ArticleslgStudy

science

Switching noise jitter

Switching noise jitter is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Switching noise jitter rather than just read about it. In short: Switching Noise Jitter (SNJ) is the aggregation of variability of noise events in the time-domain on the supply bias of an electronic system, in particular with a voltage regulated supply bias incorporated with closed-loop (feedback) control, for instance, SMPS. SNJ is measurable using real-time spectral histogram analysis and expressed as a rate of occurrence in percentage.

Switching noise jitter — main illustration
Switching noise jitter — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Switching noise jitter belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Switching noise jitter to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Switching noise jitter from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

Switching Noise Jitter (SNJ) is the aggregation of variability of noise events in the time-domain on the supply bias of an electronic system, in particular with a voltage regulated supply bias incorporated with closed-loop (feedback) control, for instance, SMPS. SNJ is measurable using real-time spectral histogram analysis and expressed as a rate of occurrence in percentage. The existence of SNJ was firstly demonstrated and termed by TransSiP Inc in 2016 and 2017 at the Applied Power Electronics Conference (APEC), and reviewed with experts at Tektronix prior to be featured as a case study published by Tektronix. The discovery of SNJ was also featured in multiple articles published by Planet Analog magazine and EDN Network. Difficult to filter using conventional LC networks due to variability in both time and frequency domains, SNJ can introduce random errors in analog to digital conversion, affecting both data integrity and system performance in digital communications and location-based services (viz GPS, Satellite positioning)

Creation In switching-mode power supplies (SMPS), noise present in the control loop circuitry of the supply causes dislocation in up-slope and down-slope timing of the saw-tooth ripple waveform. As a consequence, the ripple waveform exhibits jitter and noise carried on the ripple also jitters. When this type of supply bias is used to power a system operating in power-saving modes or pulsed applications as shown in Fig. 1 the current drain fluctuates in pulses. Typically a load enters a high power stage (e.g. RX/TX On) for tens of micro- to milli-seconds and is then switched to low power or standby mode for hundreds of milli- or tens of seconds. Inrush currents cause voltage fluctuations due to parasitics of both components and interconnections, creating random noise in addition to the ringing and harmonics normally present. The result is SNJ.

Associated issues At present, many modern switching DC-DC converters offer dual-mode operation. At full load, the switching frequency is held constant and the voltage is modulated by varying pulse width (pulse-width modulation or PWM), thereby presenting a fixed frequency to the filter circuitry. When light loads are present, PWM efficiencies degrade, so the converter switches to modulation of pulse frequency, typically referred to as pulse-frequency mode (PFM) for increased efficiency. Nevertheless, the dual-mode approach has multiple disadvantages: it creates additional transient noise and momentary fluctuations in output voltage, as well as reduced energy efficiency due to the increased quiescent current required by complex mode-switching circuitry. To make things more difficult, the PFM mode creates a wide spectrum of noise as well as SNJ in the time domain at the output voltage that is difficult to filter. The SNJ signature, therefore, becomes a dominating influence on the performance of noise-sensitive SoCs, circuit components and fidelity of weak signals after the ripple voltage has been suppressed. In addition, SNJ has a cumulative effect in the analog to digital conversion found in modern digital communications due to the existence of a variety of unwanted noise signals over time which will be digitized and stored in memory.

Time vs. frequency domain

Noise in the output of DC-DC converters may be random or periodic fluctuations in output voltage, analytically expressed as peak-to-peak voltage or noise spectral density. Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 demonstrate the typical visual characteristics of the output from a switching regulator and a linear regulator (also known as "low dropout" or "LDO") respectively. A saw-tooth ripple waveform is the consequence of LC filtering on the output of a switching regulator, while the output of the LDO in this example clearly shows transient/spurious events due to circuit parasitics. These are accompanied by more macro fluctuations in a pulse application due to overshoots and undershoots. Fig. 4 compares the supply bias noise (ripple) in a GPS application as measured by a spectrum analyzer. The primary bias voltage is provided respectively by a LDO and by a switching regulator. The frequency range of the noise spectrum for both is very similar, lying below 1 MHz. However, the noise amplitude of the LDO is about 20 dB lower than the switching regulator. So in general practice, the primary bias voltage provided by the LDO is expected to perform better and is generally used as the golden reference when specifying performance characteristics of an active device such as a GPS or wireless communication module or IC, notwithstanding the relatively low DC-DC conversion efficiencies of linear regulators.

The LDO is indeed able to provide a low-noise bias, but only when the DC load is constant. Of course, in practice the current draw of a load will fluctuate, and careful examinations of the supply bias of pulsed applications will show that transient noise is, in fact, present, as shown in Fig. 5 and this is difficult to filter. Powering a noise-sensitive SoC or circuit component in a pulsed application with an LDO may well turn out to be a sub-optimal solution: in addition to low conversion efficiency, noise is still present on the supply bias in the form of transients which vary in both frequency and density (frequency of occurrence). When observed on an oscilloscope, the ripple waveform on the output of a PFM-type DC-DC converter will appear as shown in Fig. 6. Abnormalities occurring in the time-domain increase the "perturbation": the variability of switching events in time relative to a reference. Since the converter is PFM type, the switching frequency changes with the fluctuation of the load. This makes it problematic using frequency-domain measurement to discriminate how much of the variation of the waveform in both timing TON and slope S1 (∆V/∆T) is caused by the response of the controller to the load and how much by the noise in the control loop circuitry. The waveform in Fig. 7 demonstrates the outcome from the same setup with SNJ conditioning in place: the variability in TON and S1are substantially reduced.

Measurement

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Switching noise jitter: Fig. 1 Current draw profile of load utilizing power saving modes (i.e. Pulsed Applications)
Fig. 1 Current draw profile of load utilizing power saving modes (i.e. Pulsed Applications)
Switching noise jitter: Fig 2.  Typical Output Noise Waveform from a Switching Regulator
Fig 2. Typical Output Noise Waveform from a Switching Regulator
Switching noise jitter: Fig 3 Typical Output Noise from a Linear Regulator
Fig 3 Typical Output Noise from a Linear Regulator
Switching noise jitter: Fig. 4 Supply Bias Noise (ripple) in a GPS application as measured by a spectrum analyzer.
Fig. 4 Supply Bias Noise (ripple) in a GPS application as measured by a spectrum analyzer.
Switching noise jitter: FIG. 5 Transient Noise Present with LDO in Pulsed Applications
FIG. 5 Transient Noise Present with LDO in Pulsed Applications

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Switching noise jitter

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Switching noise jitter claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Switching noise jitter before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Switching noise jitter ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Switching noise jitter

In research
Switching noise jitter appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Switching noise jitter in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Switching noise jitter is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Noise (electronics), so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Switching noise jitter outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Switching noise jitter” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Switching noise jitter in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Switching noise jitter means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Switching noise jitter out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Switching noise jitter in simple terms?

Switching Noise Jitter (SNJ) is the aggregation of variability of noise events in the time-domain on the supply bias of an electronic system, in particular with a voltage regulated supply bias incorporated with closed-loop (feedback) control, for instance, SMPS. SNJ is measurable using real-time sp…

Why does Switching noise jitter matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Switching noise jitter?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Switching noise jitter.

Tags

  • Noise (electronics)

Keep exploring