The Spearman–Brown prediction formula, also known as the Spearman–Brown prophecy formula, is a formula relating psychometric reliability to test length and used by psychometricians to predict the reliability of a test after changing the test length. It is also vital to the "step-up" phase of split-half and related methods of estimating reliability. The method was published independently by Spearman (1910) and Brown (1910).
Calculation Predicted reliability, ρ x x ′ ∗ {\displaystyle {\rho }_{xx'}^{*}} , is estimated as:
ρ x x ′ ∗ = n ρ x x ′ 1 + ( n − 1 ) ρ x x ′ {\displaystyle {\rho }_{xx'}^{*}={\frac {n{\rho }_{xx'}}{1+(n-1){\rho }_{xx'}}}}
where n is the number of "tests" combined (see below) and ρ x x ′ {\displaystyle {\rho }_{xx'}} is the reliability of the current "test". The formula predicts the reliability of a new test composed by replicating the current test n times (or, equivalently, creating a test with n parallel forms of the current exam). If an 80-item test is reduced to a comparable set of 50 items, then n = 50/80 = 0.625. Thus n = 2 implies doubling the exam length by adding items with the same properties as those in the current exam. Values of n less than one may be used to predict the effect of shortening a test (e.g., n = 0.5 implies halving the test length).
Forecasting test length The formula can also be rearranged to predict the number of replications required to achieve a degree of reliability:
n = ρ x x ′ ∗ ( 1 − ρ x x ′ ) ρ x x ′ ( 1 − ρ x x ′ ∗ ) {\displaystyle n={\frac {{\rho }_{xx'}^{*}(1-{\rho }_{xx'})}{{\rho }_{xx'}(1-{\rho }_{xx'}^{*})}}}
For example, if a 50-item test has reliability ρ x x ′ = 0.80 {\displaystyle {\rho }_{xx'}=0.80} , then what test length is required for a reliability of ρ x x ′ ∗ = 0.95 {\displaystyle {\rho }_{xx'}^{*}=0.95} ? n = 4.75, 4.75 * 50 = 237.5, so a test of about 238 comparable items is needed to achieve a reliability of 0.95.
Use and related topics This formula is commonly used by psychometricians to predict the reliability of a test after changing the test length. This relationship is particularly vital to the split-half and related methods of estimating reliability (where this method is sometimes known as the "Step Up" formula). The formula is also helpful in understanding the nonlinear relationship between test reliability and test length. Test length must grow by increasingly larger values as the desired reliability approaches 1.0. If the longer/shorter test is not parallel to the current test, then the prediction will not be strictly accurate. For example, if a highly reliable test was lengthened by adding many poor items then the achieved reliability will probably be much lower than that predicted by this formula. For the reliability of a two-item test, the formula is more appropriate than Cronbach's alpha (used in this way, the Spearman-Brown formula is also called "standardized Cronbach's alpha", as it is the same as Cronbach's alpha computed using the average item intercorrelation and unit-item variance, rather than the average item covariance and average item variance).
Relation to split-half reliability coefficients
Split-half reliability Until the development of Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability using the Spearman-Brown formula was the only way to obtain inter-item reliability. After splitting the whole exam into arbitrary halves, the correlation between the split-halves can be converted into reliability by applying the Spearman-Brown formula. That is,
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.
