ArticleslgStudy

biology

Rejection of evolution by religious groups

Rejection of evolution by religious groups is a biology topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Rejection of evolution by religious groups rather than just read about it. In short: Recurring cultural, political, and theological rejection of evolution by religious groups exists regarding the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. In accordance with creationism, species were once widely believed to be fixed products of divine creation, but since the mid-19th century, evolution by natural selection has been established by the scientific community as a scientific fact.

Rejection of evolution by religious groups — main illustration
Rejection of evolution by religious groups — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Rejection of evolution by religious groups belongs to biology; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Rejection of evolution by religious groups to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Rejection of evolution by religious groups from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Recurring cultural, political, and theological rejection of evolution by religious groups exists regarding the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. In accordance with creationism, species were once widely believed to be fixed products of divine creation, but since the mid-19th century, evolution by natural selection has been established by the scientific community as a scientific fact. Any such debate is universally considered religious, not scientific, by professional scientific organizations worldwide: in the scientific community, evolution is accepted as fact, and efforts to sustain the traditional view are universally regarded as pseudoscience. While the controversy has a long history, today it has retreated to be mainly over what constitutes good science education, with the politics of creationism primarily focusing on the teaching of creationism in public education. Among majority-Christian countries, the debate is largely limited to the United States, where it may be portrayed as part of a culture war. Parallel controversies also exist in some other religious communities, such as the more fundamentalist branches of Judaism and Islam. In Europe and elsewhere, creationism is much more marginal (notably, the Anglican Communion, Lutheran churches and other mainline Protestant churches all accept evolution), and there is very little pressure to teach it as fact. Christian fundamentalists reject the evidence of common descent of humans and other animals as demonstrated in modern paleontology, genetics, histology and cladistics and those other sub-disciplines which are based upon the conclusions of modern evolutionary biology, geology, cosmology, and other related fields. They argue for the Abrahamic accounts of creation, and, in order to attempt to gain a place alongside evolutionary biology in the science classroom, have developed a rhetorical framework of "creation science". In the landmark Kitzmiller v. Dover, the purported basis of scientific creationism was judged to be a wholly religious construct without scientific merit. The Catholic Church holds no official position on creation or evolution (see Evolution and the Catholic Church). However, Pope Francis has stated: "God is not a demiurge or a magician, but the Creator who brought everything to life...Evolution in nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of beings that evolve." The rules of genetic inheritance were discovered by the Augustinian friar Gregor Mendel, who is known today as the founder of modern genetics.

History

The creation–evolution controversy began in Europe and North America in the late 18th century, when new interpretations of geological evidence led to various theories of an ancient Earth, and findings of extinctions demonstrated in the fossil geological sequence prompted early ideas of evolution, notably Lamarckism. In England these ideas of continuing change were at first seen as a threat to the existing "fixed" social order, and both church and state sought to repress them. Conditions gradually eased, and in 1844 Robert Chambers's controversial Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation popularized the idea of gradual transmutation of species. The scientific establishment at first dismissed it scornfully and the Church of England reacted with fury, but many Unitarians, Quakers and Baptists—groups opposed to the privileges of the established church—favoured its ideas of God acting through such natural laws.

Contemporary reaction to Darwin

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Rejection of evolution by religious groups: A satirical cartoon from 1882, parodying Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, on the publication of The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms (1881)
A satirical cartoon from 1882, parodying Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, on the publication of The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms (1881)
Rejection of evolution by religious groups illustration
Rejection of evolution by religious groups illustration
Rejection of evolution by religious groups: A satirical image of Darwin as an ape from 1871 reflects part of the social controversy over the common lineage of humans and apes.
A satirical image of Darwin as an ape from 1871 reflects part of the social controversy over the common lineage of humans and apes.
Rejection of evolution by religious groups: Asa Gray around the time he published Darwiniana.
Asa Gray around the time he published Darwiniana.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Rejection of evolution by religious groups

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Rejection of evolution by religious groups claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In biology, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Rejection of evolution by religious groups before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Rejection of evolution by religious groups ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Rejection of evolution by religious groups

In research
Rejection of evolution by religious groups appears in biology research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Rejection of evolution by religious groups in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Rejection of evolution by religious groups is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Biology controversies, Creationism, Denialism, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Rejection of evolution by religious groups outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Rejection of evolution by religious groups in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Rejection of evolution by religious groups means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Rejection of evolution by religious groups out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Rejection of evolution by religious groups in simple terms?

Recurring cultural, political, and theological rejection of evolution by religious groups exists regarding the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. In accordance with creationism, species were once widely believed to be fixed products of divine creation, but since the mid-19th cent…

Why does Rejection of evolution by religious groups matter?

Because it connects several biology ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Rejection of evolution by religious groups?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Rejection of evolution by religious groups.

Tags

  • Biology controversies
  • Creationism
  • Denialism
  • Evolution and religion

Keep exploring