Social choreography describes how people move, interact, and relate to one another in social space. It is a term used across performance studies, dance theory, sociology, and artistic practice to better understand how movement, bodily relations, spatial organization, and collective behavior structure and transform social life. The term has evolved across several overlapping but distinct lineages. These include theoretical work written by Andrew Hewitt, who examined choreography as a means through which ideology and social order are embodied in everyday movement. In parallel, a practice-based approach has been developed by choreographer Michael Kliën, dramaturg Steve Valk, writer Jeffrey Gormly, and collaborators. Other scholars and theorists, including Bojana Cvejić, Ana Vujanović, Gabriele Klein, Randy Martin have used the term in relation to public space, protest, collective embodiment, and political participation. Although these approaches share concerns, they differ substantially in emphasis and method. From a practitioner perspective, the term spans a range of dance-adjacent, community-engaged, and participatory practices, each of which retain distinct theoretical orientations.
Definitions and uses
In practice-based contexts, social choreography refers to choreographic approaches that organize conditions for collective interaction beyond conventional dance performance. Drawing on Gregory Bateson's systems theory and cybernetic epistemology, Michael Kliën describes choreography as "the workings and governance of patterns, dynamics, and ecologies," and the practice of "setting relations or the conditions for relations to emerge." Bateson's cybernetic and ecological thought, including his arguments in Steps to an Ecology of Mind (1972) and Mind and Nature (1979) describes the mind as distributed across relational systems rather than located in individuals, showing how the observer is always entangled with the system under inquiry. Social choreography is thus an applied aesthetic practice operating within social and institutional environments. It can be distinguished from social engineering by virtue of its creative and non-deterministic qualities rather than a managerial one. Other scholarly uses of the term emphasize choreography as an analytical framework. Andrew Hewitt's Social Choreography (2005) examines choreography as a means through which ideology is embodied in everyday life and social order historically rehearsed. Scholars who contributed to TkH / Walking Theory, including Bojana Cvejić, Ana Vujanović, and Gabriele Klein, have examined social choreography in relation to protest movements, public assembly, participation, and collective behavior.
Practice-based development The practice-based lineage developed through projects including Daghdha Dance Company in Limerick, Ireland, where Michael Kliën served as artistic director and Steve Valk as resident dramaturge between 2003 and 2011. In 2005, they initiated Framemakers, a public think tank bringing together artists, scholars, ecologists, theologians, and writers in dialogue with choreographic practice, whose aim was to "embody and foster a new understanding of choreography as the creative act of setting humans, actions, ideas and thoughts in relation to one another." Bradford Keeney's Aesthetics of Change (1983), which describes minds as "conversational patterns" and bodies as "the participants in the conversation," was foundational to this group's understanding of embodiment and collective knowledge. The project was documented in Framemakers: Choreography as an Aesthetics of Change (2005) and later expanded through Book of Recommendations: Choreography as an Aesthetics of Change (2008). The Framemakers booklet has been cited as an early formal articulation of social choreography's conceptual framework. The lineage has also been associated with experimental environments connected to Ballett Frankfurt under William Forsythe, where Valk worked as head dramaturge and creative collaborator from 1992 to 2004. Forsythe's work explored choreography beyond theatrical dance performance and into participatory and public environments. His "Choreographic Objects" are examples of installations and environments designed to extend choreographic explorations beyond the stage to public spaces and the layperson. Among these, Tight Roaring Circle / White Bouncy Castle (1997) was an example of a choreographic environment in which "there are no spectators, only participants." Between 2000 and 2003, Valk collaborated with Forsythe, artist Heiner Blum, and students from the Hochschule für Gestaltung Offenbach (HfG) on Schmalclub, a regular event series at the Bockenheimer Depot in Frankfurt, which was characterized as "neither theater, party, exhibition, event, nor performance, but 'a piece of life.'" In Expanded Choreographies - Choreographic Histories (2022), Anna Leon situates Forsythe's choreographic objects within a broader transhistorical account of choreography exceeding dancing human bodies, to which the practice-based lineage of social choreography belongs. Subsequent institutional developments initiated by the practice-based lineage include the Institute for Social Choreography in Frankfurt (2012), the Ricean School of Dance in Hydra, Greece (2014–2017), and the Laboratory for Social Choreography at Duke University, established in 2020 at the Kenan Institute for Ethics.
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
