ArticleslgStudy

science

Taxonomy of Allosaurus

Taxonomy of Allosaurus is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand Taxonomy of Allosaurus rather than just read about it. In short: The dinosaur genus Allosaurus has a complex taxonomic history, including multiple proposed species of which only a few are considered valid today. The genus was first described in 1877 by Othniel Charles Marsh from a very fragmentary specimen found in Colorado.

Taxonomy of Allosaurus — main illustration
Taxonomy of Allosaurus — illustration

Key takeaways

  • Taxonomy of Allosaurus belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect Taxonomy of Allosaurus to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of Taxonomy of Allosaurus from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The dinosaur genus Allosaurus has a complex taxonomic history, including multiple proposed species of which only a few are considered valid today. The genus was first described in 1877 by Othniel Charles Marsh from a very fragmentary specimen found in Colorado. For several decades, Allosaurus was known under the name Antrodemus, until a 1976 publication re-established the name Allosaurus. In 2023, another, much more complete specimen found in the same quarry was selected as the neotype (the specimen on which the taxon is based, replacing the inadequate original specimen). Four species are considered potentially valid. Besides the well-known type species A. fragilis, these are A. europaeus, A. jimmadseni, and A. anax. A. europaeus, based on a specimen from Portugal, is the only species found outside of North America. Its validity is contested, and some researchers found it to be a synonym of A. fragilis. A. jimmadseni was described in 2020 and is known from multiple complete specimens. A. anax was described in 2024 based on a few bones that were previously assigned to the genus Saurophaganax. Several other species are no longer accepted, and several other genera, such as Epanterias, Creosaurus, and Labrosaurus, have been considered as synonyms of Allosaurus. Fossils from Tanzania, Siberia, and Australia have been previously assigned but are no longer thought to belong to this genus.

The genus Allosaurus

Allosaurus is among the best-known dinosaurs, both scientifically and in public perception. It is the most common theropod in the Morrison Formation, an important fossil deposit in the Western US, accounting for 70 to 75% of theropod specimens. Additional specimens have been discovered in Portugal. Besides the type species, A. fragilis, several additional species have been proposed, three of which are currently in use. Most specimens are not yet assigned to any particular species. Allosaurus was discovered during the Bone Wars, a feud between the two paleontologists Othniel Charles Marsh and Edward Drinker Cope that led to a surge of fossil discoveries in the Western US. Marsh coined the name Allosaurus fragilis in 1877 for a fragmentary specimen (the holotype specimen; the specimen on which the species was based). According to Marsh, this specimen includes a lumbar vertebra, later identified as a middle dorsal vertebra (back vertebra); a tail vertebra; and "feet bones", later identified as the proximal phalanx (finger bone) of digit III of the right foot. James Henry Madsen, in his 1976 monograph "Allosaurus Fragilis: A Revised Osteology", noted that a tooth and a humerus (upper arm bone) fragment are part of the same specimen. These fossils are part of the collection of the Peabody Museum of Natural History and have the specimen number YPM 1930. The genus name Allosaurus comes from the Greek words allos/αλλος, meaning 'strange' or 'different', and sauros/σαυρος, meaning 'lizard' or 'reptile'. Marsh chose the name 'different lizard' because he believed that the vertebrae were different from those of other dinosaurs due to the deep concavities in their sides, giving them a lightweight construction. More complete specimens have later shown that these concavities were in fact internal chambers that were exposed due to damage of the bone. The bones were collected in 1877 from the Morrison Formation by Marshall Felch in what is now known as Felch Quarry, in the Garden Park area, Colorado.

In a 1920 monograph, Charles W. Gilmore published the first comprehensive description of Allosaurus, mostly based on the much more complete specimen USNM 4734. This specimen includes a skeleton with skull that Felch had discovered in the same quarry in which he already found the holotype. However, Gilmore used the name Antrodemus valens instead of Allosaurus fragilis, an older name that was based on a single vertebra of uncertain origin, and which he thought had priority. Antrodemus then became the accepted name for the animal for more than 50 years, until Madsen published his 1976 monograph in which he returned to Marsh's name. Madsen's account was based on immense amounts of material from Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry as well as DINO 2560, a well-preserved skeleton from Dinosaur National Monument.

