Psychological resistance, also known as psychological resistance to change, is a phenomenon in clinical psychology and counseling psychology in which patients either directly or indirectly exhibit paradoxical opposing behaviors in presumably a clinically initiated push and pull of a change process. In other words, the concept of psychological resistance is that patients are likely to resist physician suggestions to change behavior or accept certain treatments regardless of whether that change will improve their condition. It impedes the development of authentic, reciprocally nurturing experiences in a clinical setting. Psychological resistance can manifest in various ways, such as denying the existence or severity of a problem, rationalizing or minimizing one's responsibility for it, rejecting or distrusting the therapist's or consultant's suggestions, withholding or distorting information, or sabotaging the treatment process. According to Edward and Faith Teyber, a common source of resistances and defenses is shame. This and similar negative attitudes may be the result of social stigmatization of a particular condition, such as psychological resistance towards insulin treatment of diabetes. Examples of psychological resistance may include perfectionism, criticizing, disrespectful attitude, being self-critical, preoccupation with appearance, social withdrawal, need to be seen as independent and invulnerable, or an inability to accept compliments or constructive criticism. Resistance can be very high, such as inducing conflict, or low such as conceding to everything.
Origins and Theoretical Background
The concept of resistance was first introduced by Sigmund Freud, who described it as an unconscious process in which patients defend against the emergence of anxiety-provoking thoughts or feelings. In classical psychoanalytic theory, resistance was considered a key barrier to free association and insight. Later theorists, such as Anna Freud and Wilhelm Reich, elaborated its forms and links to defense mechanisms. Modern approaches, including psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, and humanistic models, interpret resistance more broadly as a natural response to perceived threat or loss of control.
Types of Resistance Scholars have described multiple forms of resistance, commonly categorized as:
Realistic resistance: Rational or conscious opposition based on genuine disagreement with the therapist’s approach or perceived irrelevance of treatment. Interpersonal resistance: Relational behaviors such as withdrawal, compliance without engagement, or hostility, often reflecting underlying dynamics within the therapeutic alliance. Trait vs. state resistance: Trait resistance refers to a stable disposition toward autonomy or reactance, while state resistance is context-dependent, emerging from specific situations or perceived threats. These distinctions help clinicians differentiate between functional self-protection and nonadaptive avoidance, informing careful tailored interventions.
Contemporary understandings
Realistic resistance Realistic resistance is the understanding of the conscious and deliberate aspect of psychological resistance in therapeutic treatment. "Realistic resistance refers to clients' conscious, deliberate opposition to therapeutic initiatives that they fail to understand or accept". There are several things an individual may disagree with in the therapy setting that can lead to realistic psychological resistance, such as general therapeutic technique or words and phrases utilized by a physician or therapist. Realistic resistance can be identified by behavioral markers. Some examples include avoidance of certain lines of questioning, outright refusal to cooperate, and sudden loss of effort and interest during sessions. Realistic resistance can have negative consequences for the therapeutic process and outcome, such as reducing client engagement, motivation, and adherence to treatment. Therefore, it is important for therapists to identify the above mentioned behavioral markers to address realistic resistance in a collaborative and empathic manner.
Strategies to address realistic resistance To manage realistic resistance, it is important to ensure that the client is kept in the loop which can be done by explaining the rationale and evidence for the therapeutic approach and techniques. This could be achieved by inviting feedback and questions from the client. Additionally, therapists often use motivational interviewing techniques to elicit the client's reasons for change, explore ambivalence, and enhance self-efficacy. Adapting the language and style of communication to match the client's preferences, needs, and level of understanding as well as involving the client in setting goals and choosing interventions, and offering choices and alternatives when possible also helps validate the client's feelings, thereby lowering the resistance. These strategies help in reframing resistance as a sign of strength, and highlighting the client's autonomy and responsibility for change.
Interpersonal resistance Resistance is based on instinctively autonomous ways of reacting in which clients both reveal and keep hidden aspects of themselves from the therapist or another person. These behaviors occur mostly during therapy, in interaction with the therapist. It is a way of avoiding and yet expressing unacceptable drives, feelings, fantasies, and behavior patterns. Examples of causes of resistance include: resistance to the recognition of feelings, fantasies, and motives; resistance to revealing feelings toward the therapist; resistance as a way of demonstrating self-sufficiency; resistance as clients' reluctance to change their behavior outside the therapy room; resistance as a consequence of failure of empathy on the part of the therapist. Examples of the expression of resistance are canceling or rescheduling appointments, avoiding consideration of identified themes, forgetting to complete homework assignments, and the like. This will make it more difficult for the therapist to work with the client, but it will also provide him with information about the client.
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
