ArticleslgStudy

science

Red Earth, White Lies

Red Earth, White Lies is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Red Earth, White Lies rather than just read about it. In short: Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact is a book by Native American author Vine Deloria, originally published in 1995. The book's central theme is to criticize the scientific consensus regarding the history of the Americas and the age of the Earth.

Red Earth, White Lies — main illustration
Red Earth, White Lies — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Red Earth, White Lies belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Red Earth, White Lies to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Red Earth, White Lies from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact is a book by Native American author Vine Deloria, originally published in 1995. The book's central theme is to criticize the scientific consensus regarding the history of the Americas and the age of the Earth. He stated that in this book "We will encounter a number of amazing inconsistencies in the manner in which science describes the world we live in and the role it has chosen for American Indians to play in a largely fictional scenario describing prehistoric North America.

Overview The book's particular focus is on a criticism of current models of migration to the New World, in particular the Bering land bridge theory. Deloria attempts to expose what he thought were fundamental weaknesses in this theory by detailing supposed archeological inconsistencies and positing alternative hypotheses that he believed align better with his understanding of the origins of Native Americans. He argued that there was an earlier presence for indigenous peoples in the Americas than what the archaeological record provides. In a similar vein, he criticized the so-called "overkill hypothesis", which proposes that humans migrating into the Americas were partially responsible, by overhunting, for the sudden and rapid extinction of North American megafauna during the Pleistocene epoch. Deloria believed that this hypothesis was racist; he contended that the Pleistocene extinction had no parallel on such a scale in Eurasia, which also experienced the sudden arrival of human hunters. Deloria likened the dominant migration theory to "academic folklore" and contended that even though it was regularly cited as fact, it was not critically examined within the field of archeology. Further, he charged that prevailing theories did not mesh with Native American oral traditions, which he contended contain no accounts of inter-continental migration. He argued for a Young Earth with only one Ice Age, for a worldwide flood, and for the survival of dinosaurs into the 19th century.

Criticism John Whittaker, a Professor of Archaeology at Grinnell College, referred to Deloria's Red Earth, White Lies as "a wretched piece of Native American creationist claptrap that has all the flaws of the Biblical creationists he disdains...Deloria's style is drearily familiar to anyone who has read the Biblical creationist literature...At the core is a wishful attempt to discredit all science because some facts clash with belief systems. A few points will suffice to show how similar Deloria is to outspoken creationist author Duane Gish or any of his ilk." Michael D. Gordin notes the book's close ties to Immanuel Velikovsky's cosmographical works, especially the revindication of oral myth and tradition as central to revising both history and myths' role in the study of history. Deloria had entered Velikovsky's circle in 1974, calling the psychologist "perhaps the greatest brain that our race has produced." Gordin concludes Deloria's rejection of the Bering land bridge and "attack on any affinity between Native tradition and Western culture and science" was derived from Velikovskian catastrophism, though Velikovsky himself rejected any hint of creationism. Deloria's son, historian Philip J. Deloria, takes up his father's theme of "deep-time" historians. Despite admitting a wish that the book "had been more attentive to evidence, historiography, interpretation and argument," he notes that it did reveal problems with "supposedly neutral science-based narratives of the deep past," many of which have since been revised or replaced altogether. Vine Deloria, he suggests, wanted those writing about the deep past to stop "universalizing their own epistemic position" and to accept that Indigenous histories might have something to teach them.

See also Beringia Models of migration to the New World

References

Further reading Francis, Norbert (August 22, 2017). "Chapter 7: Creationist pseudoscience in the American university". Bilingual and Multicultural Perspectives on Poetry, Music, and Narrative: The Science of Art. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. pp. 149–169. ISBN 9781498551847. LCCN 2017023884. "Vine Deloria Jr, Creationism, and Ethnic Pseudoscience". National Center for Science Education. Retrieved 19 August 2024.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Red Earth, White Lies

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Red Earth, White Lies claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Red Earth, White Lies before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Red Earth, White Lies ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Red Earth, White Lies

In research
Red Earth, White Lies appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Red Earth, White Lies in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Red Earth, White Lies is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1997 non-fiction books, Books about creationism, Creationist publications, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Red Earth, White Lies outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Red Earth, White Lies” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Red Earth, White Lies in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Red Earth, White Lies means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Red Earth, White Lies out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Red Earth, White Lies in simple terms?

Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact is a book by Native American author Vine Deloria, originally published in 1995. The book's central theme is to criticize the scientific consensus regarding the history of the Americas and the age of the Earth.

Why does Red Earth, White Lies matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Red Earth, White Lies?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Red Earth, White Lies.

Tags

  • 1997 non-fiction books
  • Books about creationism
  • Creationist publications
  • Native American creationism
  • Pseudohistory
  • Sociology books
  • Works by Vine Deloria Jr.
  • Young Earth creationism

Keep exploring