ArticleslgStudy

science

The Rhetoric of Drugs

The Rhetoric of Drugs is a science topic covered in the lgStudy science library. This page brings together a partial reference excerpt, illustrations, worked examples, real-world applications and a short study plan, so you can understand The Rhetoric of Drugs rather than just read about it. In short: "The Rhetoric of Drugs" (French: Rhétorique de la drogue) is a 1990 work by French philosopher Jacques Derrida. Derrida, interviewed, discusses the concept of "drug", and says that "Already one must conclude that the concept of drug is a non-scientific concept, that it is instituted on the basis of moral or political evaluations." In his philosophical-linguistic analysis, Derrida unmasks the socio-cultural mystifica…

Key takeaways

  • The Rhetoric of Drugs belongs to science; place it in that map before memorising details.
  • Learn the definition first, then one example that makes the definition concrete.
  • Connect The Rhetoric of Drugs to a quantity you can measure, compute or draw — that is where exam questions come from.
  • Reproduce the core statement of The Rhetoric of Drugs from memory before moving on to harder problems.

Reference excerpt

"The Rhetoric of Drugs" (French: Rhétorique de la drogue) is a 1990 work by French philosopher Jacques Derrida. Derrida, interviewed, discusses the concept of "drug", and says that "Already one must conclude that the concept of drug is a non-scientific concept, that it is instituted on the basis of moral or political evaluations." In his philosophical-linguistic analysis, Derrida unmasks the socio-cultural mystifications made on the discourses on drugs. Derrida also discusses drugs use by athletes. Exploring its confines, he says: "and what about women athletes who get pregnant for the stimulating, hormonal effects and then have an abortion after their event?" Derrida discusses how the link between the rhetoric of drugs and the Western ideology. He also says that "Adorno and Horkheimer correctly point out that drug culture has always been associated with the West's other, with Oriental ethics and religion", and adds: "The Enlightenment [...] is in itself a declaration of war on drugs."

Editions This interview was made in 1989 and published more than one time as a journal article. It was included in the Derrida's 1992 book Points de suspension. Entretiens, as section XIV. The English edition of Points de suspension. Entretiens, titled Points...: Interviews 1974–1994 (1995), contained the interview at pp. 228–254, as the final part of the chapter Autobiophotographies.

"The Rhetoric of Drugs. an Interview" – journal article by Jacques Derrida; Differences, Vol. 5, 1993 "The Rhetoric of Drugs", translated by Michael Israel; published in Points: Interviews 1974-1994 (1995)

See also Prohibition (drugs) Recreational drug use Hard and soft drugs Arguments for and against drug prohibition Cognitive liberty

Notes

References English edition, 1995 Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer [1944]. Dialectic of Enlightenment (French translation by E. Kaufholz, Gallimard, 1974) Ma la droga non e' solo una parola, article published by Corriere della Sera, March 1993. Quotes from Montalcini: "the quibbles of a philosopher!" accuses Rita Levi Montalcini, which was the protagonist, with Di Pietro and Archbishop Martini, of last anti-drug publicity campaign. [...] Rita Levi Montalcini turns up her nose, bothered: "it seems to me that this gentleman ( 'questo signore', an Italian mildly derogative expression ) amuses himself quibbling, in order to appear original. Those that we call drugs ( "stupefacenti", an Italian word that sounds somewhat more 'official' ) are substances that are well identified both on the pharmacological-botanical level and on the behavioural level. You can mythologize them as much as you want, but it has been proven, that they are not at all, means to reach a higher knowledge. On the contrary, they decrease cognitive ability and increase emotional responses. Neither Newton nor Einstein made their discoveries under the action of any drug".

Worked examples

Example 1 — a first encounter with The Rhetoric of Drugs

Start with the simplest possible case. Write down what The Rhetoric of Drugs claims or describes in one sentence, then invent the smallest concrete situation in which that sentence is true. In science, the smallest case is usually a single object, a single equation or a single measurement. Check that every symbol or term in your sentence has a meaning in that case.

Example 2 — changing one variable

Take the situation from Example 1 and change exactly one quantity: double it, halve it, or set it to zero. Predict what should happen to The Rhetoric of Drugs before you calculate. Comparing your prediction with the result is the fastest way to find out whether you understand the idea or only the words.

Example 3 — an exam-style question

Typical questions about The Rhetoric of Drugs ask you to (a) state it precisely, (b) apply it to given data, and (c) explain a limitation. Practise writing all three answers in under five minutes; the third part is what separates a full-mark answer from an average one.

Applications of The Rhetoric of Drugs

In research
The Rhetoric of Drugs appears in science research whenever the underlying quantities have to be modelled precisely. Papers usually cite it as a starting assumption and then explore where it breaks down.
In technology and industry
Engineering practice reuses The Rhetoric of Drugs in design rules, simulations and safety margins. Knowing the idea lets you read a specification sheet and understand why the numbers look the way they do.
In the classroom
The Rhetoric of Drugs is common in secondary-school and first-year university syllabi. It links to neighbouring topics 1989 non-fiction books, Books of interviews, Non-fiction books about drugs, so understanding it makes those chapters shorter.
In everyday life
Look for The Rhetoric of Drugs outside the textbook — in sport, cooking, traffic, electronics or the sky above you. An example you found yourself is remembered far longer than one you were given.
Ask Teacher Smith questions about this articleOpens your AI tutor with a question about “The Rhetoric of Drugs” →

Affiliate

Preply — study more efficiently by working with a personal tutor. 50% off.

How to study The Rhetoric of Drugs in 20 minutes

  1. Read the reference excerpt below once, without taking notes.
  2. Close the page and write down what The Rhetoric of Drugs means in your own words.
  3. Compare your version with the excerpt and mark what you missed.
  4. Work through the three examples above with pen and paper.
  5. Explain The Rhetoric of Drugs out loud to somebody else — or to Teacher Smith in the lgStudy chat.

Frequently asked questions

What is The Rhetoric of Drugs in simple terms?

"The Rhetoric of Drugs" (French: Rhétorique de la drogue) is a 1990 work by French philosopher Jacques Derrida. Derrida, interviewed, discusses the concept of "drug", and says that "Already one must conclude that the concept of drug is a non-scientific concept, that it is instituted on the basis of…

Why does The Rhetoric of Drugs matter?

Because it connects several science ideas at once: it gives you a definition you can apply, a quantity you can calculate, and a way to check whether a result is plausible.

How should I study The Rhetoric of Drugs?

Read the excerpt, restate it from memory, then work through the examples and applications listed on this page. The five-step study plan above takes about twenty minutes.

What does this page cover?

It gives you a compact reference excerpt plus original lgStudy explanations, examples, applications and study material on The Rhetoric of Drugs.

Tags

  • 1989 non-fiction books
  • Books of interviews
  • Non-fiction books about drugs
  • Pharmaceuticals policy
  • Philosophy essays
  • Political science books
  • Social philosophy literature
  • Works by Jacques Derrida
  • Works originally published in French magazines

Keep exploring