ArticleslgStudy

science

Shinichi Fujimura

Shinichi Fujimura is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Shinichi Fujimura rather than just read about it. In short: Shinichi Fujimura (藤村 新一, Fujimura Shin'ichi; b. May 4, 1950) is a Japanese amateur archaeologist who claimed he had found a large number of stone artifacts dating back to the Lower Paleolithic and Middle Paleolithic periods.

Key takeaways

  • Shinichi Fujimura belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Shinichi Fujimura to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Shinichi Fujimura from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Shinichi Fujimura (藤村 新一, Fujimura Shin'ichi; b. May 4, 1950) is a Japanese amateur archaeologist who claimed he had found a large number of stone artifacts dating back to the Lower Paleolithic and Middle Paleolithic periods. These objects were later revealed to be forgeries.

Success Fujimura was born in Kami, Miyagi, in 1950. After graduating from a high school in Sendai, he obtained a job in a manufacturing company. He became intrigued by archaeology when he was a child, finding shards of Jōmon pottery in the backyard of his house. In 1972 Fujimura began to study archaeology and to look for Paleolithic artifacts during his holidays. Within the few years to follow, he rose to fame among amateur and academic archaeologists in Sendai by which he was appointed the head of the NGO group, Sekki Bunka Kenkyukai (石器文化硏究会, literally translated to stone tool culture research association) in 1975. Fujimura discovered and excavated many Paleolithic stone artifacts in Miyagi prefecture, such as at Zazaragi site in 1981, Nakamine C site in 1983 and Babadan A site in 1984. From a cross-dating investigation of the stratum these stone tools were estimated to be about 50,000 years old. He established his reputation as a leading amateur archaeologist because he found most of the artifacts on his own. He even became known as the archaeologist with the "divine hands". After this success, he participated in 180 archaeological digs in northern Japan and almost always found artifacts, of increasing age. Based on his discoveries the history of the Japanese Paleolithic period was extended to about 300,000 years. Most of the archaeologists did not question Fujimura's work and this discovery was written in the history textbooks. Later he gained a position as a deputy director at the private NGO group Tohoku Paleolithic Institute.

Criticism Despite the acquiescence from the archeologists, some geologists and anthropologists claimed the discovery was dubious and lacked consistency with the geologic analysis of the sites. Takeoka Toshiki at the Kyoritsu Joshi University published an article

Stone artifacts which were recently discovered at Japanese Upper Paleolithic sites, such as Kamitakamori site are so different from the characteristics of these Upper Paleolithic stones. ... Those are the same as the stone shafts of the Jōmon period in their shape or fabrication method. ... This site and their archaeological finds are undoubtedly abnormal, a kind of OOPARTs. Shizuo Oda and Charles T. Keally also mentioned some peculiarities in their article

After talking to the principal investigators, Okamura and Kamata, and a thorough study of the relevant publications and the lithics themselves, we have concluded that no proven artifacts of human origin predating 30,000 B. P. exist in Miyagi prefecture. The claims of Okamura, Kamata, and some other Miyagi archaeologists that they have discovered a "Lower Palaeolithic" are based on flawed research and are dubious claims.

Disclosure On October 23, 2000, Fujimura and his team announced another finding at the Kamitakamori ruins near Tsukidate in Miyagi Prefecfure. Fujimura claimed to have found the postholes of an early Paleolithic period dwelling, which would have been the nation's oldest, between 600,000 and 120,000 years old. On November 5, 2000, the newspaper Mainichi Shimbun published pictures of Fujimura digging holes and burying 61 objects at Kamitakamori, which he and his team later unearthed. The pictures had been taken one day before his Kamitakamori discovery was announced. Fujimura confessed and apologized the same day in a press conference, saying that he had been "possessed by an uncontrollable urge". At first, Fujimura denied his previous discoveries were faked. In 2001 the Japanese Archaeological Association reviewed all of Fujimura's "discoveries" and concluded that he'd planted artifacts at 42 excavation sites. The following year, the association formally concluded that none of the objects supposedly found by Fujimura were correctly dated, finding that some bore marks from metal implements, and that some were just stones. Fujimura was expelled from both the Japanese Archaeological Association and the Tōhuku Paleolithic Institute, whose chairman resigned as a result of the scandal.

See also Japanese Paleolithic hoax Piltdown Man Beringer's Lying Stones Semir Osmanagić

References

Romey, Kristin M. (January–February 2001). ""God's Hands" Did the Devil's Work". Archeology. 54 (1). Retrieved 4 February 2013. Normile, Dennis (5 January 2001). "Japanese Fraud Highlights Media-Driven Research Ethic". Science. 291 (5501): 34–55. doi:10.1126/science.291.5501.34. PMID 11192001. S2CID 145381747. "Structural Failure". Science. 290 (5494): 1083b–. 2000. doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1083b. S2CID 263335837. "Further fakes". Science. 294 (5540): 31c–31. 5 October 2001. doi:10.1126/science.294.5540.31c. S2CID 220099684. Normile, Dennis (November 2001). "Questions Arise Over Second Japanese Sit". Science. 294 (5547): 1634. doi:10.1126/science.294.5547.1634a. PMID 11721025. S2CID 96471398. Feder, Kenneth L. (2008). Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-340529-2.

External links Japanese Archeology, Web page by C. T. Keally 前・中期旧石器問題関連文書総覧, 日本考古学協会

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Shinichi Fujimura

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Shinichi Fujimura claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Shinichi Fujimura before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Shinichi Fujimura ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Shinichi Fujimura

In research
Shinichi Fujimura appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Shinichi Fujimura in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Shinichi Fujimura is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1950 births, Archaeological forgery, Hoaxes in Japan, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Shinichi Fujimura outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Shinichi Fujimura in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Shinichi Fujimura means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Shinichi Fujimura out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Shinichi Fujimura in simple terms?

Shinichi Fujimura (藤村 新一, Fujimura Shin'ichi; b. May 4, 1950) is a Japanese amateur archaeologist who claimed he had found a large number of stone artifacts dating back to the Lower Paleolithic and Middle Paleolithic periods.

Why does Shinichi Fujimura matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Shinichi Fujimura?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Shinichi Fujimura.

Tags

  • 1950 births
  • Archaeological forgery
  • Hoaxes in Japan
  • Living people
  • Paleolithic Japan
  • People involved in scientific misconduct incidents

Keep exploring