ArticleslgStudy

science

Space Shuttle Challenger disaster

Space Shuttle Challenger disaster is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Space Shuttle Challenger disaster rather than just read about it. In short: On January 28, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, killing all seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated about 46,000 feet (14 km) above the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 16:39:13 UTC (11:39:13 a.m.

Space Shuttle Challenger disaster — main illustration
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Space Shuttle Challenger disaster belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Space Shuttle Challenger disaster to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Space Shuttle Challenger disaster from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

On January 28, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, killing all seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated about 46,000 feet (14 km) above the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 16:39:13 UTC (11:39:13 a.m. EST, local time at the launch site). It was the first fatal accident involving an American spacecraft while in flight. The mission, designated STS-51-L, was the 10th flight for the orbiter and the 25th flight of the NASA's Space Shuttle program. The crew was scheduled to deploy a commercial communications satellite and study Halley's Comet while they were in orbit, in addition to taking schoolteacher Christa McAuliffe into space under the Teacher in Space Project. This latter task resulted in a higher-than-usual media interest in and coverage of the mission, and the launch and subsequent disaster were seen live in many schools across the United States. The cause of the disaster was the failure of the primary and secondary O-ring seals in a joint in the right Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster (SRB). The record-low temperatures on the morning of the launch had stiffened the rubber O-rings, reducing their ability to seal the joints. Shortly after liftoff the seals were breached, and hot pressurized gas from within the SRB leaked through the joint and burned through the aft attachment strut connecting it to the external propellant tank (ET), then into the tank itself. The collapse of the ET's internal structures and the rotation of the SRB that followed propelled the shuttle stack, traveling at a speed of Mach 1.92, into a direction that allowed aerodynamic forces to tear the orbiter apart. Both SRBs detached from the now-destroyed ET and continued to fly uncontrollably until the range safety officer (RSO) sent a signal to destroy them. The crew compartment containing human remains, and many other fragments from the shuttle, were recovered from the ocean floor after a three-month search and recovery operation. The exact timing of the deaths of the crew is not known, but several crew members are thought to have survived the initial breakup of the spacecraft. The orbiter had no escape system, and the impact of the crew compartment at terminal velocity with the ocean surface was too violent to be survivable. The disaster resulted in a 32-month hiatus in the Space Shuttle program. President Ronald Reagan created the Rogers Commission to investigate the accident. The commission criticized NASA's organizational culture and decision-making processes that had contributed to the accident. Test data since 1977 had demonstrated a potentially catastrophic flaw in the SRBs' O-rings, but neither NASA nor SRB manufacturer Morton Thiokol had addressed this known defect. NASA managers also disregarded engineers' warnings about the dangers of launching in low temperatures and did not report these technical concerns to their superiors. As a result of this disaster, NASA established the Office of Safety, Reliability, and Quality Assurance, and arranged for deployment of commercial satellites from expendable launch vehicles, rather than from a crewed orbiter. The construction of a new Space Shuttle orbiter, Endeavour, was approved in 1987 to replace Challenger, and the new orbiter first flew in 1992. Subsequent missions were launched with redesigned SRBs and their crews wore pressurized suits during ascent and reentry. In February 2003 the Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated during re-entry. The Columbia Accident Investigation Board concluded that NASA had failed to learn lessons from the Challenger disaster, which resulted in the second disaster.

Background

Space Shuttle

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Space Shuttle Challenger disaster illustration
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster: Space Shuttle Challenger – assembled for launch along with the ET and two SRBs – atop a crawler-transporter en route to the launch pad about one month before the disaster
Space Shuttle Challenger – assembled for launch along with the ET and two SRBs – atop a crawler-transporter en route to the launch pad about one month before the disaster
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster: Cross-sectional diagram of the original SRB field joint. The top end of the lower rocket segment has a deep U-shaped cavity, or clevis, along its circumference. The bottom end of the top segment extends to form a tang that fits snugly into the clevis of the bottom segment. Two parallel grooves near the top of the clevis inner branch hold ~20 foot (6 meter) diameter O-rings that seal the gap between the tang and the clevis, keeping hot gases out of the gap.
Cross-sectional diagram of the original SRB field joint. The top end of the lower rocket segment has a deep U-shaped cavity, or clevis, along its circumference. The bottom end of the top segment extends to form a tang that fits snugly into the clevis of the bottom segment. Two parallel grooves near the top of the clevis inner branch hold ~20 foot (6 meter) diameter O-rings that seal the gap between the tang and the clevis, keeping hot gases out of the gap.
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster: STS-51-L crew: (back) Onizuka, McAuliffe, Jarvis, Resnik;

(front) Smith, Scobee, McNair.[9]
STS-51-L crew: (back) Onizuka, McAuliffe, Jarvis, Resnik; (front) Smith, Scobee, McNair.[9]
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster: Ice on the launch tower hours before Challenger launch
Ice on the launch tower hours before Challenger launch

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Space Shuttle Challenger disaster

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Space Shuttle Challenger disaster claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Space Shuttle Challenger disaster before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Space Shuttle Challenger disaster ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Space Shuttle Challenger disaster

In research
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Space Shuttle Challenger disaster in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Space Shuttle Challenger disaster is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1986 disasters in the United States, 1986 explosions, 1986 in Florida, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Space Shuttle Challenger disaster outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Space Shuttle Challenger disaster” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Space Shuttle Challenger disaster in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Space Shuttle Challenger disaster means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Space Shuttle Challenger disaster out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Space Shuttle Challenger disaster in simple terms?

On January 28, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, killing all seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated about 46,000 feet (14 km) above the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 16:39:13 UTC (11:39:13 a.m.

Why does Space Shuttle Challenger disaster matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Space Shuttle Challenger disaster?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Space Shuttle Challenger disaster.

Tags

  • 1986 disasters in the United States
  • 1986 explosions
  • 1986 in Florida
  • 1986 in spaceflight
  • 1986 industrial disasters
  • Accidental deaths in Florida
  • Aviation accidents and incidents in the United States in 1986
  • Destroyed spacecraft
  • Disasters in Florida
  • Filmed deaths in the United States
  • History of Brevard County, Florida
  • January 1986 in the United States

Keep exploring