As originally stated in terms of direct-current resistive circuits only, Thévenin's theorem states that "Any linear electrical network containing only voltage sources, current sources and resistances can be replaced at terminals A–B by an equivalent combination of a voltage source Vth in a series connection with a resistance Rth."
The equivalent voltage Vth is the voltage obtained at terminals A–B of the network with terminals A–B open circuited. The equivalent resistance Rth is the resistance that the circuit between terminals A and B would have if all ideal voltage sources in the circuit were replaced by a short circuit and all ideal current sources were replaced by an open circuit (i.e., the sources are set to provide zero voltages and currents). If terminals A and B are connected to one another (short), then the current flowing from A and B will be V t h R t h {\textstyle {\frac {V_{\mathrm {th} }}{R_{\mathrm {th} }}}} according to the Thévenin equivalent circuit. This means that Rth could alternatively be calculated as Vth divided by the short-circuit current between A and B when they are connected together. In circuit theory terms, the theorem allows any one-port network to be reduced to a single voltage source and a single impedance. The theorem also applies to frequency domain AC circuits consisting of reactive (inductive and capacitive) and resistive impedances. It means the theorem applies for AC in an exactly same way to DC except that resistances are generalized to impedances. The theorem was independently derived in 1853 by the German scientist Hermann von Helmholtz and in 1883 by Léon Charles Thévenin (1857–1926), an electrical engineer with France's national Postes et Télégraphes telecommunications organization. Thévenin's theorem and its dual, Norton's theorem, are widely used to make circuit analysis simpler and to study a circuit's initial-condition and steady-state response. Thévenin's theorem can be used to convert any circuit's sources and impedances to a Thévenin equivalent; use of the theorem may in some cases be more convenient than use of Kirchhoff's circuit laws.
A proof of the theorem Various proofs have been given of Thévenin's theorem. Perhaps the simplest of these was the proof in Thévenin's original paper. A consensus exists that Thévenin's proof is both correct and general in its applicability. The proof goes as follows: Consider an active network containing impedances, (constant-) voltage sources and (constant-) current sources. The configuration of the network can be anything. Access to the network is provided by a pair of terminals. Designate the voltage measured between the terminals as Vθ, as shown in the box on the left side of Figure 2.
Suppose that the voltage sources within the box are replaced by short circuits, and the current sources by open circuits. If this is done, no voltage appears across the terminals, and it is possible to measure the impedance between the terminals. Call this impedance Zθ. Now suppose that one attaches some linear network to the terminals of the box, having impedance Ze, as in Figure 2a. We wish to find the current I through Ze. The answer is not obvious, since the terminal voltage will not be Vθ after Ze is connected. Instead, we imagine that we attach, in series with impedance Ze, a source with electromotive force E equal to Vθ but directed to oppose Vθ, as shown in Figure 2b. No current will then flow through Ze since E balances Vθ. Next, we insert another source of electromotive force, E1, in series with Ze, where E1 has the same magnitude as E but is opposed in direction (see Figure 2c). The current, I1, can be determined as follows: it is the current that would result from E1 acting alone, with all other sources (within the active network and the external network) set to zero. This current is, therefore,
I 1 = E 1 Z e + Z θ = V θ Z e + Z θ {\displaystyle I_{1}={\frac {E_{1}}{Z_{e}+Z_{\theta }}}={\frac {V_{\theta }}{Z_{e}+Z_{\theta }}}} because Ze is the impedance external to the box and Zθ looking into the box when its sources are zero. Finally, we note that E and E1 can be removed together without changing the current, and when they are removed, we are back to Figure 2a. Therefore, I1 is the current, I, that we are seeking, i.e.
I = V θ Z e + Z θ {\displaystyle I={\frac {V_{\theta }}{Z_{e}+Z_{\theta }}}}
thus, completing the proof. Figure 2d shows the Thévenin equivalent circuit.
… excerpt ends here. Continue reading the full article.





