ArticleslgStudy

astronomy

The Hunters or the Hunted?

The Hunters or the Hunted? is a astronomy topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand The Hunters or the Hunted? rather than just read about it. In short: The Hunters or the Hunted? An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy is a 1981 book by Charles Kimberlin Brain regarding the taphonomy of cave deposits in Africa.

The Hunters or the Hunted? — main illustration
The Hunters or the Hunted? — illustration

Key takeaways

  • The Hunters or the Hunted? belongs to astronomy; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect The Hunters or the Hunted? to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of The Hunters or the Hunted? from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

The Hunters or the Hunted? An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy is a 1981 book by Charles Kimberlin Brain regarding the taphonomy of cave deposits in Africa.

Structure and content The book is divided into two parts. The first part, "A Guide to the Interpretation of Bone Accumulations in African Caves," details the processes and effects on how taphonomy occurs. The second part, "Fossil Assemblages from the Sterkfontein Valley Caves: Analysis and Interpretation," deals successively with the Sterkfontein, Swartkrans, and Kromdraai caves. The final chapter, "Who were the hunters and who the hunted", concludes that australopithecines found in the three caves were brought in by carnivores, contrary to Raymond Dart's Osteodontokeratic culture hypothesis, which proposed that the bones were brought in by the australopithecines themselves.

Reception Neil Tappen, writing in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, wrote that the book "brings together the findings of a versatile investigator who has been working many years to interpret the hominid-bearing cave deposits in South Africa. It is a mine of information for professional students of the fossil record of human evolution, but the narrative is so clearly written that it should also capture the interest of undergraduates with a background in physical anthropology." He further states that the book is "a substantial reference work as well as an account of research; it should prove valuable to specialists as well as those with a general interest in the hominid fossil record." R. J. G. S., writing in Geological Magazine, described the book as "substantial, carefully documented and magnificently produced", although he questioned "the cost effectiveness of publishing long lists of material." He concluded, "All workers on African Pleistocene mammal faunas will certainly find a valuable store of information here. Those on other continents will doubtless use the data for comparison. But one is left with the final nagging feeling that taphonomy is not yet a science - at least not in the Popperian sense." Richard Klein, writing in Paleobiology, wrote that "Brain has shown that Dart was unjustified in concluding that the australopithecine bone assemblages reflect bone-tooth-horn ("osteodontokeratic") tool use by the australopithecines or even that it was the australopithecines who accumulated bones in the various Transvaal caves. However, Brain's countercase for carnivores as the primary bone accumulators may in turn be criticized on the grounds that it is plausible, but not compelling." Concluding that the book "has not only significantly advanced our understanding of an important paleoanthropological problem, but that he has also taken it as far as it can go with present knowledge, methods, and materials. His writing style is clear and unpretentious, and his text is well supported by illustrations and tables."

References

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with The Hunters or the Hunted?

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what The Hunters or the Hunted? claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In astronomy, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to The Hunters or the Hunted? before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about The Hunters or the Hunted? ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of The Hunters or the Hunted?

In research
The Hunters or the Hunted? appears in astronomy research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses The Hunters or the Hunted? in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
The Hunters or the Hunted? is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1981 non-fiction books, Paleontology books, University of Chicago Press books, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for The Hunters or the Hunted? outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “The Hunters or the Hunted?” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study The Hunters or the Hunted? in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what The Hunters or the Hunted? means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain The Hunters or the Hunted? out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is The Hunters or the Hunted? in simple terms?

The Hunters or the Hunted? An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy is a 1981 book by Charles Kimberlin Brain regarding the taphonomy of cave deposits in Africa.

Why does The Hunters or the Hunted? matter?

Because it connects several astronomy ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study The Hunters or the Hunted??

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on The Hunters or the Hunted?.

Tags

  • 1981 non-fiction books
  • Paleontology books
  • University of Chicago Press books

Keep exploring