Robotic non-destructive testing (NDT) is a method of inspection used to assess the structural integrity of petroleum, natural gas, and water installations. Crawler-based robotic tools are commonly used for in-line inspection (ILI) applications in pipelines that cannot be inspected using traditional intelligent pigging tools (or unpiggable pipelines). Robotic NDT tools can also be used for mandatory inspections in inhospitable areas (e.g., tank interiors, subsea petroleum installations) to minimize danger to human inspectors, as these tools are operated remotely by a trained technician or NDT analyst. These systems transmit data and commands via either a wire (typically called an umbilical cable or tether) or wirelessly (in the case of battery-powered tetherless crawlers).
Applications Robotic NDT tools help pipeline operators and utility companies complete required structural integrity data sets for maintenance purposes in the following applications:
Petroleum and public utility pipelines Pipe walls Girth welds Nuclear cooling systems Storage tanks Floor plates Shell plates Welds Pipeline conditions that may prevent or hinder a flow-driven pig inspection include:
Some pipe fittings (e.g., small-radius bends, tees, butterfly valves, reducers) may be impassable for bulky inspection pigs. Technicians can manually adjust robotic tool travel speed, orientation, and configuration to navigate fittings that might trap or damage a free-flowing pig. Product flow may not be conducive to pig travel. Technician control of self-propelled crawler travel reduces the risk of velocity-based sensor malfunction. Real-time tool monitoring allows the technician to adjust the tool run immediately if readings become unacceptable, including adjusting tool settings to re-scan missed areas or repairing damaged components. Most robotic tools employ non-contact examination methods – technicians are not forced to manage a layer of couplant. Limited tool access may impact use of traditional tools – smart pigs require special entry and exit points (called launchers and receivers, respectively), which may be permanently or temporarily installed. Some crawlers can be inserted via removed fittings or cut-out spools as small as 24” in length, providing greater flexibility in launch and retrieval options – these tools do not require special fixtures. Some crawlers are designed to enter and exit natural gas lines via hot taps, which can be placed at pipeline operator convenience without taking the line out of service. Even in pipelines that could feasibly accept a traditional smart pig, the ability of crawlers to perform short inspections inside specific areas of concern is much more efficient for pipeline operators than arranging a lengthy pig run just to reach the same small area. Robotic NDT tools also offer safety advantages in inhospitable areas:
Tank shell inspection crawlers typically climb the sides of the tanks, avoiding the danger to the inspectors and time/expense to the tank owner of providing fall protection or/and scaffolding. Similarly, tank floor inspection crawlers that can be lowered into the tank via portholes on the tank roof eliminate the hazards of confined space entry and the time/expense involved in air quality monitoring. Tools capable of working while submerged eliminate the hazards, difficulty, and expense of draining the inspection area. When used in storage tank inspections and subsea applications, these tools also eliminate hazards associated with diving.
Robotic ILI crawler variants
Tethered tool overview
Tethered robotic inspection tools have an umbilical cable attached to them, which provides power and control commands to the tool while relaying sensor data back to the technician. Tethered crawlers have the following advantages over untethered crawlers:
Technicians can use the tether to help retrieve the crawler in an emergency or to perform repairs Unlimited power supply from the umbilical cable allows technicians to examine potential defects as necessary without concern for battery life The umbilical cable supplies real-time control and sensor data to technicians, allowing re-inspection of questionable findings if necessary as well as alerting technicians immediately to tool malfunctions (i.e., minimizing false calls or/and missed anomalies) Most tethered ILI crawlers are small enough to be inserted via removed fittings/flanges or small cuts in a pipeline, minimizing inconvenience to the pipeline operator Bi-directional capabilities require only one access point for pipe inspections Tethered crawlers have the following disadvantages against untethered crawlers:
The length and weight of the umbilical cable limits the distance these tools can travel Pipelines and tanks typically must be taken out of service to accommodate ILI tool entry and travel
Untethered ILI crawler overview
Untethered robotic ILI crawlers are powered by onboard batteries; these tools transmit sensor data wirelessly to the tool operator or store the data for downloading upon tool retrieval. Untethered crawlers have the following advantages over tethered crawlers:
Untethered tools have a greater effective distance without the limitations imposed by an umbilical cable Pipelines can be sealed with untethered tools inside – the pipe can often remain in service during the inspection Bi-directional capabilities require only one access point for pipe inspections Untethered crawlers have the following disadvantages against tethered crawlers:
Untethered robotic ILI crawlers can get stuck, requiring excavation and pipe cutting to retrieve the tool Data-recording robotic ILI crawlers do not supply real time data to operators, which can require additional inspection runs to analyze possible findings Untethered robotic ILI crawlers typically require large launchers to deploy and retrieve
Inspection technologies Robotic NDT tools employ suites of inspection sensors. This section describes common sensor types; most tools combine several types of sensor depending on factors such as robot size, design, and application.
Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducers (EMAT) – milled steel Main article – Electromagnetic acoustic transducers
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.






