ArticleslgStudy

science

Renée Baillargeon

Renée Baillargeon is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Renée Baillargeon rather than just read about it. In short: Renée Baillargeon (French: [ʁəne bajaʁʒɔ̃]; born 1954) is a Canadian American research psychologist. A distinguished professor of Psychology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Baillargeon specializes in the development of cognition in infancy.

Key takeaways

  • Renée Baillargeon belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Renée Baillargeon to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Renée Baillargeon from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Renée Baillargeon (French: [ʁəne bajaʁʒɔ̃]; born 1954) is a Canadian American research psychologist. A distinguished professor of Psychology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Baillargeon specializes in the development of cognition in infancy. Educated at McGill University and the University of Pennsylvania, Baillargeon is the recipient of the American Psychological Association's Boyd R. McCandless Young Scientist Award.

Life and career Born in Quebec, Canada, Baillargeon is the third child of French-Canadian parents. She is best known for her research showing that infants have an intuitive awareness of physical laws such as solidity, containment, and occlusion at a young age. However, her research interests encompass a variety of issues in causal reasoning, focusing not only on the physical but also the psychological, sociomoral, and biological domains. Baillargeon received a B.A. in Psychology from McGill University in 1975 and a Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania in 1981 under the supervision of Rochel Gelman and Elizabeth Spelke. Subsequently, from 1981 to 1982, Baillargeon completed a postdoctoral fellowship at MIT under the supervision of Susan Carey. She received her first academic appointment at the University of Texas at Austin in 1982, a year later she moved to the University of Illinois where she has remained since.

Research

Causal reasoning domains Baillargeon spends much of her career researching infant development through the lens of domains. Domains are unique frameworks that allow infants to reason and learn about events. Baillargeon identifies four causal reasoning domains entitled physical reasoning, psychological reasoning, sociomoral reasoning, and biological reasoning. Each of the four domains focus on a specific expectation that infants have when witnessing a phenomenon.

Improving understanding of infant cognition Baillargeon's research on causal reasoning in infants furthered understanding concerning Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Piaget's experiments on the development of a concept of object permanence in infants required the children to manually search for the hidden object by pulling a cover off to reveal the object. Baillargeon argues that Piaget's finding regarding infants' failure to understand object permanence until 8–12 months old was rooted in a lack of motor ability as opposed to inadequate cognitive development. In an effort to account for infants' lack of motor skills, Baillargeon's studies of object permanence measure infants' fixation times on (i.e., how long they spend looking at) impossible versus possible events. Infants spent longer times looking at events that defied physical laws applied to obscured objects, implying that infants do, indeed, understand object permanence. A study by Baillargeon and colleague Julie DeVos confirmed the concept of object permanence in infants as young as 3.5 months old. Through the use of an eye tracker, Baillargeon and DeVos concluded that the longer length of time spent looking at the taller carrot showed that 3.5-month-old infants knew the existence, height, and direction of the carrot, and they had an expectation to see the tall carrot appear over the short screen. Baillargeon uses the term "violation of expectation paradigm" to account for the surprise which infants show by gazing longer at an impossible event. Baillargeon expresses contrasting ideas to those of her mentor Elizabeth Spelke. Although both Baillargeon and Spelke believe that children are born with some understanding of the world, Baillargeon claims that this understanding comes in the form of innate learning mechanisms while Spelke argues that infants are born with substantive knowledge regarding objects. Baillargeon claims that infants learn to reason about novel physical phenomena by forming an all or nothing concept, adding discrete and continuous variables that seem to affect the event, and lastly they reason qualitatively and quantitatively.

Criticisms Baillargeon's research on object permanence met criticism from Gregor Schoner and Esther Thelen. Schoner and Thelen argued that Baillargeon was overly extrapolating the results of her studies on infants' knowledge regarding object permanence. They believe that the violation of expectation paradigm merely signifies that infants notice a difference between the stimuli, such as more movement or different colors, as opposed to showing surprise at the sight of a seemingly impossible event. Despite these criticisms, Baillargeon's work continues to be influential in developmental psychology.

Major works Gelman, R.; Baillargeon, R. (1983). "A review of some Piagetian concepts". Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 3. pp. 167–230. Baillargeon, R.; Spelke, E. S.; Wasserman, S. (1985). "Object permanence in five-month-old infants". Cognition. 20 (3): 191–208. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90008-3. PMID 4064606. S2CID 204981310. Baillargeon, R (1987). "Object permanence in 3½-and 4½-month-old infants". Developmental Psychology. 23 (5): 655. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.655. Baillargeon, R.; Onishi, K. H. (2005). "Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs?". Science. 308 (5719): 225–258. Bibcode:2005Sci...308..255O. doi:10.1126/science.1107621. PMC 3357322. PMID 15821091. Baillargeon, R (2002). "The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy: A summary in eight lessons". Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. Vol. 1. pp. 46–83. Baillargeon, R.; Scott, R. M.; He, Z. (2010). "False-belief understanding in infants". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 14 (3): 110–118. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006. PMC 2930901. PMID 20106714.

Awards 1989: Boyd R. McCandless Young Scientist Award from the American Psychological Association. 1991: Guggenheim Fellow. 2007: Elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 2013: Fyssen Foundation International Prize for contributing vast knowledge on the theme "Human Cognitive Development." 2015: Elected to the National Academy of Sciences.

References

External links Faculty Biography, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Infant Cognition Lab

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Renée Baillargeon

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Renée Baillargeon claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Renée Baillargeon before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Renée Baillargeon ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Renée Baillargeon

In research
Renée Baillargeon appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Renée Baillargeon in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Renée Baillargeon is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1954 births, 21st-century American psychologists, 21st-century American women scientists, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Renée Baillargeon outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Renée Baillargeon” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Renée Baillargeon in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Renée Baillargeon means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Renée Baillargeon out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Renée Baillargeon in simple terms?

Renée Baillargeon (French: [ʁəne bajaʁʒɔ̃]; born 1954) is a Canadian American research psychologist. A distinguished professor of Psychology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Baillargeon specializes in the development of cognition in infancy.

Why does Renée Baillargeon matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Renée Baillargeon?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Renée Baillargeon.

Tags

  • 1954 births
  • 21st-century American psychologists
  • 21st-century American women scientists
  • 21st-century Canadian psychologists
  • American cognitive scientists
  • American developmental psychologists
  • American women academics
  • American women psychologists
  • Canadian expatriate academics in the United States
  • Canadian women psychologists
  • Cognitive development researchers
  • Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Keep exploring