Neotype designation and diagnosis

The holotype specimen of Allosaurus fragilis is too fragmentary to distinguish it from related genera and therefore not diagnostic, and the same is true of the holotype of Antrodemus valens, which consists of a part of a tail vertebra. Therefore, Madsen designated DINO 2560 as the neotype (replacement) specimen in his 1976 monograph, but this was not recognized because such a designation requires a formal ruling by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). In 2010, Gregory S. Paul and Kenneth Carpenter argued that the younger age and the proportionally longer skull of this specimen suggest that it might belong to a taxon other than A. fragilis. Paul and Carpenter instead argued that USNM 4734 should become the neotype, and submitted a formal case to the ICZN to have the name A. fragilis officially transferred to this specimen in order to warrant stability of the genus. They argued that USNM 4734 is the ideal replacement specimen because it is from the same quarry as the holotype and therefore probably of the same species. The proposal has subsequently been supported by other comments and was ratified by the ICZN on December 29, 2023. The exact set of anatomical features used to distinguish Allosaurus from other genera varies between studies. Among the commonly cited features is the large horn that is formed by the lacrimal bone and is situated above and in front of the eye. The lower jaw contains a bone known as the antarticular, which newly evolved in Allosaurus and is not found in other genera. The paroccipital processes (a pair of bony struts that extend backwards and sidewards from the braincase at the back of the skull) are extending ventrally (downwards) beyond the level of the basal tubera (tubercle-like extensions on the underside of the braincase). Another distinguishing feature is found in the pelvis, where the lower end of the ischium is suboval in side view.

… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.

Illustrations

Taxonomy of Allosaurus: The neotype specimen of Allosaurus fragilis, USNM 4734
The neotype specimen of Allosaurus fragilis, USNM 4734
Taxonomy of Allosaurus: Casts of the holotype of Allosaurus fragilis, YPM 1930, including a foot bone (1) and parts of two vertebrae (2 and 3)
Casts of the holotype of Allosaurus fragilis, YPM 1930, including a foot bone (1) and parts of two vertebrae (2 and 3)
Taxonomy of Allosaurus illustration
Taxonomy of Allosaurus illustration
Taxonomy of Allosaurus: Skull of DINO 2560 at Dinosaur National Monument, which James Madsen suggested as the neotype (specimen that defines the species) of Allosaurus fragilis in 1976. This was not accepted, and the specimen USNM 4734 was instead designated as the neotype.
Skull of DINO 2560 at Dinosaur National Monument, which James Madsen suggested as the neotype (specimen that defines the species) of Allosaurus fragilis in 1976. This was not accepted, and the specimen USNM 4734 was instead designated as the neotype.

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with Taxonomy of Allosaurus

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what Taxonomy of Allosaurus claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to Taxonomy of Allosaurus before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about Taxonomy of Allosaurus ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of Taxonomy of Allosaurus

In research
Taxonomy of Allosaurus appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses Taxonomy of Allosaurus in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
Taxonomy of Allosaurus is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics Carnosauria, Reptile taxonomy, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for Taxonomy of Allosaurus outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “Taxonomy of Allosaurus” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study Taxonomy of Allosaurus in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what Taxonomy of Allosaurus means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain Taxonomy of Allosaurus out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is Taxonomy of Allosaurus in simple terms?

The dinosaur genus Allosaurus has a complex taxonomic history, including multiple proposed species of which only a few are considered valid today. The genus was first described in 1877 by Othniel Charles Marsh from a very fragmentary specimen found in Colorado.

Why does Taxonomy of Allosaurus matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study Taxonomy of Allosaurus?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on Taxonomy of Allosaurus.

Tags

  • Carnosauria
  • Reptile taxonomy

Keep exploring