ArticleslgStudy

science

Sonic philosophy

Sonic philosophy is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Sonic philosophy rather than just read about it. In short: Sonic philosophy or the philosophy of sound is a philosophical theory that proposes thinking sonically instead of thinking about sound. It is applied in ontology or the investigation of being and the determination of what exists.

Sonic philosophy — main illustration
Sonic philosophy — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Sonic philosophy belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Sonic philosophy to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Sonic philosophy from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Sonic philosophy or the philosophy of sound is a philosophical theory that proposes thinking sonically instead of thinking about sound. It is applied in ontology or the investigation of being and the determination of what exists. The materialist sonic philosophy is also considered part of aesthetic philosophy and traces the effect of sound on philosophy and draws from the notion that sound is a flux, event, and effect.

Background

Scholars cite the role of the naturalistic philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer in the development of sonic philosophy. Both maintained that music and sound directly figure the world as it is in itself and that they serve as the primary forces and movements behind all natural change, tension, creation, and destruction. The latter's notion of music considers it as a direct expression of the will. In his early unpublished writings, Nietzsche wrote that the concept of the philosopher involves his attempts "to let all sounds of the world reverberate in him and to place this comprehensive sound outside himself into concepts". These thinkers' positions underscored the philosophical importance of sound as they articulate the presentation of an ontology that unsettles the ordinary conception of things. This ontology allows the investigation of being and the determination of what things exist. Modern sound philosophy also emerged out of philosophical aesthetics as scholars address the question of whether sounds and sounding artworks can be treated in the same way as other arts (e.g. visual arts) are approached. Sonic philosophy is considered in opposition to the Kantian philosophy of humanism since it challenges the suggestion that the world is only "for-us" and mediated by discourse. A modern conceptualization articulated the philosophy as based on the idea that sound is a flux, event, and effect. It is also part of a contemporary project that rejects the essentialist and phenomenological approach to sonic theory.

Sonic event

An element in the materialist philosophy of sound is the so-called sonic or acoustic event. In this conceptualization of sound, the event – beginning from a source and arriving at multiple locations – is always considered a public event, filling both ears and space. As an experience it shows that: 1) space is more than a conceptualization of materiality; 2) knowledge constitutes several voices; 3) circulation is affective and productive.

Flux For thinkers such as John Cage and Max Neuhaus, sound and music are thought of as anonymous flux that is beyond the human contributions to it. According to Manuel De Landa, this particular notion of sound as a flux is critical in the conceptualization of all of nature and culture as a collection of flows that are captured and released through different isomorphic processes.

Philosophies Christoph Cox proposed a modern conceptualization of sonic philosophy that drew from the works of Nietzsche and Gilles Deleuze. Citing the lack of theories on sound art, he developed a materialist sonic philosophy that approached theorizing aesthetics by beginning with sound. Cox maintained that this method upsets the ontology of "objects" and "beings" and underscores the materiality of sound. He stated: If we proceed from sound, we will be less inclined to think in terms of representation and signification, and to draw distinctions between culture and nature, human and nonhuman, mind and matter, the symbolic and the real, the textual and the physical, the meaningful and the meaningless. Instead, we might begin to treat artistic productions, not as complexes of signs or representations but complexes of forces materially inflected by other forces and force-complexes. Thinkers who also developed their own sonic philosophy include Christof Migone who placed sound art within disparate and paradoxical contexts to address the sound's "physical diffuseness". In his work called Sonic Somatic: Performances of the Unsound Body, he also explored how sound shaped and disrupted the way art shifted from subject to object through to the abject. The work of Jing Wang cited Chinese philosophical concepts associated with sound such as resonance, shan shui, huanghu, and distributive monumentality as he explored the meaning and function of sound and expanded on the notion that "Chinese acoustics is acoustics of qi". Sonic philosophy also underpinned a tactic called sonic warfare. It holds that, while sound is merely a vibration audible to humans and animals, it entails the perceptions of a human subject. In battle, sonic philosophy serves as a sonic intervention into thought, deploying concepts that are identified with sound, noise, music culture. These are then inserted into the weak spots of the history, philosophy, and psyche of the enemy.

References

See also Philosophy of music

Illustrations

Sonic philosophy: Friedrich Nietzsche
Friedrich Nietzsche
Sonic philosophy: Sound as illustrated in this auditorium is said to be always a public event.
Sound as illustrated in this auditorium is said to be always a public event.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Sonic philosophy

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Sonic philosophy claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Sonic philosophy before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Sonic philosophy ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Sonic philosophy

In research
Sonic philosophy appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Sonic philosophy in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Sonic philosophy is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Acoustics, Applied aesthetics, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Sonic philosophy outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Sonic philosophy” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Sonic philosophy in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Sonic philosophy means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Sonic philosophy out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Sonic philosophy in simple terms?

Sonic philosophy or the philosophy of sound is a philosophical theory that proposes thinking sonically instead of thinking about sound. It is applied in ontology or the investigation of being and the determination of what exists.

Why does Sonic philosophy matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Sonic philosophy?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Sonic philosophy.

Tags

  • Acoustics
  • Applied aesthetics

Keep exploring