In microeconomics and decision theory, Rabin's calibration theorem (also known as Rabin's paradox or Rabin's critique) is a theoretical result related to the calibration of risk aversion within expected-utility theory. In intuitive terms, it shows that an expected-utility-maximizer who is moderately risk averse over small-stake gambles must show implausibly high risk aversion over high stakes. It is seen as critique of how the classical model of diminishing marginal utility of wealth can deal with representing risk-averse behavior over money within expected-utility theory. The result was first shown by Matthew Rabin in 2000. It has since been extended to non-expected-utility models of choice under uncertainty.
Example Consider an expected-utility decision-maker with wealth level w {\displaystyle w} and concave Bernoulli utility function u {\displaystyle u} . Imagine that she rejects the following lottery:
L = { win $ 125 with 50 % chance, lose $ 100 with 50 % chance. {\displaystyle L={\begin{cases}{\text{win }}\$125{\text{ with }}50\%{\text{ chance,}}\\{\text{lose }}\$100{\text{ with }}50\%{\text{ chance.}}\end{cases}}}
This implies that
0.5 u ( w + 125 ) + 0.5 u ( w − 100 ) < u ( w ) {\displaystyle 0.5u(w+125)+0.5u(w-100)<u(w)}
⟺ u ( w + 125 ) − u ( w ) < u ( w ) − u ( w − 100 ) {\displaystyle \iff u(w+125)-u(w)<u(w)-u(w-100)}
⟺ u ( w + 125 ) − u ( w ) 125 < 100 125 u ( w ) − u ( w − 100 ) 100 . {\displaystyle \iff {\frac {u(w+125)-u(w)}{125}}<{\frac {100}{125}}{\frac {u(w)-u(w-100)}{100}}.}
Since u {\displaystyle u} is concave, we have
u ′ ( w + 125 ) < u ( w + 125 ) − u ( w ) 125 < 100 125 u ( w ) − u ( w − 100 ) 100 < 100 125 u ′ ( w − 100 ) . {\displaystyle u'(w+125)<{\frac {u(w+125)-u(w)}{125}}<{\frac {100}{125}}{\frac {u(w)-u(w-100)}{100}}<{\frac {100}{125}}u'(w-100).}
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
