Procedure words (abbreviated to prowords) are words or phrases limited to radiotelephony procedure used to facilitate communication by conveying information in a condensed standard verbal format. Prowords are voice versions of the much older procedural signs for Morse code which were first developed in the 1860s for Morse telegraphy, and their meaning is identical. The NATO communications manual ACP-125 contains the most formal and perhaps earliest modern (post-World War II) glossary of prowords, but its definitions have been adopted by many other organizations, including the United Nations Development Programme, the U.S. Coast Guard, US Civil Air Patrol, US Military Auxiliary Radio System, and others. Prowords are one of several structured parts of radio voice procedures, including brevity codes and plain language radio checks.
Examples According to the U.S. Marine Corps training document FMSO 108, "understanding the following PROWORDS and their respective definitions is the key to clear and concise communication procedures".
This is ... This transmission is from the station whose designator immediately follows. For clarity, the station called should also be named, before the station calling. For example, "Victor Juliet zero, this is Golf Mike Oscar three...," or for brevity, "Victor Juliet zero, Golf Mike Oscar three...." The reverse ("This is GMO3 calling VJ0") is never allowed.
Over "This is the end of my transmission to you and a response is necessary. Go ahead: transmit."
Out "This is the end of my transmission to you, and no answer is required or expected." "Over" and "Out" are never used at the same time, as their meanings are mutually exclusive.
Do you read? A question about whether the receiver can hear and understand the transmission. Example: "Bob, you read me? What is the situation from your position?" Example:
Roger "ROGER" may not be used to mean "yes" with regard to confirming a command; in Air Traffic Control phraseology, it does not signify that a clearance has been given. The term originates from the practice of telegraphers sending an "R" to stand for "received" after successfully getting a message. This was extended into spoken radio during World War II, with the "R" changed to the spelling alphabet equivalent word "Roger". The modern NATO spelling alphabet uses the word "Romeo" for "R" instead of "Roger", and "Romeo" is sometimes used for the same purpose as "Roger", mainly in Australian maritime operations.
Wilco "I understand and will comply." It is used on receipt of an order. "Roger" and "Wilco" used together (e.g. "Roger, Wilco") are redundant, since "Wilco" includes the acknowledgement element of "Roger".
Say again "I have not understood your message, please SAY AGAIN". Usually used with prowords "ALL AFTER" or "ALL BEFORE". Example: radio working between Solent Coastguard and a motor vessel, call-sign EG 93, where part of the initial transmission is unintelligible. Example:
At this juncture, Solent Coastguard would reply, preceding the message with the prowords "I SAY AGAIN":
The word "REPEAT" should not be used in place of "SAY AGAIN", especially on artillery fire control nets, as "REPEAT" is an artillery proword defined in ACP 125 U.S. Supp-2(A) with the wholly different meaning of "request for the same volume of fire to be fired again with or without corrections or changes" (e.g., at the same coordinates as the previous round).
All after... "Please repeat the message you just sent me beginning after the word or phrase said after this proword." Example:
At this juncture, Solent Coastguard would reply, preceding the message after "position" with the prowords "I SAY AGAIN":
All before... "Please repeat the message you just sent me ending before the word or phrase said after this proword."
Wait over "Wait for some time."
Standby "I must pause for a few seconds."
Wait out "I must pause for longer than a few seconds.."
Read back "Please repeat my entire transmission back to me."
I read back "The following is my response to your READ BACK proword."
Correction "I made an error in this transmission. Transmission will continue with the last word correctly sent."
Radio check "What is my signal strength and readability; how do you hear me?" The sender requests a response indicating the strength and readability of their transmission, according to plain language radio check standards:
A response of ROGER is shorthand for the prowords LOUD AND CLEAR. A response of WEAK BUT READABLE ("WEAK READABLE" is also used) indicates a weak signal but I can understand. A response of WEAK AND DISTORTED indicates a weak signal and unreadable. A response of STRONG BUT DISTORTED indicates a strong signal but unreadable. One of the two stations might be slightly off frequency, there might be multipath distortion, or there might be a problem with the audio circuits on one or both of the radios. "5 by 5" is an older term used to assess radio signals, as in 5 out of 5 units for both signal strength and readability. Other terms similar to 5x5 are "LOUD AND CLEAR" or "Lima and Charlie". Example:
Similar example in shorter form:
If the initiating station (Alpha 12 in the example) cannot hear the responding station (X-ray 23 above), then the initiator attempts a radio-check again, or if the responder's signal was not heard, the initiator replies to the responder with "Negative contact, Alpha 12 OUT". The following readability scale is used: 1 = bad (unreadable); 2 = poor (readable now and then); 3 = fair (readable, but with difficulty); 4 = good (readable); 5 = excellent (perfectly readable). Example of correct US Army radio check, for receiver A-11 (Alpha 11) and sender D-12 (Delta 12):
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
