health scientists, educators, lawyers, philosophers, geneticists, and historians, among others.

References

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues

In research
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Bioethics, Establishments by United States executive order, Ethics commissions, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues in simple terms?

The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (the Bioethics Commission) was created by Executive Order 13521 on November 24, 2009. The Bioethics Commission advised President Barack Obama on bioethical issues arising from advances in biomedicine and related areas of science and tec…

Why does Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.

Tags

  • Bioethics
  • Establishments by United States executive order
  • Ethics commissions
  • Government agencies established in 2009
  • Presidency of Barack Obama
  • United States presidential commissions

Keep exploring